View clinical trials related to HIV Infections.
Filter by:This project builds on our experience with the ASAP Study (McGill University Health Centre research ethics board: MP-37-2020-4911). The goal of this study is to better understand the experience of migrant people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) of having their treatment switched to Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF). In other words, the investigators want to evaluate how feasible and acceptable this switch is, and how participants will take B/F/TAF (fidelity) and remain on it. The investigators also want to know more about migrant people with HIV's experience of care; namely, how often they see their HIV specialist or other healthcare professionals, and their healthcare coverage (the type of insurance that they have).
The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, of the ACCELERATE model of care to achieve HIV viral suppression at Week 24. The study will also assess the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, and sustainability of the ACCELERATE model of care. The ACCELERATE model combines a standardized method for outreach, the use of telehealth for rapid access to an HIV care provider, a simplified pre-approved HIV regimen, a free 30-day medication starter supply, and re-linkage to medical care.
Novel strategies are needed to engage men in Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) with HIV testing, treatment and prevention services to drive the epidemic towards elimination. Suboptimal engagement with HIV prevention by men increases their risk of HIV acquisition, and is an important driver of new HIV infections in women. HIV self-testing (HIVST) addresses several key facility-based access barriers and HIVST distribution through leveraging male peer networks for HIV prevention is feasible, acceptable and effective in SSA. The objective of this project is to use an implementation science approach to establish the impact of HIVST distribution through male social networks, with phone-based support and improved risk perception, on PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis) uptake among men in Eastern Zimbabwe. The project will leverage infrastructure and data associated with 20-year programme of HIV surveillance and behavioural research in a well-characterized population cohort hosted by the Manicaland Centre for Public Health Research, Zimbabwe. The study will utilise a cluster randomised design of 44 clusters (22 Intervention:22 control) comprising on average 81 men in each cluster (total N = 3591) followed for 6 months (giving >80% power to detect a difference in PrEP initiation among men of 2% versus 8.5%). In intervention clusters the investigators will identify initial distributors who will receive an HIVST kit for personal use and HIVST kits to distribute to local peers. These peers can subsequently become distributors, allowing the intervention to propagate through peer networks. A toll-free helpline will provide pre- and post-test support and an SMS (Short Message Service) -based risk assessment will expedite PrEP initiation at the clinic. The study team will conduct a performance (process) evaluation of the intervention. to assess implementation fidelity, causal mechanisms underlying trial effectiveness including how characteristics of peer networks affect outcomes. Results of the study will be used to quantify the population level impacts and cost-effectiveness of male peer to peer HIVST distribution strategies on the uptake of PrEP in HIV hyper-endemic settings using a fully calibrated individual-based mathematical model. The envisaged long-term impact of this research is the development of a generalizable, multicomponent male peer-based HIVST and PrEP uptake model for settings where HIV incidence is high.
Despite the widespread availability of effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) in the United States, there remains significant numbers of people living with HIV (PLWH) who fail to achieve and or maintain viral suppression (VS). Disparities persist with the lowest levels of VS among Black individuals, people who use drugs, youth ages 18-24 and people residing in rural areas. Investigators will examine the syndemics underlying these outcomes including substance use, mental health, and barriers to HIV care including racial discrimination, stigma and rural isolation.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate effect of food (in fasted and fed conditions) on the bioavailability of CAI VH4011499.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance, usability, and result interpretation of the INSTI® HIV Self-Test (referred to INSTI® HIV ST) in the intended use population across the United States (US). The INSTI® HIV Self-Test is a single use in vitro test that is used as a self-test for the detection of antibodies to HIV-1 and HIV-2 in human fingerstick blood. This study is designed to evaluate INSTI® HIV ST performance in the hands of non-professionals and untrained lay users who are inexperienced in HIV blood-based self-testing. The study aims to: To evaluate the clinical performance (i.e., diagnostic sensitivity and specificity) of the INSTI® HIV Self-Test in a lay user population. To assess the user's comprehension of the INSTI® HIV ST results (e.g., interpreting positive, negative, and invalid results). To evaluate the usability of the INSTI® HIV ST and understand users' experience in performing the test.
The overall goal of the P4P: Peers for PrEP (pre-exposure prophylaxis) study is to pilot test a peer-led and delivered intervention for biomedical HIV prevention that is tailored to women who engage in sex work in southwestern Uganda. This study will evaluate whether this intervention is feasible, acceptable, and increases uptake of biomedical prevention.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two multifaceted strategies (standard vs enhanced) for scaling Bridges in a two-arm Hybrid III effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) in adolescent and youths affected by AIDS [AYaAIDS] (ages 13-17 years) from 48 schools in the Greater Masaka region of Uganda. The main aims of the clinical trial are: Aim 1. Compare the implementation effectiveness of the standard implementation strategy vs. an enhanced implementation strategy. The investigators will assess fidelity to Bridges (primary implementation outcome) and sustainment of Bridges (exploratory implementation outcome). Aim 2. Determine the clinical effectiveness of Bridges implemented via a standard vs. enhanced implementation strategy. Aim 3: Explore implementation processes, mechanisms, and determinants. Aim 4. Compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of the two implementation strategies. Using an activity-based ingredients approach, the investigators will examine how much each strategy costs to achieve a unit of effect.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to test the effectiveness of a resilience intervention and an adherence intervention in improving health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among perinatally infected HIV positive children and their HIV positive mothers in China. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Whether baseline resilience and treatment adherence are associated with the HRQoL; 2. Whether the resilience intervention will improve the mediators associated with intervention sessions, such as positive coping and social support, the proximal outcome of resilience factors, the distal outcome of HRQoL, and dyadic level outcomes such as dyadic coping; 3. Whether the adherence intervention will improve the mediators associated with intervention sessions, such as adherence information and behavioral skills, the proximal outcome of self-reported adherence, the distal outcome of HRQoL, and dyadic level outcomes such as dyadic coping; 4. Whether the enhanced mediators (e.g., positive coping and social support) associated with the resilience-intervention sessions at the end of the intervention will transmit the effect of the resilience intervention on the increases in resilience factors during follow-ups; 5. Whether the improved mediators (e.g., adherence information and behavioral skills) associated with the adherence-intervention sessions at the completion of the intervention will transmit the effect of the adherence intervention on the increases in adherence in follow-ups. Participating mother-child dyads in the two intervention arms will receive two sessions of dyadic intervention. Researchers will compare the above-described outcomes between participants in the two intervention arms and the control arm (treatment as usual) to see the effectiveness of the interventions.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate at 96 weeks the safety with respect to hepatitis B control of 2 treatment reduction strategies for patients with previously controlled HIV-HBV co-infection on continuous triple therapy