Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03764046
Other study ID # SNUMR2-2
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date January 1, 2019
Est. completion date December 31, 2019

Study information

Verified date December 2018
Source Seoul National University Hospital
Contact Jin-Tae Kim, MD, PhD
Phone +82-2-2072-3664
Email jintae73@gmail.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The numeric rating scale (NRS), one of the most widely used pain scales in clinical practice, although convenient, is often subject to bias because it requires abstract thinking from both the patient and the evaluator. Compared to numbers, traumatic pain, when visualized appropriately, has potential advantage as a means to indicate and communicate the severity of pain. Given that they are standardized in terms of body parts, wound size, and bleeding volume, illustrations of traumatic pain along with external somatic stimuli that caused it can be used to serve as effective visual anchors to supplement a pain scale by giving more concrete information to the patient. The purpose of this study is to develop Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale(SNUIPS) using pictures of traumatic pain, and verify the validity and effectiveness of this scale in comparison with those of NRS.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 100
Est. completion date December 31, 2019
Est. primary completion date October 31, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 79 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Adult patients undergoing a gynecological or orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia

- Administered with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain control

- American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I-III patients

Exclusion Criteria:

- Contraindicated against fentanyl

- Unable to communicate

- Aged less than 18, or more than 79

- Weighs less than 40kg or more than 89kg

- Has severe heart disease(s)

- Pregnant

Study Design


Locations

Country Name City State
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Hospital Seoul

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Seoul National University Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Korea, Republic of, 

References & Publications (11)

Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1356-61. — View Citation

Bond MR, Pilowsky I. Subjective assessment of pain and its relationship to the administration of analgesics in patients with advanced cancer. J Psychosom Res. 1966 Sep;10(2):203-8. — View Citation

Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16. Review. — View Citation

Eriksson K, Wikström L, Årestedt K, Fridlund B, Broström A. Numeric rating scale: patients' perceptions of its use in postoperative pain assessments. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Feb;27(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2013.10.006. Epub 2013 Oct 31. — View Citation

Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974 Nov 9;2(7889):1127-31. — View Citation

Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986 Oct;27(1):117-26. — View Citation

Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O. A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use? Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):707-714. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 6. Review. — View Citation

Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999 Apr;79(2):231-52. Review. — View Citation

Noble B, Clark D, Meldrum M, ten Have H, Seymour J, Winslow M, Paz S. The measurement of pain, 1945-2000. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Jan;29(1):14-21. — View Citation

Pathak A, Sharma S, Jensen MP. The utility and validity of pain intensity rating scales for use in developing countries. Pain Reports [Internet] 2018;3(5):e672. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000672

Singer T, Seymour B, O'Doherty J, Kaube H, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1157-62. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS) Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 24 hours after surgery. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity. 24 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS) Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 24.5 hours after surgery for validation in terms of test-retest reliability of the scale. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity. 24.5 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS) Self-reported pain intensity based on numeric rating scale evaluated after 48 hours after surgery for assessment of sensitivity to change. Each item is scored from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst imaginable pain). 48 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS) Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 24 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'. Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity. 24 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS) Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 24.5 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'. Retrospective assessment of peak postoperative pain intensity will be included in addition to evaluation of current pain intensity. 24.5 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Pain Scores (SNUIPS) Self-reported pain intensity based on Seoul National University Illustrated Pain Scale evaluated after 48 hours after surgery. Each item is scored using illustrations that corresponds to 0-10 levels of traumatic pain, beginning from 'no injury and/or pain' to 'causalgia'. 48 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics 24 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics 24.5 hours after surgery
Primary Postoperative Consumption of Patient-Controlled and/or Rescue Analgesics Amount of analgesics consumed through intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and/or administration of rescue analgesics 48 hours after surgery
Primary Understandability of Pain Scales Survey among patients on understandability pain scales 48 hours after surgery
Primary Convenience of Pain Scales Survey among patients on convenience of pain scales 48 hours after surgery
Primary Patient Satisfaction of Postoperative Pain Management Survey among patients on their level of overall satisfaction on postoperative pain management 48 hours after surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05583916 - Same Day Discharge for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Lung Surgery N/A
Completed NCT04448041 - CRANE Feasibility Study: Nutritional Intervention for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Completed NCT03213314 - HepaT1ca: Quantifying Liver Health in Surgical Candidates for Liver Malignancies N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05534490 - Surgery and Functionality in Older Adults N/A
Recruiting NCT04792983 - Cognition and the Immunology of Postoperative Outcomes
Terminated NCT04612491 - Pre-operative Consultation on Patient Anxiety and First-time Mohs Micrographic Surgery
Recruiting NCT06397287 - PROM Project Urology
Recruiting NCT04444544 - Quality of Life and High-Risk Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Completed NCT04204785 - Noise in the OR at Induction: Patient and Anesthesiologists Perceptions N/A
Completed NCT03432429 - Real Time Tissue Characterisation Using Mass Spectrometry REI-EXCISE iKnife Study
Completed NCT04176822 - Designing Animated Movie for Preoperative Period N/A
Recruiting NCT05370404 - Prescribing vs. Recommending Over-The-Counter (PROTECT) Analgesics for Patients With Postoperative Pain: N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05467319 - Ferric Derisomaltose/Iron Isomaltoside and Outcomes in the Recovery of Gynecologic Oncology ERAS Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04602429 - Children's Acute Surgical Abdomen Programme
Completed NCT03124901 - Accuracy of Noninvasive Pulse Oximeter Measurement of Hemoglobin for Rainbow DCI Sensor N/A
Completed NCT04595695 - The Effect of Clear Masks in Improving Patient Relationships N/A
Recruiting NCT06103136 - Maestro 1.0 Post-Market Registry
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT04059328 - Novel Surgical Checklists for Gynecologic Laparoscopy in Haiti
Recruiting NCT03697278 - Monitoring Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia (PCA) N/A