View clinical trials related to Substance-Related Disorders.
Filter by:Drug-related deaths (DRD) are a significant and increasing public health problem in Scotland. Benzodiazepines and BZD-type substances (BZD) are increasingly implicated in DRD. In 2018, BZDs were implicated in 67% of DRD, often in combination with other illicit and prescribable substances including Opiate Replacement Therapies (ORT) such as methadone and buprenorphine. Illicit BZD use and dependence is higher among people with other substance use disorders. 29% of patients presenting to Scottish addiction services report current illicit BZD use. There is widespread variance in approaches to the clinical management of BZD dependence among people with opioid use disorder in Scotland. Some addiction clinicians are reluctant to prescribe BZD to people on ORT, some will prescribe BZD with the primary aim of dose reduction and detoxification, others will consider longer-term maintenance prescribing whilst patients stabilise on ORT. Previous research has identified increased risks of mortality among people taking BZD and ORT. Other work suggests that co-prescribing BZD and ORT increases patient engagement and retention in addiction treatment. This retrospective cohort study will analyse anonymised, linked data on people who received ORT between 01/01/2010 and 31/12/2020 to explore any relationships between exposure (co-prescribing of BZD and ORT) and harms including: mortality (all-cause and DRD), hospitalisation, illicit drug use during ORT, and reduced retention in addiction care.
In this study we research patient segmentation made by Suuntima-service and it´s impacts to Quality of care, Service use and Costs of care among Type 2 Diabetes patients and Substance Abuse patients. With this Suuntima-servise based segmentation we assume to find appropriate services and Self-Management to allocate Type 2 Diabetes and Substance Abuse patients. We plan their care pathways by Suuntiman-service customership strategies (Self-acting, community, co-operation, network).
Forensic patients often display cognitive deficits, particularly in the domain of executive functions, that represent a challenge to forensic rehabilitation. One empirically-validated method to train executive functions is cognitive remediation, which consists of cognitive exercises combined with coaching. This trial investigates whether cognitive remediation can improve cognitive, functional, and clinical outcomes in forensic inpatients.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a major public health concern that disproportionately effects minorities and those with low-socioeconomic status, such as homeless women, creating a critical health disparity. PTSD has been linked with dysregulated hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) functioning and increased inflammation, which can lead to long-term physical-health problems and PTSD-symptom maintenance, exacerbating disparities. Mindfulness-based interventions, including Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR), have shown promise as a complementary tool for addressing PTSD in veterans and with low-income, minority populations, but homeless women have not been examined adequately. MBSR may improve PTSD symptomatology and help modulate the dysregulated stress response common in individuals with PTSD, improving physical and mental health concurrently. This project is an open-label, parallel, modified-cross over clinical trial of a modified-MBSR intervention to reduce PTSD symptoms in homeless women and to explore physiological correlates of treatment-response. Hypotheses: 1. Participation in an MBSR-based intervention will be associated with clinically significant reduction in PTSD (primary outcome), lower depression symptoms and greater drug and alcohol abstinence (secondary outcomes) compared to participation in an attention control. 2. Compared to an attention control, participants in an MBSR-based intervention group will demonstrate improvements in cortisol reactivity and lower inflammation. At baseline, women will complete psychosocial assessments (e.g., depression, substance use, trauma history) and participate in a brief stress task, providing salivary samples before and after the task (which will be assayed for cortisol and C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation). Women will then participate in 1) a 9-session MBSR-based program that was modified based on an initial qualitative component that involved a Community Advisory Board and focus groups with women from the community (N=4 focus groups; 28 women total) or 2) a nine-session health-promotion course (i.e., attention-control condition). Follow-up assessments that include psychosocial and biological data will occur immediately after final intervention session and again 6-months later. Clinically-meaningful improvements in PTSD (primary outcome) and secondary outcomes (e.g., depression, substance use, inflammation, cortisol reactivity) will be examined.
