View clinical trials related to Vaccine Response.
Filter by:This study is being done to answer the question: Does the use of statin lipid-lowering medication change the effect of influenza vaccine? The research team will use the knowledge gained from answering this question to understand how this medication affects long-lasting immune responses to vaccines. The researchers will study the immune response to the influenza vaccine in the blood (where antibodies are). The team will also look at how statin therapy affects the bacteria that live in the gut by collecting stool samples. To be in this research, participants must be adults willing to receive vaccines.
Objective: To investigate whether replacement of MMF/MPA by everolimus in kidney transplant recipients results in superior immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination as measured by neutralizing antibody titer against the Omicron XBB.1.5 strain. Trial design: Multicentre, open-label randomized controlled clinical trial, for a duration of at least 10 weeks with an optional extension to 18 weeks. Trial population: Kidney transplant recipients, 18 years or older, who are at least 6 months after transplantation, with a functioning kidney transplant, using MMF/MPA in combination with at least one other immunosuppressant including a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), with at least 3 previous COVID-19 vaccinations (=basic COVID-19 immunisation). Interventions: Patients will be randomized into one of two equally sized groups, with either continuation of their current immunosuppressive regimen including MMF/MPA or replacement of MMF/MPA by everolimus during at least six weeks before until four weeks after the last vaccination. Patients will receive a repeated COVID-19 vaccination with the monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 vaccine, 28 days thereafter they can opt to also receive two herpes zoster vaccinations with the Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) with an interval between the first and second dose of 28 days. Main trial endpoints: The neutralizing antibody titer against the Omicron XBB.1.5. strain 28 days after monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccination in patients continuing MMF/MPA compared to patients who switched to everolimus. Secondary trial endpoints: - SARS-CoV-2 specific anti-S1 antibody level at 28 and 56 days after COVID-19 vaccination - Varicella zoster specific anti-gE antibody level 28 days after 1st and 2nd herpes zoster vaccination - SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination - Varicella zoster specific T-cell response 28 days after 2nd herpes zoster vaccination - Safety in terms of incidence of acute rejection, kidney function decline, SAEs, AESIs and solicited local and systemic AEs after COVID-19 and herpes zoster vaccination
The ability of the vaccines today to generate a long-lasting protection against infections varies greatly from one vaccine to another. The yellow fever vaccine (YF-17D) is one of the most successful vaccines ever developed, having been administered to over 600 million people globally. A single vaccination is known to induce durable protection over several decades. In contrast, the quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) generates an immunity that wanes quickly with no long-lasting protection. Currently, the duration of immune protection for new vaccines is difficult to predict during vaccine product development and can only be ascertained by a "wait and see" approach. This is due, in part, to the fact that some of the signals that activate a durable immune system protection remain unknown. This study aims to provide a better understanding of this problem by vaccinating willing participants with either the FDA-approved yellow fever vaccine or the quadrivalent influenza vaccine and collecting baseline and follow-up biologic samples to compare how the immune system reacts.
Assess efficacy of oral ingestion of a probiotic product on immune function in a population of healthy adult men and women in a clinical vaccination study.
This is a prospective, single-arm study designed to understand the mechanisms that lead to a loss of response to influenza vaccine in older adults. The investigators will recruit and longitudinally follow a cohort of 66 older adults (65 years and older) who will receive three different influenza vaccines over three annual influenza seasons. Blood samples will be collected from the participants at each of the sixteen study visits over three years. Nasal swab and stool samples will also be collected from participants at seven time-points across the study period. The study is not designed to assess safety or tolerability of the influenza vaccines administered as part of this study.
