View clinical trials related to Vaccine Response.
Filter by:Objective: To investigate whether replacement of MMF/MPA by everolimus in kidney transplant recipients results in superior immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination as measured by neutralizing antibody titer against the Omicron XBB.1.5 strain. Trial design: Multicentre, open-label randomized controlled clinical trial, for a duration of at least 10 weeks with an optional extension to 18 weeks. Trial population: Kidney transplant recipients, 18 years or older, who are at least 6 months after transplantation, with a functioning kidney transplant, using MMF/MPA in combination with at least one other immunosuppressant including a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), with at least 3 previous COVID-19 vaccinations (=basic COVID-19 immunisation). Interventions: Patients will be randomized into one of two equally sized groups, with either continuation of their current immunosuppressive regimen including MMF/MPA or replacement of MMF/MPA by everolimus during at least six weeks before until four weeks after the last vaccination. Patients will receive a repeated COVID-19 vaccination with the monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 vaccine, 28 days thereafter they can opt to also receive two herpes zoster vaccinations with the Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) with an interval between the first and second dose of 28 days. Main trial endpoints: The neutralizing antibody titer against the Omicron XBB.1.5. strain 28 days after monovalent Omicron XBB.1.5 COVID-19 vaccination in patients continuing MMF/MPA compared to patients who switched to everolimus. Secondary trial endpoints: - SARS-CoV-2 specific anti-S1 antibody level at 28 and 56 days after COVID-19 vaccination - Varicella zoster specific anti-gE antibody level 28 days after 1st and 2nd herpes zoster vaccination - SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell response 28 days after COVID-19 vaccination - Varicella zoster specific T-cell response 28 days after 2nd herpes zoster vaccination - Safety in terms of incidence of acute rejection, kidney function decline, SAEs, AESIs and solicited local and systemic AEs after COVID-19 and herpes zoster vaccination
Assess efficacy of oral ingestion of a probiotic product on immune function in a population of healthy adult men and women in a clinical vaccination study.
A randomized, multi-centre trial was conducted between 2013-2016, including 128 patients with untreated CLL from eight hematological clinics in Sweden. Vaccination with polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPSV23) or conjugated pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13) was performed and the results were published 2018. PCV13 showed a superior immune response, measured as OPA (opsonophagocytic assays) and ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), compared to PPSV23. Immune cells analyses after primary immunization will be performed. Between 2019-2021 a prospective follow up study was conducted of the same cohort and also included a control group. The study participants have been revaccinated with pneumococcal vaccines with the aim to evaluate the effect of repeated dose of PCV13. The antibody response (measured as titer with FMIA (fluorescent multiplexed bead-based immunoassay) and antibody function with MOPA (multiplexed opsonophagocytic assay) will be performed. Studies investigating the dynamics of immune cells before and after primary immunization and revaccination will be performed. The study will give important answers about the optimal vaccination strategy in patients with CLL and can improve the vaccination recommendations in immunocompromised patients.
Iron deficiency and anemia are health issues affecting mainly infants and women in developing countries. Iron deficiency in infancy can have long-lasting impact on cognitive and motor development of the child. Iron fortification has shown to be effective against anemia. However, in areas with a high burden of infectious diseases iron may increase the risk of unfavorable gut microbiota composition possibly influencing diarrhea prevalence. Therefore we want to assess the effects of home fortification of complementary food with two iron-containing micronutrient powders (MNPs) with and without the addition of a prebiotic (7.5 g of galactooligosaccharides as GOS-75) compared to a control on the composition of the gut microbiota of Kenyan infants. In addition, iron deficiency may iimpair adaptive immunity. Following Kenyan Minstry of Health guidelines, infants receive their first measles vaccine at 9 months. In this study we will use an MNP with a moderate iron dose of 5 mg, with 2.5 mg of Fe as NaFeEDTA and 2.5 mg of Fe as ferrous fumarate (+Fe). There will be 3 study groups MNP, MNP+Fe and MNP+Fe+GOS. The infants will be enrolled in the study at the age of 6-10 months and will consume a home-fortified maize porridge for four months. At baseline and endpoint (after 4 months of intervention), we will collect blood samples of the infants in order to assess anemia, iron status, and inflammation. In addition, we will assess the effect of iron supplementation on measles vaccine response. Fecal samples (from child and mother) will be collected at baseline, 3 weeks and at endpoint in order to evaluate the changes in gut microbiota and gut inflammation. During the intervention, in a sub-group of children who receive broad-spectrum antibiotics, we will compare how the three different interventions modify the effect of antibiotics on the infant gut microbiota. We will opportunistically select children that are enrolled in the study and who become ill, and who are prescribed antibiotics by the local health care team, according to the local standard of care in the study area. Five additional stool samples from these children will be collected (day 0 (before the first antibiotic dose), 5, 10, 20 and 40) to evaluate the changes in the gut microbiota and gut inflammation. Three years after the study end, we would like to collect a blood and stool sample from the children and examine the iron status and gut microbiome respectively.
Background: - Vaccines create resistance to disease. This study tests experimental human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccines that use an adenovirus as a transporter. Transporters may help vaccines stimulate an immune response against HIV. This means the body works to fight infection. Researchers want to see if different ways of giving the vaccines cause different immune responses. They also want to see if the vaccines adenovirus is contagious. Adenoviruses cause cold symptoms or mild eye infections. Participants cannot get HIV from these vaccines. But they can get the adenovirus, so their entire household and intimate contacts must participate. Objective: - To test the safety of experimental HIV vaccines. Eligibility: - Healthy adults 18-49 years old. Design: - Participants will be screened with medical history, physical exam, and blood and urine tests. - Participants will receive the vaccine 3 times over 6 months. Each time, they will have a physical exam and blood and urine tests. Samples will be taken from their nose, rectum, and cervix. - Some participants will receive the vaccine by swallowing 11 capsules with water. Clinic staff will observe them for 1 hour. - Some participants will receive the vaccine swabbed in their throat. They will get dose 1 at the hospital and stay there for 1 week. They will have medical tests and nose swabs. Doses 2 and 3 will not require a hospital stay. - Participants will have 7 follow-up visits over 6 months, with a physical exam and blood tests. Samples will be taken from their nose, throat, and rectum. - Household and intimate contacts will have 4 clinic visits over 8 months, with a physical exam and blood tests.