View clinical trials related to Survivorship.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to pilot and evaluate a human-centered injury thrivorship pathway in injury survivors. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is the pathway appropriate, acceptable, and feasible to meet the medical and social needs of injury survivors? Injury survivors will be purposively sampled to enroll in the pathway and asked to participate in in-depth interviews and their use of pathway resources will be tracked.
Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) framework, an engineering-based approach to efficiently and systematically develop, optimize, and evaluate behavioral interventions, this study will test three components: (1) 1:1 counseling with a registered dietitian, (2) behavioral skills development, and (3) group support for delivery alongside a core nutrition curriculum within a clinical exercise oncology program.
The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a brief psychotherapy intervention to improve psychosocial coping and maintain couple relationships among young adults (aged 25-39) with cancer and their caregiving partners.
Treatment summary and survivorship care plans (TSSPs) are poorly studied in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients, and given the high frequency of unmet needs, this patient population has potentially the most to benefit from the implementation of TSSPs. A preliminary feasibility randomized control trial (RCT) at London Regional Cancer Program (LRCP) of 18 patients with HNC evaluating the implementation of TSSPs, found that patients assigned to the intervention group had a 15% higher rate of physician implementation of survivorship care needs compared to the usual care group (40% versus 25%, respectively). Results of the pilot study indicated that successful execution of TSSPs and counselling sessions for HNC patients is feasible. In follow up to the initial feasibility trial, the present investigation seeks to execute a large-scale single arm trial to evaluate a TSSP and counselling intervention specifically tailored to the needs of this vulnerable cancer population. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the delivery of a TSSP during a one-on-one counselling session with HNC survivors to determine whether the intervention results in improved implementation of recommendations for HNC survivors. The investigators will aim to have 40% of survivorship recommendations implemented by 12 months post-intervention. Secondary study objectives will evaluate quality of life and satisfaction with care at 12 months post-intervention.
The objective of this study is 1) to study the acute and chronic effect of resistance therapeutic physical exercise (RTPE) in the prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in breast cancer survivors at risk using variables related to the lymphatic response; 2) Study the possible relationship between changes in body composition at a local and regional level and volume changes produced by RTPE in patients at risk of suffering from BCRL.
This study protocol describes the design and methods of the PanCareSurPass (PCSP) multi-country implementation study of the Survivorship Passport v2.0 (short: PCSP implementation study), which is part of the PCSP project that has received funding through the European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 Programme. The cohort study will inform researchers and stakeholders on the process and outcomes of implementing the Survivorship Passport (SurPass) v2.0 in the Electronic Health Information Systems (EHIS) of six clinics in the EU countries Austria (CCRI), Belgium (KU Leuven), Germany (UMC-Mainz/UzL), Italy (IGG), Lithuania (VULSK) and Spain (HULAFE). The SurPass comprises two main components, the Treatment Summary (TS) including demographic, diagnosis and treatment data and the personalized Survivorship Care Plan (SCP) including individual follow-up care recommendations. The SCP is based on internationally approved, organ-specific follow-up care recommendations. The SurPass is used as a tool to assist both Childhood Cancer Survivors (CCS) and Health Care Providers (HCPs) to improve Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) care, in a care partnership, supporting CCS empowerment and satisfaction with care, as well as shared decision-making by CCS and HCPs. People-centred care is important in CCS since they are a vulnerable population known to be at higher risk of developing chronic conditions as compared to their peers in the general population. The overall aim of the cohort study is to evaluate the implementation of the SurPass v2.0 in the six centres by testing the feasibility of test wise implementation of the SurPass v2.0 in different health system scenarios and assessing the people-centred LTFU care for CCS with the SurPass as a tool and the cost effectiveness. Six long term follow-up clinics across Europe will enrol eligible, consented CCS and generate personalised digital SurPass. Eligible participants for the main study cohort will be CCS more than 5 years after diagnosis and with an identified treatment burden based on actual exposure to respective treatments (Cumulative Treatment Doses (CTD) of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy). In preparation of the clinic visit, HCPs/local data monitors will use the SurPass v2.0 platform to generate the TS (semi-automated or manual data entry) from which, in turn, the preliminary SCP is automatically created using the built-in algorithms for each consented survivor. During the clinic visit the preliminary SCP is discussed with the Survivor, and tailored to meet the CCS personal needs and a final SCP will be generated. The SCP will include detailed country-specific recommendations, where applicable. The SurPass v2.0 (TS + SCP) will then be integrated into the institutional EHIS, as well as in the survivor's national/regional Electronic Health Platform (EHP) where available. CCS who give informed consent will complete (online) study questionnaires at two measuring points: before the visit to the clinic, and after they received the SurPass during the clinical visit. HCPs will also provide study data: the TS which went into the SurPass (clinical data) and data to monitor the implementation and assess the barriers and facilitators of implementing the SurPass. In addition, data will be collected from both survivors and health care providers to assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing the SurPass. Regarding the outcome evaluation, the main outcome is the change in levels of activation of survivor or caregiver, as assessed using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) prior and after clinic visit. Further measurements will be made related to: empowerment, satisfaction with the digital SurPass tool, emotional impacts, quality of life and additional costs of CCS. The main outcome will be analysed by multivariable logistic regression. Analysis for the secondary outcomes will be mostly descriptive. The economic assessment will be analysed by cost analysis, cost utility analysis and multi-criteria decision analysis. The study will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of good clinical practice (ICH/GCP) and the Helsinki Declaration. The investigators will carefully address all ethical, legal and safety aspects of the study and fully comply with prevailing national and EU regulations and legislation.
