Clinical Trials Logo

Surgery clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Surgery.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03307798 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Evaluate a Saw Bone Training Protocol in Using Tactile Sensation to Classify Bone Quality During Implant Surgery

SBTP
Start date: September 20, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Bone quality is one of the major factors influencing the dental implant survival rate. Bone quality is believed to have effects on initial implant stability and success of osseointegration. Different implant designs and surgical protocols were developed for improving the survival rate in different bone quality. Although bone quality can be partly diagnosed by radiographic images, lots of experienced surgeons also evaluate bone quality with tactile sensation when they drill the bone. However, variations in evaluation of bone density maybe exist among different surgeons. For less experienced dentists, it is difficult to diagnose bone quality with tactile sensation in the beginning. This purpose of this study is to evaluate a training protocol in using tactile sensation to classify bone quality during implant surgery. Saw bones of variant densities are used as training materials. The outcomes before and after training will be compared. The effect of training frequency before surgery will also be evaluated.

NCT ID: NCT03284983 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Split Scar Study to Assess Cosmetic Outcome From Differing Suture Spacing

SFD
Start date: July 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigators wish to determine how suture spacing (5 mm vs. 10 mm) affects cosmetic outcome and development of "train tracking" in wounds. Linear wounds with sutures spaced closer together may not be as cosmetically appealing when compared to those that have larger spacing between sutures. Suturing closer together constricts blood flow and increases tension that ultimately results in more tissue necrosis and a less appealing outcome. The investigators also aim to conclude if 5 mm or 10 mm suture spacing results in less complications.

NCT ID: NCT03274050 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

To Evaluate the Performance and Efficiency of Robotic Surgery in Children and Adults

PECRoP
Start date: February 28, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Robotic minimally invasive surgery has been rapidly adopted for a wide variety of surgical procedures in adult patients across a broad spectrum of surgical specialties. This has occurred despite the high costs and uncertain benefits of surgical robots. In contrast, Children's Hospitals and pediatric surgical disciplines have been much slower to embrace the surgical robot. Many children's hospitals do not even possess a surgical robot, and many of those that do borrow them from the adult operating room within the same medical facility. Since the first case of robotic minimally invasive surgery in children in 2000, robotic procedures have been slowly adopted by select pediatric surgical specialists. Advocates of robotic minimally invasive surgical systems add many useful features that include improved dexterity, motion scaling, tremor filtration, greater optical magnification (up to 10x), stereoscopic vision, operator-controlled camera movement, and the elimination of the fulcrum effect when compared to conventional laparoscopy. The wristed laparoscopic instruments used in robotic surgery provide seven degrees of freedom. For the surgeon, these features may allow for more precise dissection with increased magnification and visibility. The intuitive controls of the robot are purported as providing the ability to perform laparoscopic procedures in an "open" fashion. In pediatric surgical procedures, these technical abilities may have the potential to surpass the physical capabilities of human performance in the tight operative fields encountered in children. This study aims to evaluate the clinical safety and efficiency in a dedicated multidisciplinary pediatric program and to evaluate the relative cost of robotic surgery

NCT ID: NCT03268044 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Surgical Admission at the Weekend and 30-day Mortality in Ontario, Canada: a Matched Cohort Study

Start date: October 18, 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Surgery is performed at the weekend for risk to life or limb, when mandated by clinical guidelines, or depending on resource availability. Weekend healthcare interventions have been associated with increased mortality and adverse clinical outcomes in the majority of the literature examining the weekend effect, but these findings are not consistent. Results from recent observational studies argue against a true weekend effect. Higher rates of adverse outcomes associated with hospital activity at weekends do not appear to be due to altered medical staffing as commonly hypothesized, but are thought to be in part a result of data artefact and confounding by severity or indication. For this study, we hypothesized that patients who are admitted to hospital at the weekend and require surgery have an increased risk of death compared with patients who are admitted and undergo surgery on weekdays. The primary aim was to examine whether patients who underwent surgery and were admitted at the weekend had an increased risk of 30 day all-cause mortality compared with patients who were admitted and underwent surgery on weekdays; secondary aim was to examine whether the timing of surgery (i.e., surgery on the same weekend or surgery on a subsequent weekday) for patients admitted at the weekend is associated with increased risk of 30 day all-cause mortality.

