View clinical trials related to Tobacco Use.
Filter by:To pilot test the appeal of non-tobacco oral nicotine products in cigarette smokers, smokeless tobacco users, and oral nicotine users.
A single-center study designed to evaluate changes in short-term biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) in healthy adult cigarette smokers of two age groups (Group A: 24-34 years; Group B: 35-60 years) during 14 days of smoking abstinence.
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of patient navigation to promote linkage to smoking cessation treatments in cancer patients.
This is an open-label, 4-way crossover study designed to estimate the nicotine, glycerin, propylene glycol, menthol, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein levels in exhaled breath samples during use of four MarkTen® XL e-vapor products. The study will enroll approximately 32 adult e-vapor-using subjects at one site in the United States in High Point, NC.
This study is designed to evaluate plasma nicotine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters following the use of nicotine pouches in cigarette smokers who have experience with use of smokeless tobacco (SST) [e.g., snus, moist snuff].
The purpose of this study was to estimate changes in biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) in adult cigarette smokers (AS) who switched to using an e-vapor product (EVP) relative to adult smokers who continue smoking exclusively.
Tobacco use is associated with high mortality, and a range of morbidities including cancer, and lung and cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, tobacco users who die prematurely deprive their families of income, raise the cost of health care and hinder economic development. India is the second-largest consumer (current use-48% males, 20% females; 275 million adults) and third largest producer of tobacco in the world5; and has one of the highest mortality related to tobacco. The treatment gap for tobacco use in India is as high as 92%. Opportunistic screening and brief interventions in primary care, although recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), is largely missing in current practice in India. The existing tobacco cessation strategy in India has shown limited success due to poor availability and accessibility of tobacco cessation services, and non-availability of interventions that are culturally relevant and contextual to the target population. Preliminary formative research as a part of the larger ToQuit study has informed the development of the first version of the treatment package. This first version of the package was tested through a case series, by refining the intervention content and delivery mechanisms through an iterative process, to develop the final intervention. This pilot Randomised Control Trial (RCT) will aim to empirically evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the mobile-based brief intervention (BI) for tobacco use, generate preliminary estimates of the impact of the BI, and fine-tune the procedures for a definitive RCT.
This is a randomised, open-label, confined, cross-over study to evaluate the nicotine pharmacokinetics (PK) of modern oral nicotine pouches and nicotine lozenges carried out in 36 healthy adult subjects who smoke cigarettes and who may have experience using smokeless tobacco (loose or pouches).
This is an open-label, randomized, 5-way crossover study designed to evaluate plasma nicotine pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters following an ad libitum use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System (ENDS) investigational products (IPs) in a confinement setting by generally healthy combustible cigarette (CC) smokers.
The main purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effectiveness of "nudges" to clinicians, to patients, or to both in increasing Tobacco Use Treatment Service (TUTS) referral and engagement; and to explore clinician, patient, inner setting (e.g., clinic), and outer setting (e.g., payment structures) mechanisms related to TUTS referral and engagement. The investigators will employ rapid-cycle approaches to optimize the framing of nudges to clinicians and patients prior to initiating the trial and mixed methods to explore contextual factors and mechanisms. The investigators will conduct a four-arm pragmatic cluster randomize clinical trial to test the effectiveness of nudges to clinicians, nudges to patients, or nudges to both in increasing TUTS referral and engagement in cancer patients who smoke, vs. usual care (UC). The investigators hypothesize that each of the implementation strategy arms will significantly increase TUTS referral and engagement compared to UC and that the combination of nudges to clinicians and to patients will be the most effective.