Background: The negative health outcomes experienced by Indigenous peoples may be understood as direct consequences of colonization. One of the key consequences of the colonial influence on Canada's Indigenous peoples has been intergenerational trauma (IGT). Indigenous communities in Canada face significant challenges with IGT, which often manifest in substance use disorders (SUD). Indigenous communities have identified SUD as one of their greatest health challenges(Maté 2009), with some Northern Ontario First Nations communities experiencing SUD rates of 70% (Calveson 2010). Most Elders, traditional healers, and Indigenous scholars agree that connecting treatment to culture, land, community, and spiritual practices is a pathway to healing trauma and SUD for Indigenous peoples. Recent work by Dr. Teresa Naseba Marsh has demonstrated that Indigenous Healing and Seeking Safety (IHSS) model for trauma therapy can be effectively combined for the treatment of Indigenous patients with a history of trauma and SUD. Seeking Safety incorporates the inclusion of the mind, body, spirit, and self-awareness during treatment, and the perspective of Seeking Safety is convergent with traditional Indigenous healing methods. Benbowopka Treatment Centre is a residential treatment site operated by Mamaweswen, located in the North Shore Tribal Council in Blind River, Ontario. Benbowopka's mandate is to provide treatment for Indigenous clients with trauma and SUD. They are also implementing a culturally sensitive program grounded in IHSS methodology for the treatment of Indigenous patients' trauma and SUD. Through our current collaboration with Benbowopka and Mamaweswen the applicants have collected baseline data from client files to establish historical outcomes going back three years. In 2016, we began the collaborative implementation of the Indigenous Healing and Seeking Safety (IHSS) model for trauma therapy for clients at Benbowopka. Objective: The purpose of this proposal is to evaluate the effectiveness of the IHSS intervention which blends Indigenous Healing Practices and a mainstream treatment model, Seeking Safety for the treatment of Indigenous patients with a history of trauma and SUD. Methodology: In collaboration with the North Shore Tribal Council and the Benbowopka Treatment Center, we propose a prospective evaluation of IHSS treatment for Indigenous patients with a history of trauma and SUD. Benbowopka treats approximately 90 patients per year in a residential treatment program, and the program has high quality retrospective data on their programming and outcomes. We propose to benchmark anonymized historical program outcomes by evaluating program outcomes and the impact of program completion on health systems usage. Impact of treatment on health system usage will be determined by linking anonymized patient records with records at the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences (ICES). ICES linkage will provide further insight into hospitalizations, interaction with emergency, mental health, and primary care usage before and following the implementation of the IHSS intervention. We will respect the Tricouncil Policy Statement, Chapter 9, which highlights the importance of engaging with First Nations throughout all phases of the research process. In addition, we will honour Indigenous knowledge by engaging with Elders and the North Shore Tribal council. Through the data governance protocols established at ICES, we will respect the First Nations principles of ownership, control, access and possession of data (OCAP™). Dr. Jennifer Walker Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Health at the Center for Rural and Northern Health Research and ICES Scientist will oversee the process of data sharing and linking de-identified Benbowopka treatment data to anonymized health system data at ICES. Benbowopka and the North Shore Tribal council will maintain complete ownership over the study data and its subsequent dissemination. Anticipated Outcome: We expect that patients who are treated in the IHSS treatment model will have improved outcomes as compared to previous patients of Benbowopka treated under the abstinence based model of therapy. Objectives measures will include treatment completion, substance use at program completion, substance use at follow-up, ED visits, hospitalization, and death. Patient satisfaction will be tracked using surveys administered at treatment completion and is expected to improve with implementation of IHSS. Impact: We expect to demonstrate that the IHSS is a culturally sensitive and effective treatment model for Indigenous patients who are affected by trauma and substance use disorder.
Our purpose is to conduct a 4-arm placebo-controlled clinical trial to investigate the relative clinical efficacy of 300 mg. of pure hemp-derived CBD isolate, 300 mg. of full spectrum CBD oil, 300 mg. of broad- spectrum CBD Oil, or Placebo oil among adults presenting with COVID-19 -induced stress reactions including one or more of the following: anxiety, depression, anger, substance use, or sleep disturbance.
