Clinical Trials Logo

Staff Attitude clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Staff Attitude.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06170879 Recruiting - Staff Attitude Clinical Trials

What is the Experience of the Professional Nurse Advocates (PNAs) Application of the A-EQUIP Model Into Practice

Start date: September 21, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The study will utilise focus groups with trained PNAs from different Trusts spread over the Midlands region within England. This approach will help explore the experiences and views of trained PNAs in the application of the role and the foundations on which it is supported. It will also supply valuable feedback regarding the preparation, implementation, and outcome of adopting the PNA position with health care organisations, as there is a suggestion that the role could expand from England to the United Kingdom and possibly the United States of America.

NCT ID: NCT05919589 Recruiting - Healthy Clinical Trials

Evaluating Care Integration for Children With Special Health Care Needs v1.0

Start date: November 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The Evelina London Children's Hospital (ELCH) is planning to integrate care for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) using a package of support, including 1) family support workers to manage care coordination and support parents, and 2) 'navigation' packs outlining key services, for both the services users and providers. This study aims to explore the views and experiences of key stakeholders involved with these services, including the parents/caregivers of CSHCN, and professionals/staff team members. These will be explored using semi-structured qualitative interviews.

NCT ID: NCT05917574 Recruiting - Critical Illness Clinical Trials

A Study to Evaluate the Introduction of New Staffing Models in Intensive Care: a Realist Evaluation (SEISMIC-R)

SEISMIC-R
Start date: June 14, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Background: Staffing in intensive care units (ICU) has been in the spotlight since the pandemic. Having enough nurses to deliver safe, quality care in ICU is important. However, what the skill mix should be (how many should be qualified nurses or have an ICU qualification) is unclear. Very little research has been done to look at which nursing staff combinations and mix of skills works best in ICU to support patients (described as 'staffing models').Research shows that there is a link between the quality of nurse staffing and poor patient outcomes, including deaths. Aim: Our research plans to look at different staffing models across the UK. This study aims to examine new staffing models in ICU across six very different Trusts. This study will use a research technique called Realist Evaluation that examines what works best in different situations and help to understand why some things work for some people and not others. The design of this approach will help to better understand the use of different staff ratios across different ICU settings. This study will examine what combinations of staff numbers and skills result in better patient care and improved survival rates. The aim is to produce a template that every ICU unit can use. To do this, this study will compare staffing levels with how well patients recover, and seek to understand the decisions behind staffing combinations. Methods: This study will: 1. carry out a national survey to understand the different staff models being used, comparing this against the current national standard (n=294 ICUs in the UK including Scotland) 2. observe how people at work in 6 hospitals (called ethnography), watching how they make decisions around staffing and the effect on patients. The investigators will also conduct interviews (30 interviews plus 30 ethnographic observations) to understand staffing decisions. 3. look at ICU staffing patterns and models, and linked patient outcomes (such as whether people survive ICU) over 3 years (2019-2023) in those hospitals, including with a very different combination of staffing). The investigators will then carry out some mathematical calculations to understand the best possible staffing combinations, and how this varies.

NCT ID: NCT05713305 Recruiting - Anxiety Clinical Trials

Effect of an Online Self-help Psychological Intervention on Non-ICU Specialty Care During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Start date: January 18, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Timely interventions may reduce the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in ICU medical staff. Existing research suggests that either self-learning psychological relief methods or seeking online counseling or therapy from professional psychotherapists during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak has the potential to alleviate the emotional distress and promote the physical and mental health of health care workers. Web-based online mental health interventions complemented by joint effective mental health advice can further reduce harmful negative effects.

NCT ID: NCT05618678 Active, not recruiting - Dementia Clinical Trials

Pilot Testing Decision Making in Aging and Dementia for Autonomy Program in Nursing Homes

DIGNITY
Start date: January 24, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to adapt, pilot test, and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of DIGNITY (Decision-making In aGing and demeNtIa for auTonomY) for Preference-Based Care in Nursing Homes as a new evidence-based intervention to support nursing home staff to safely honor care and activity preferences of residents' living with dementia in rural, typically under resourced nursing home communities.

NCT ID: NCT04792268 Completed - Diabetes Mellitus Clinical Trials

Electronic Clinical Decision Support for Diabetes and Dysglycaemia in Secondary Mental Healthcare

Start date: May 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

People with serious mental illness (SMI) such as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar affective disorder have a significantly reduced life expectancy, caused in part by increased incidences of mortality from physical health conditions such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Electronic clinical decision support systems (eCDSS) offer clinicians patient-specific advice and recommendations based on clinical guidelines, theoretically overcoming obstacles in the use of existing paper-based guidelines. Adoption of eCDSS to address CVD risk in people with SMI presents a unique opportunity for research, but requires evidence of acceptability and feasibility before scaling up of research. The key objective of this study is to establish the feasibility and acceptability of an eCDSS (CogStack @ Maudsley) compromising a real-time electronic health record powered alerting and clinical decision support system for diabetes management in secondary inpatient mental healthcare settings. End-users of the eCDSS will be clinicians only. Firstly we will conduct initial surveys and interviews with clinicians on inpatient wards to scope experiences of managing diabetes in secondary mental healthcare settings and attitudes towards use of digital technologies to aid in clinical decision making. A feasibility study will then be run to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of implementing eCDSS on inpatient wards. This will involve a cluster RCT on inpatient general adult psychiatry wards, where 4 months of eCDSS use by clinicians on intervention wards will be compared to 4 months of treatment as usual on control wards. All clinicians on recruited wards will be eligible to participate. At the end of the study, participating clinicians on intervention wards will be invited to take part in a survey and interview which will explore their experiences and attitudes towards using the eCDSS, and an implementation science framework will be applied to inform future implementation of eCDSS. Group level pseudonymised outcome data will be gathered through a separate study.