The improvement or preservation of quality of life (QoL) is one of the three pillars of the European Union (EU) Mission on Cancer, which underpins the needs of patients from cancer diagnosis throughout treatment, survivorship, and advanced terminal stages. Clinical studies and real-world data show that the use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for QoL assessment in routine oncology practice has positive effects on patient wellbeing and healthcare resource utilization. However, full implementation of PROMs is not yet part of standard of care and is not adequately considered in cancer policies and programs. A comprehensive tool incorporating the perspective of patients at different stages of the disease trajectory and widely applicable across Europe is still lacking. The European Oncology Quality of Life Toolkit (EUonQoL-Kit) is a unified patient-centred tool for the assessment of QoL, developed from preferences and priorities of people with past or current cancer experience. The EUonQoL-Kit includes three electronic questionnaires, specifically designed for different disease phases (patients in active treatment, survivors, and patients in palliative care), available in both static and dynamic (Computer Adaptive Testing, CAT) versions and in several European languages. This is a multicentre observational study, with the following aims: - The primary aim is to perform the psychometric validation of the EUonQoL-Kit. - Secondary aims are to assess its acceptability, to validate the CAT version, and to provide estimates of QoL across different European countries. The EUonQoL-Kit will be administered to a sample of cancer patients and survivors from 46 European cancer centres. The sample will include patients in active treatment (group A), survivors (group B), and patients in Palliative Care (group C). Each centre will recruit 100 patients (40 from group A, 30 from group B, 30 from group C), for an overall sample size of 4,600 patients (at least 4,000 patients are assumed to be enrolled, due to an expected lower recruitment rate of 10-15%). Three sub-samples of patients (each corresponding to 10% of the total sample for each centre) will fill in an additional questionnaire: - EORTC QLQ-C30, to test concurrent validity. - Live-CAT version, to test the feasibility of such implementation. - EUonQoL-Kit, 2-7 days after the first completion, to assess test-retest reliability.
The treatments that aim to cure cancer in children can lead to "late effects" such as second cancers and heart disease. Screening tests can help find late effects, but most adult survivors of childhood cancer do not complete these tests. These survivors are at risk for harm that can be prevented. The investigators have developed a program called ONLOOP to remind survivors in Ontario, Canada to get the screening tests they need. ONLOOP reminds survivors who are at higher risk for heart disease, breast cancer, and/or colorectal cancer to complete their echocardiograms, mammograms and breast MRIs, and/or colonoscopies. The goal of this clinical trial is to find out how well ONLOOP helps adult survivors of childhood cancer complete their screening tests. The investigators also want to see if it could be turned into a long-term program in Ontario. Eligible survivors will be randomly assigned to either receive intervention materials or continue with usual care for 13 months before receiving intervention materials. The intervention includes usual care plus these ONLOOP materials: 1. Study invitation letter and invitation reminder 2. Those who sign up for ONLOOP will receive personalized health information and a screening reminder. Survivors will receive information about: 1. their cancer treatment 2. their risk(s) for late effects 3. the screening tests they should do 3. Participants have the option to provide their family doctor's or nurse practitioner's contact information. For those who consent, the study team will send their family doctor or nurse practitioner a letter with details about their cancer diagnosis and treatment. The letter will also remind them to talk to their patient about their health and screening test(s) needed.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of the mHealth app in improving symptoms experienced by children in the early stage of cancer survivorship, including physical function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, peer relationships, and pain interference, and at improving the quality of life (QoL) of the children's primary caregivers The main question it aims to answer is whether survivors who receive the symptom management mHealth app intervention will report improved symptoms, i.e., improved physical function; lower levels of anxiety, depressive symptoms, and fatigue; better peer relationships; and lower pain interference 3 months after starting the intervention. Additionally, we hypothesized that the primary caregivers (either the mother or father) would report an improved QoL 3 months after starting the intervention. Participants in the intervention group will use the mHealth app for 12 weeks with personalised nurse support via interactive communication technologies. They are required to complete questionnaires at baseline (during medical follow-up), 1, 2, and 3 months (via electronic-based systems in the mobile app) Besides, semi-structured interviews and will be conducted to examine the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of the intervention.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the iCanWork intervention in assisting cancer survivors (CS) to return to work (RTW) and its impact on their health-related quality of life (QoL), health service utilization, RTW readiness, time to RTW, and work capacity.