View clinical trials related to Stroke, Acute.
Filter by:Strokes is amajor cause of death and disabilities in different countried
This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, single-arm, non-randomized study to assess the safety and feasibility of external active conductive head cooling during endovascular thrombectomy procedures.
This domain has a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group with blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE) design. Up to 4,000 patients with presumed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) will be followed for 90 days (or until death, if prior to 90 days). The end of the trial is defined as the date that all participants have completed their Day 90 assessment. This domain aim is to efficiently, reliably, and simultaneously, determine the comparative effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) using standard-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight), vs. low-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg body weight) in all patients who present to hospital with acute ischemic stroke and are considered for intravenous thrombolysis. In addition, this domain also seeks to study standard-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight), vs. low-dose intravenous tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg body weight) vs. no TNK upfront with rescue IA TNK if necessary (in those eligible for emergency EVT) and no TNK upfront in those who have taken DOACs during the preceding 24 hours. This domain therefore seeks to generate more robust randomized evidence to guide clinicians in their decisions over the balance of risks and treatment with intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase wherever such evidence is currently insufficient. This domain will currently evaluate four research questions in relation to the use of IVT with tenecteplase: 1. In patients with recent (24 hours) intake of a standard-dose direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), how should IVT be used? - Use standard-dose (0.25 mg/kg body weight) or low-dose tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg) or not at all. 2. In patients planned to be treated with endovascular thrombectomy, how should tenecteplase be used? -Treat with IV tenecteplase (standard- or low-dose) or not at all. 3. In any patient receiving IVT, what is the optimal dose of tenecteplase? - use standard-dose (0.25 mg/kg body weight) or low-dose tenecteplase (0.18 mg/kg). 4. To what extent is the treatment effect of standard- vs. low-dose tenecteplase modified by key patient characteristics, such as diabetes, prior antiplatelet therapy, renal failure, or frailty, old age or having a heavy burden of cerebral small vessel disease on brain imaging.
The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of the CE-marked wearable system Stroke Alarm to identify the onset of a stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset. This is a multicenter, prospective observational single-arm trial with a registry-based propensity matched control population. A total of 500 patients will be included in the trial. An interim analysis will determine if the stroke onset frequency is sufficient to determine the main outcome. Should the number of stroke events differ from what is expected at interim analysis, study enrollment will continue to increase cohort size. Patients who meet the criteria for participation will, after signing consent, be included and receive the Stroke Alarm bracelets that are used for 3 months. Study data will be collected as baseline at inclusion, at follow-up 3 months after inclusion and by using national Swedish registry data after completion of the study. Patients with elevated stroke risk according assessed by presence of specific criteria associated with elevated risk caused by: 1. recent TIA, OR 2. recent stroke without persisting arm motor deficit, OR 3. atrial fibrillation A control population matched for age, sex, NIHSS score and health care region will be identified in the Swedish national stroke registry, Riksstroke, and used for comparison. The combined efficacy goal is at least 60% sensitivity for Stroke Alarm b of stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset (with a 95% confidence interval above 30%) and a specificity of at least 80% using a clinical stroke diagnosis as gold standard.
The goal of this longitudinal interventional study is to integrate the enriched environment (EE) in the context of the Neurology Clinic ward of the General Hospital - University of Padua, by verifying its effectiveness and impact on psychological well-being, functional recovery, activity level, and quality of life in people with stroke.
The goal of this prospective observational study is to assess the effectiveness and performance of Methinks AI stroke imaging software platform in acute Code Stroke patients, and as a comparator to study sites utilizing existing AI imaging stroke platforms. The main question[s] it aims to answer is: • Performance of and outcomes associated with the use of the Methinks AI stroke imaging medical device in real-world clinical practice.
Most stroke patients are initially evaluated at the closest hospital but some need to be transferred to a hospital that can provide more advanced care. The "Door-In-Door-Out" (DIDO) process at the first hospital can take time making transferred patients no longer able to get the advanced treatments. This study will help hospitals across the US "stand up" new ways to evaluate stroke patients, decide who needs to be transferred, and transfer them quickly for advanced treatment.
This is a multicenter, open-label, evaluator-blinded, investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial, to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of LF-rTMS in reducing infarct size, reducing disability rate and improving functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke within 48 hours after stroke onset.
PRESSURE is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open, blinded end-point assessed (PROBE) trial, that aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-induced hypertension using peripheral dilute norepinephrine, in patients with acute ischemic stroke in a perforating artery territory and experiencing early neurological deterioration.
There have been limited studies on delirium in patients hospitalized with acute stroke. There have been no studies on the potential impact of overnight neuro-checks and resulting sleep disruption on delirium or other outcomes. Additional research is needed to determine if overnight checks are necessary or even harmful. We aim to find out if stopping overnight neuro checks may prevent delirium and benefit the patient.