NCT ID: NCT03218306 Recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) Versus Standard Clinical Approach Analgesia

SPIDER
Start date: October 23, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study is aimed at confronting a surgical pleth index based protocol for intraoperative analgesia in a desflurane based general anesthesia for thyroidectomy, versus a standard clinical approach. A reduction in analgesic consumption and improvement in hemodynamics are expected.

NCT ID: NCT03185754 Recruiting - Lung Cancer Clinical Trials

Comparison of Sublobar Resection and Lobectomy to Treat Lung Cancer

Start date: June 12, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

A multi-center prospective randomized trial in Taiwan to investigate whether sublobar resection, as compared to lobectomy, can offer equivalent clinical results to treat early non-small cell lung cancer.

NCT ID: NCT03175783 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Use of Wearable Activity Tracker in Elderly Undergoing Abdominal Surgery

Start date: July 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Early mobilization is an important element in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). It reduces risk of conditions which are related to prolonged bed rest such as deep vein thrombosis, lung atelectasis, pneumonia, and sacral sore. (Appelboom, Taylor et al. 2015) It is also associated with shortened length of hospital stay, improved survival, and reduction in health care cost. However, "early mobilization" was not defined consistently in previous study. Some authors recommend patients to get out of bed and ambulate on the day of operation while others define as getting out of bed more than 2 hours on day of operation and up to 8 hours on second post-operative day. (Wolk, Meissner et al. 2017) The inconsistency in definition is partly due to the inability to quantify patients' mobility which is usually self-reported by patients and is subjective.(Eva van der Meij 2017) This is especially true for elderly patient in whom preoperative mobility varies significantly between individuals. For this reason, the approach of early mobilization in elderly should be goal directed and individualized according to their preoperative mobility and functional status. The aim of current study is to monitor and motivate elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery to increase postoperative mobilization by using Fitbit Zip activity tracker.

NCT ID: NCT03142906 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Perioperative Point-of-Care Ultrasound

POCUS-RCT
Start date: April 4, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The goal of this study is to assess the impact of perioperative point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) assessment on patient-important outcomes (e.g. hospital length of stay, length of stay in recovery, mortality etc.) and perioperative patient management strategies, in patients undergoing non-elective non-cardiac surgeries.

NCT ID: NCT03138213 Recruiting - Surgery Clinical Trials

Comparing Total Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Start date: May 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Introduction Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most complex abdominal operations to perform, and it is usually conducted for tumours of the periampullary region and chronic pancreatitis. Minimally invasive surgery has been progressively being developed for pancreatic surgery, first with the advent of hybrid-laparoscopy and recently with total laparoscopic surgery. Issues including the safety and efficacy of total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) are currently being debated. Studies comparing these two surgical techniques are emerging, and large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking but are clearly required. Methods and analysis TJDBPS01 is a multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled, parallel-group, superiority trial in fourteen centres with pancreatic surgery experts who have performed ≥104 TLPDs and OPDs. A total of 656 patients who will undergo PD are randomly allocated to the TLPD group or OPD group in a 1:1 ratio. The trial hypothesis is that TLPD has superior or equivalent safety and advantages in postoperative recovery compared with OPD. The primary outcome is the postoperative length of stay (LOS). Ethics and dissemination The Instituitional Review Board Approval of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology has approved this trial and will be routinely monitoring the trial at frequent intervals, as will an independent third-party organization. Any results from this trial (publications, conference presentations) will be published in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings.

NCT ID: NCT03126279 Recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

fMRI and Central Sensitization in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis. A Pre and Post TKR Study

Start date: August 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

Painful osteoarthritis (OA) is the 4th largest cause of disability in the UK. Preoperative temporal summation, a measure of central pain facilitation, has been shown to predict postoperative pain after total knee replacement surgery (TKR). The assessment of the brain's response to noxious stimuli using non-invasive functional MRI (fMRI) may be key in identifying imaging biomarkers within the brain that map central sensitization changes seen in OA. fMRI may help explain why up to 20% of patients undergoing TKR surgery develop persistent post-operative pain. To test these concepts the study aims to functionally characterise the brain activity related to temporal summation of pain in healthy individuals and OA patients using a novel fMRI cuff algometer. Assessment of outcomes in terms of pain and function will be performed 6 months post TKR surgery