A randomized, multi-centre trial was conducted between 2013-2016, including 128 patients with untreated CLL from eight hematological clinics in Sweden. Vaccination with polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPSV23) or conjugated pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13) was performed and the results were published 2018. PCV13 showed a superior immune response, measured as OPA (opsonophagocytic assays) and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), compared to PPSV23. Immune cells analyses after primary immunization will be performed. Between 2019-2021 a prospective follow up study was conducted of the same cohort and also included a control group. The study participants have been revaccinated with pneumococcal vaccines with the aim to evaluate the effect of repeated dose of PCV13. The antibody response (measured as titer with FMIA (fluorescent multiplexed bead-based immunoassay) and antibody function with MOPA (multiplexed opsonophagocytic assay) will be performed. Studies investigating the dynamics of immune cells before and after primary immunization and revaccination will be performed. The study will give important answers about the optimal vaccination strategy in patients with CLL and can improve the vaccination recommendations in immunocompromised patients.
The STOPCoV study is a decentralized study comparing COVID-19 vaccine specific antibody levels at 24 weeks after final vaccine dose. We plan to study the safety and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine(s) in community dwelling persons 70 years and over relative to a younger group (aged 30 - 50 years).
This study will evaluate the impact of sleep, circadian health and melatonin on flu vaccine immunogenicity.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic presents a great challenge to global health. The first case was identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China and since has infected nearly 100 million people and claimed almost 2 million lives worldwide. In response, the medical community and scientists have worked hard to develop effective therapies and guidelines to treat a wide range of symptoms including the use of the antiviral drug remdesivir, convalescent plasma, antibiotics, steroids, and anticoagulant therapy. To prevent the spread of the disease, multiple vaccines based on mRNA and DNA technologies that include inactivated viral components have been developed and millions of doses are currently being administered worldwide. Early analysis of data from the phase III Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccine trials suggested the vaccine was more than 90% effective in preventing the illness with a good safety profile (Polack et al., 2020). However, there are still many unknowns regarding the long-term safety of these newer vaccine technologies and the level and duration of immunogenicity. SARS-CoV-2 infection results in seroconversion and production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The antibodies may suppress viral replication through neutralization but might also participate in COVID-19 pathogenesis through a process termed antibody-dependent enhancement (Lu et al., 2020). Rapid progress has been made in the research of antibody response and therapy in COVID-19 patients, including characterization of the clinical features of antibody responses in different populations infected by SARS-CoV-2, treatment of COVID-19 patients with convalescent plasma and intravenous immunoglobin products, isolation and characterization of a large panel of monoclonal neutralizing antibodies and early clinical testing, as well as clinical results from several COVID-19 vaccine candidates. In this study, we plan to assess the effic of both vaccines on the healthcare workers. As healthcare workers begin to receive their first vaccination dosage, we will start looking for traces of antibodies within the blood and saliva. The data provided will help us determine the efficacy of the vaccine over a period of 1 year, identify any difference in efficacy amongst different populations (gender, age, and ethnicities) differences among vaccine types, demographics and follow-up on any potential side effects. We will collaborate with Nirmidas Biotech Inc. based in Palto Alto, California, a Stanford University spinoff on this project. Nirmidas Biotech. Inc is a young diagnostic company that have received several FDA EUA tests for COVID-19. We will perform IgG/IgM antibody detection by the NIRMIDAS MidaSpot™ COVID-19 Antibody Combo Detection Kit approved by FDA EUA for POC testing in our hospital site for qualitative antibody testing. We will then send dry blood spot and saliva to Nirmidas for the pGOLD™ COVID-19 High Accuracy IgG/IgM Assay to quantify antibody levels and avidity, both of which are important to immunity. The pGOLD assay is a novel nanotechnology assay platform capable of quantifying antibody levels and binding affinity to viruses. We collaborated recently with Nirmidas on this platform and published a joint paper in Nature Biomedical Engineering on COVID-19 Ab pGOLD assay (Liu et al., 2020). It is also capable of detecting antibodies in saliva samples and could offer a non-invasive approach to assessing antibody response for vaccination.
Based on recent data, COVID (COV) vaccination in cancer patients (pts) is strictly recommended. For oncologic pts,2 types of m-RNA vaccines have been approved: BNT162b2 (Pfizer, Biontech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna, NIAID). In immunocompetent population, the administration of 2 doses confers 95% protection against COV. However, protection conferred by vaccines, adverse events (AEs) and correlations with antiblastic treatments are unknown in cancer pts.