View clinical trials related to Tuberculosis.
Filter by:Although effective therapy for tuberculosis is available, TB continues to cause significant problems worldwide, and rates of multi-drug resistant (MDR) TB cases are on the rise. A major obstacle to the control of TB is poor adherence with lengthy (usually 6 months) and complicated treatment regimens. Incomplete TB treatment can lead to serious consequences such as increased severity of illness and death, prolonged infectiousness and transmission in the community, and the development of drug resistance. The development of new treatment strategies with more stronger drugs could lead to shorter and simpler regimens. A TB treatment regimen that allowed treatment duration to be meaningfully decreased would have important public health implications. This trial will compare the effect and safety of a new oral regimen to that of the standard regimen for the first phase of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis. The experimental regimen will consist of the following: - Two months of isoniazid, rifapentine, pyrazinamide and moxifloxacin (HPZM) administered once daily. Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) will be given with each dose of isoniazid. The standard control intensive phase regimen will consist of the following: - Two months of isoniazid, rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol (HRZE) administered once daily. Pyridoxine (vitamin B6) will be given with each dose of isoniazid. Following intensive phase therapy (the study phase), all patients will be treated with a non-experimental continuation phase regimen. In mice, the combination of Moxifloxacin and Rifapentine have cured the animals significantly faster than the standard regimen and this study will be the first step to see if the potential is also there in humans.
This study, conducted in Masan and Seoul, South Korea, investigated the effectiveness of linezolid (LZD) in treating patients with extensively drug resistant tuberculosis (XDR TB). Because regular medicines do not work well against XDR TB, many more people die from it than from regular TB, which can be successfully treated by taking TB medication for 6 months. Linezolid has been used to treat other kinds of infections, but has not been well studied for TB. This study examined the side effects and effectiveness of prolonged treatment with linezolid at two different doses. People 20 years of age and older who have XDR TB were eligible for this 3-year study. Participants underwent the following tests and procedures: - LZD treatment: Patients were randomly assigned to one of two study groups. Group 1 patients were observed for 2 months before starting LZD, while group 2 patients begin taking LZD right away. Both groups began with a 600 mg daily dose of LZD. After patients stopped coughing up TB germs (or after 4 months on LZD) they were randomly assigned either to continue taking 600 mg of LZD for the rest of the study or to take a decreased dose of 300 mg. In addition to LZD, patients continued to take their currently prescribed TB medications. - Medical history. - Physical examinations each month during treatment. - Sputum collections once a week or more until 3 weeks after the patient was no longer contagious. - Blood draws every week for 16 to 24 weeks and then once a month. - Urine collections at several time points. - Nerve and eye examinations before starting treatment and then monthly to look for possible LZD side effects. - CT scans of the lungs three to four times the first year and once more later in the study. For this test the patient lay on a table within the doughnut-shaped CT scanner while special X-ray pictures are taken. Patients who participated in a substudy had PET scans instead of the CT scans. For this test, the patient was given an injection into a vein of a radioactive chemical that can be detected by a special camera and viewed on a screen. The patient lay on a table within the doughnut-shaped scanner while pictures were taken.
This study will assess the safety and immunogenicity of a GSK Biologicals' candidate TB vaccine (692342) administered at 0, 1 month to HIV-positive adults living in Switzerland.
Until recently, the tuberculin skin test (TST) was the only available diagnostic assay for detection of latent infection with M. tuberculosis (LTBI). Despite the low overall incidence of symptomatic tuberculosis infection in low-prevalence countries, the potential mortality and morbidity mandate constant vigilance to identify patients at risk for reactivation. Due to systemic immunosuppression, immunocompromised patients with latent M. tuberculosis infection are at increased risk of progression to active disease. This applies to patients with various causes of immunodeficiency such as HIV-infected patients, allogeneic stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients, patients with rheumatoid arthritis and patients with chronic renal failure. Therefore, current guidelines aimed at preventing tuberculosis infection in immunocompromized individuals recommend a generalized screening for evidence of latent infection to target appropriate preventative prophylaxis. At present, tuberculosis control programs exclusively rely on the tuberculin skin test to identify a latent infection in asymptomatic individuals. Recently, novel in vitro assays termed T cell interferon-gamma release assay (TIGRA) have become available that are based on the detection of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) production in T cells or supernatants after stimulation with highly specific antigens of M. tuberculosis. Two TIGRA are commercially available, the ELISPOT based T.SPOT.TB and the ELISA based QuantiFERON-TB Gold test (now available as an "IN-TUBE" version). The aim of the study is a prospective comparison of the two commercially available approved TIGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB) with the established Mendel-Mantoux skin-test in immunocompromized patients (main focus on sensitivity and specificity). The study hypotheses are as follows: 1. In immunocompromised patients, the two commercially available approved TIGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB) have increased sensitivity and specificity as compared to the established Mendel-Mantoux skin-test. 2. Results from QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T.SPOT.TB do not differ in immunocompromised patients.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of oral Zinc administration in new smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Evidence is available suggesting that zinc deficiency rapidly diminishes antibody- and cell-mediated immune responses in both humans and animals and renders the individual susceptible to a variety of pathogens. This micronutrient has also been found to be useful in the treatment of lung tuberculosis in limited number of patients. We are conducting this study in category-I patients (As per World Health Organization, Geneva classification of tuberculosis) having lung tuberculosis to see the efficacy and also to see any change in the immunological parameters.