NCT ID: NCT04709926 Withdrawn - Staff Attitude Clinical Trials

Paramedic Experiences and Perceptions of Training for Participation in Research: the PREPARE Study

PREPARE
Start date: September 9, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The investigators are currently conducting a research study, called PRESTO, in the pre-hospital environment where the investigators are asking paramedics to talk to patients about participating in the research study, interpret a heart tracing (or ECG), take a blood sample and record some study specific information. Apart from ECG interpretation, these are activities that the paramedics would not normally do and so the investigators had to provide training in order to ensure that these activities were carried out to the same standard across the four ambulance services that were involved, all of who have different working practices. In order to do this, the investigators provided a training package based around four subject areas - blood sample collection, heart tracing interpretation, background to the study and the importance of conducting the study activities to a high standard (called Research Fundamentals). These were presented to the paramedics either as online training or in a face-to-face session. There has been a mixed response to both the uptake in training across the four ambulance services and the engagement from paramedics in following PRESTO with a potential participant. As more research is being done in the pre-hospital environment the investigators feel that it would be beneficial to try to find out why paramedics may or may not have taken part in the PRESTO training. To do this the investigators will be sending out a survey to each of the four ambulance services which will contain questions around whether the paramedics thought the training package for PRESTO was suitable, whether the paramedics felt confident following PRESTO with a potential participant after the training and what the paramedics think the main barriers are to participating in research. Up to 30 paramedics will also be approached to participate in an interview, which will explore these ideas further. This should allow the investigators to identify potential barriers that prevent paramedics from taking part in training for research studies. It should also allow the investigators to offer insight to future researchers about the type of training that should be provided for paramedics for a research study and how it should be delivered.

NCT ID: NCT04064164 Completed - Dementia Clinical Trials

Speeko for Elderspeak

Start date: December 9, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will test feasibility and preliminary effects of an automated and performance-based feedback app (Speeko for Elderspeak) that detects and reports the use of diminutives (terms of endearment such as honey, dearie, and sweetie), prevalent elderspeak terms linked to BPSD. Building on proof of concept established in the laboratory, the app will demonstrate feasibility at the point-of-care. Next, a clinical trial (N= 6NHs) will be conducted to test preliminary efficacy of the app for amplifying reductions in diminutives use for NH staff completing the CHATO training (3 online modules).

NCT ID: NCT03849937 Completed - Dementia Clinical Trials

Changing Talk Online (CHATO) Study

Start date: September 3, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Objectives AIM 1. Establish acceptability and preliminary efficacy of online CHATO modules through pilot testing with NH staff. AIM 2. Develop and pilot test the data collection tool with consultant and advisory panel input. Interviews of NH administrators and staff who participate in the pilot testing of CHATO and a process evaluation will be used to identify and develop supports for implementation and sustainability in preparation for future CHATO testing. Design and Outcomes The R61 will prepare for the R01 pragmatic trial by establishing feasibility of online modules and preliminary efficacy of CHATO with NH staff. The research design is a randomized clinical trial. One NH will provide initial feasibility testing. Any modifications to the modules will be made. Then six nursing homes (estimated N=150 staff) will be randomly assigned to intervention or wait-list control groups. The primary outcome will be knowledge gain for staff completing CHATO training. Additional outcomes include resident quality measures related to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) on both resident and facility levels and facility level data related to inappropriate use of psychotropic medications to control BPSD. Implementation strategies will be assessed by survey and leadership interviews completed by an external evaluator. Interventions and Duration Changing Talk Online (CHATO) training is a course is to increase awareness of the importance of effective communication with older adults and to use evidence-based person-centered communication during interactions with older adults in nursing homes and other health care settings. The total program is approximately 3 hours, split into 3 modules. Each module is approximately an hour, depending on the individual user. Each NH will work with the research team for three months to plan, implement, and collect data. Sample Size and Population This course is designed for staff in nursing homes, independent and assisted living, and health care settings in the community that include registered nurses, nursing assistants, nursing home dieticians, direct care professionals, other administrations and support employees. All the employees at all seven nursing homes will be asked to participate. Assignment of NHs to intervention and wait-list control groups will be at random. A sample of 150 training participants are estimated.

NCT ID: NCT03684746 Completed - Staff Attitude Clinical Trials

Innovation Adoption in Medical Robotic Surgery: Case of Royal Bournemouth Hospital

Start date: July 11, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This research sets to address two key areas. The first is identified by the researcher in academic literature that there is a lack of a comprehensive innovation adoption model in UK National Health System (NHS), specifically for Medical Robotic Surgery. Existing frameworks are mainly developed in the US or in other fields. The second problem was identified by surgeons involved in Robotic Surgery in Royal Bournemouth Hospital (RBH). The project started by offering RBH a deeper understanding of the innovation adoption process, issues and development of an adapted innovation model, however after our initial meeting with the Surgical Director and his team, it was clear that one the main areas RBH was keen for us to investigate, was the communication pathway of all stakeholders involved in robotic surgery adoption. They were concerned that key staff dealing with patients undergoing medical robotic surgery were uninformed about the technology and process which can impact patients' experience and staff communication. The research will develop a comprehensive innovation adoption model for robotic surgery (and similar medical innovation) in NHS. Currently there are no models adapted to NHS UK structure and requirements. This model will assist the NHS to understand and evaluate any innovation adoption process within the NHS and to avoid future innovation adoption failure. The case example will Identify the communication pathway and key stakeholders in RBH for the process of Gastrointestinal Robotic Surgery, evaluation of stakeholders' knowledge and needs and further proposing ways to improve adoption and increase knowledge. NHS can use the proposed communication pathway to identify stakeholders that need to be informed, trained and communicated to, in any innovation adoption process within NHS.