This is a research study to assess the effectiveness of a peer-led collaborative care model for integrating treatment for substance use and or mental health disorders into HIV care settings. Depending on whether or not participants enroll in this study, participants will be assigned randomly (by chance, like drawing a number from a hat) to one of two groups. In group 1, participants would receive usual clinical care. In group 2, participants would work with a peer-case manager who would help support participants to engage in substance use or mental health disorder care. Regardless of the group participants are in, participants will fill out a survey when first enrolled in the study, and then again 12 months later.
At the age of 17, in Brittany, 94.9% of adolescents have experimented alcohol consumption 78.1% within a month and 25.5% report repeated episodes of Intensive Punctual Alcohol. Among the potential explanatory factors of this worrying epidemiology, social and cultural factors induce a social valuation of alcohol consumption and drunkenness. There are also individual vulnerability factors, particularly important in adolescence between experimentation and the transition to regular use or even to alcohol use disorders. Despite the extent of the damage, there is currently little reliable data on effective primary prevention strategies for dealing with addictive behavior. Many prevention programs target age range in school settings, to delay or reduce use of psychoactive substances. A meta-analysis on the impact of this prevention programs in school settings, concluded that most interventions are associated with no or little impact with respect to the goal of reducing psychoactive substances with teenagers. Among existing programs, "PREVENTURE" has been evaluated in 5 trials with high-risk teenagers identified in schools settings, in different countries (Canada, Europe). The results show a clear and robust effect on reducing alcohol consumption. This program has not been tested outside the school setting and a recent review mention the need to make this program more accessible by targeting vulnerable groups and studying the impact of this program on this population. The PREVADO study is a prospective, controlled, randomised, open-label study. After inclusion, the adolescent completes the questionnaire SURPS (Substance Use Risk Profile Scale). The SURPS is self-report questionnaire that assesses four well-validated personality risk factors for substance misuse (Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking, Anxiety Sensitivity, and Hopelessness). There is a 23-item to which adolescents are asked to respond using a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" : Hopelessness (7 items), Anxiety Sensitivity (5 items), Impulsivity (5 items), and Sensation Seeking (6 items). Adolescents will be randomized into 2 groups (stratification on the 4 predominant risk personality types from the SURPS (Substance Use Risk Profile Scale) and on the recruitment modality) : - Intervention group : teenagers follow the "PREVENTURE" program and routine cares - Control group : teenagers follow routine cares
This 3-arm study compares the effectiveness of an (1) 8-week mindfulness-based intervention, MBCT-R (Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Resilience During COVID-19)+CHA MindWell vs. (2) iCBT (internet based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy)+ CHA MindWell vs. (3) CHA MindWell remote monitoring and telephone coaching alone on depressive symptoms as measured over the course of 24-weeks by the computerized adaptive mental health (CAT-MH) interview for depression (CAT-DI). Secondary outcomes include rates and levels of alcohol and drug use, as well as the number of required mental health clinician visits (televisits and in-person visits). Exploratory outcomes include stress-related affect reactivity and salivary inflammatory markers (e.g., interleukin-6).
This project is designed to test the Coalition Check-Up (CCU)-a theory-based and data-driven technical assistance (TA) system that supports community coalitions' implementation of evidence-based programs (EBPs) for drug prevention. The primary aims of the project are to: 1) Estimate the impact of the CCU on coalition capacity. Coalitions will be randomly assigned to the CCU or a 'TA as usual' condition to evaluate whether the CCU improves coalition capacity as measured by coalition member reports of team processes, network composition, and collaborative structure. 2) Estimate the impact of the CCU on implementation of evidence-based programs. The study will test the hypothesis that coalitions receiving the CCU will implement EBPs with greater: a) quantity, b) quality, and c) sustainability. The study will also test coalition capacity as a mediator of CCU impact on EBP implementation. 3) Estimate the impact of the CCU on youth substance use. The study will test the hypothesis that communities receiving the CCU will reduce youth substance use relative to communities in the comparison condition. The study will also test EBP implementation as a mediator of CCU impact on youth substance use.