Tuberculosis (TB) is the most common opportunistic infection among HIV infected persons living in developing countries. Directly observed treatment, short-course (DOTS) is the internationally recommended strategy for the treatment of TB. However, the efficacy of DOTS for the treatment of HIV-associated TB is not well studied. This study aims to compare the efficacy of thrice weekly DOTS in HIV-infected versus HIV-negative patients with TB.
This study aims to compare the performance of the tuberculin skin test, used for more than 50 years as a diagnostic tool for latent tuberculosis infection, with 2 blood tests which have recently become commercially available (Interferon-gamma release assays) in a population of immunosuppressed individuals with chronic renal failure undergoing long term hemodialysis
Protocol Synopsis The goal of this Phase 2 clinical trial is to evaluate the antimicrobial activity and safety of an experimental intensive phase (first 8 weeks of treatment) tuberculosis treatment regimen in which rifapentine is substituted for rifampin. Primary Objective - To compare the antimicrobial activity and safety of standard daily regimen comprised of rifampin (approximately 10 mg/kg/dose) + isoniazid + pyrazinamide + ethambutol (RHZE) to that of an experimental regimen comprised of rifapentine (approximately 10 mg/kg/dose) + isoniazid + pyrazinamide + ethambutol (PHZE). Secondary Objectives - To determine and compare for each regimen the time to culture-conversion, using data from 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-week cultures (10, 20, 30, 40 doses). - To determine and compare for each regimen the proportion of patients with any Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions - To determine the correlation of the MGIT/BACTEC liquid culture growth index and other mycobacterial and clinical biomarkers with time to culture conversion and treatment failure - To store serum for future assessment of biomarkers of TB treatment response and hypersensitivity to study drugs. - To compare adverse events and 2-month culture conversion rates among HIV-infected patients vs. HIV-uninfected patients - To determine the tolerability and safety, and estimate the antimicrobial activity, of experimental regimens that include isoniazid + pyrazinamide + ethambutol plus either rifapentine 15 mg/kg/dose or rifapentine 20 mg/kg/dose, all administered daily. Assessment of these doses of rifapentine will be performed as an extension to the main study after enrollment in the main study has been completed. Design This will be a prospective, multicenter, open-label clinical study. Adults suspected of having pulmonary tuberculosis who meet eligibility criteria will be randomized to receive either the experimental intensive phase tuberculosis treatment regimen or the standard intensive phase tuberculosis treatment regimen. Randomization will be stratified by presence/absence of cavitation on baseline chest radiograph, and by geographic continent. All doses of study drugs will be given under direct observation and administered 5 days per week. After a subject completes intensive phase therapy, he/she then will be treated with a non-experimental continuation phase tuberculosis treatment regimen. The study extension will be a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Eligibility criteria will be the same as for the main study. Participants will be randomized to one of four regimens: the standard intensive phase treatment regimen, an investigational regimen in which rifapentine 10 mg/kg/dose is substituted for rifampin, an investigational regimen in which rifapentine 15 mg/kg/dose is substituted for rifampin, or an investigational regimen in which rifapentine 20 mg/kg is substituted for rifampin. Randomization will be stratified by the presence/absence of cavitation on baseline chest radiograph, and by study site. Study drugs will be administered 7 days per week. After a subject completes intensive phase therapy, he/she then will be treated with a non-experimental continuation phase tuberculosis treatment regimen. Subjects will have blood drawn for one pharmacokinetic determination of rifapentine concentration at or after the week 2 visit during intensive phase therapy. This study is being conducted in 2 phases. 1. The main study compares a 10 mg/kg dose of rifapentine, open label, against 10 mg/kg rifampin in an otherwise standard intensive phase regimen of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis. The projected sample size was 480 enrollments; 530 patients were actually enrolled. 2. The study extension evaluates higher doses of rifapentine, with the specific rifapentine doses (10 mg/kg, 15 mg/kg, and 20 mg/kg) blinded to patients and clinicians, with data collection and endpoints otherwise similar to the main study. The projected sample size for the study extension is 320 enrollments.
HIV induced altered representation and function of regulatory T cell subsets (NKT and Treg cells) impair the protective T cell response against M.tuberculosis and disrupts LTBI, thus facilitates faster progression and development of severe forms of clinical TB in HIV-TB co-infection.
This is a one-period, double-blind, single-center pharmacokinetic study of linezolid in patients with MDR or XDR tuberculosis treated with linezolid and an Optimized Background Therapy (defined as treatment with > 4 drugs with activity against tuberculosis to which the patient's isolate is believed to be sensitive by history or based on drug sensitivity testing).