View clinical trials related to Spasticity, Muscle.
Filter by:In this study assessing whether platelet rich plasma injections(PRP) are effective in the management hemiplegic shoulder pain, 55 patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain was recruited to this randomized controlled study. Patients were randomized into two groups, first getting PRP injections, and other group taking sham injections.
Spasticity - a variety of motor over-activity and part of the upper motor neuron syndrome - is a common cause of impaired motor function after brain injuries of different etiologies. In addition, it may cause pain and impaired hygiene, contractures, deformities etc. Spasticity has been reported in 30 to 90% of patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) and cerebral palsy (CP). Spasticity therapy has emerged as an important approach to alleviate related symptoms. Positive effects on spasticity are well recognized following systemic and intra-thecal pharmacological treatment, as well as after intra-muscularly injected substances; the effect of the latter is, however, of limited duration. While pharmacological spasticity therapy has been applied for decades, surgical procedures remain fairly uncommon in adults with spasticity, but not in pediatric patients with CP, and outcomes after surgical treatment are scarcely described in the literature. The study center is a specialized unit initially focused on reconstructive as well as spasticity reducing surgery in the upper extremities for SCI patients. Subsequently, patients with spasticity also due to various other Central nervous system diseases have been referred to the center for surgical treatment. Studies describing the effect of spasticity-reducing surgery in the upper extremities are rare and the group is heterogeneous. The aim of the study is therefore to evaluate the results and compare against todays golden standard treatment (boutuliniumtoxin injections).
This study is "A Prospective, Multi-center, Single Arm, Open-label, Phase IV Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDITOXIN® in Treatment of Post Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity".
This is an observational study of medical marijuana manufactured and dispensed by Ilera and given as standard treatment for a variety of approved serious medical conditions as defined by individual state law. All patients who are receiving one of the four formulations (Dream, Soothe, Shine and Ease) of medical marijuana will be provided a study flyer and asked to contact the study team via phone or email. Once the study team confirms eligibility, the study team will meet the subject face-to-face most likely at their dispensary (or other mutually agreeable location) and obtain informed consent, and assent when appropriate. Initial baseline demographic information, medical history and medication inventory will be completed. Also, since it is possible that the Investigators will enroll subjects across the region, Investigators anticipate the need to seek consent over the phone for many patients. This will be done via Skype, Go to Meeting, Facetime or similar platforms so that the Investigators can have a face to face interaction with the potential subjects. Regardless of where this discussion takes place (i.e., in person or via the web), all reasonable safeguards to ensure patient privacy will be taken. Patients or their legally authorized representative (LAR) will be given sufficient (i.e., up to several hours/days) to make a decision to participate in this study. Study staff will fax or email the consent form for their signature and no study procedures will begin until the signed consent form is received by the study team. The subjects or their LARs will be instructed on obtaining the blood samples. Blood draws will be completed in the subjects' home after one of their standard doses is taken.
Spinal cord injury is a devastating condition, causing substantial impairment of vital body functions caudal to the lesion. A major cause of disability stems from spasticity, a common secondary sequelae. Its various clinical manifestations include spasms, clonus, and resistance to passive movements, and often present a major hindrance in rehabilitation, further deteriorate residual motor performance, and negatively impact independence and quality of life. Despite its high prevalence, successful management of spasticity has remained difficult. Standard-of-care treatment modalities are often insufficient or bear the risk of undesirable side effects further accentuating paresis. Epidural stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord via implanted electrodes provides for an alternative approach. It works through modifying the dysregulated neural signal processing of spared spinal circuitry caudal to the injury. Its ameliorative effects on severe lower-limb spasticity have been repetitively reported. Yet, epidural spinal cord stimulation in motor disorders is still off-label, applied in relatively few patients only, also because of its invasive character, the time consuming testing phase for its effective application, and the lack of markers to identify responders in advance. With the development of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation, a method became available to activate the same input structures to the lumbar spinal cord as with epidural stimulation and hence to induce similar neuromodulatory effects, yet non-invasively, using standard equipment available at rehabilitation centers. A recent proof-of-concept study has shown that a single 30-minute session of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation controlled various clinical signs of spasticity and augmented residual motor control in spinal cord injured individuals for several hours beyond its application. Further, in one subject, the stimulation was repetitively applied for six weeks, resulting in cumulative therapeutic effects persisting for 10 days after its discontinuation. These observations strongly suggest that the stimulation can induce beneficial neuroplastic adaptations of spared spinal systems and their interaction with residual supraspinal control. The proposed research aims at studying the reproducibility of these findings in a statistically sound cohort of individuals with spinal cord injury and testing the applicability and acceptance of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation as a home-based therapy.
Previous studies showed that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) transiently improves performance of motor function in stroke patients, as well as decrease muscle hypertonia. In severely brain injured patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC), a single stimulation over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex has shown to improve patients' sign of consciousness. Nevertheless, other brain areas could be stimulated in order to manage other symptoms occurring in this population of patients, such as muscle hypertonia. In this study, investigators will assess the effects of bilateral fronto-central tDCS on spasticity as measured with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores in patients with DOC in a double-blind sham-controlled experimental design.
Stroke is a clinical picture that can result in loss of motor, sensory and cognitive functions or coma. Approximately 75% of stroke survivors develop disability and one of the causes of disability is the presence of spasticity. Effective treatment of spasticity accelerates functional recovery. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injection is a safe and effective method in the management of focal spasticity. As its effects over central and peripheral nervous system have been understood, dry needling has been recently introduced as the novel treatment of spasticity after stroke in clinical practice. Studies evaluating the efficacy of dry needling in the treatment of spasticity are limited in the literature and there is no data on the long-term efficacy of dry needling in current studies. On the other hand, the effects of dry needling when combined with other antispastic treatment modalities have not been investigated yet. In this study, the antispastic efficacy of dry needling applied with BTX-A injection was investigated.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) injections for lower extremity spasticity showed a significant reduction of lower extremity spasticity after being injected with Dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) in patients with MS.
Roughly 30% of stroke survivors experience spasticity, a velocity-dependent increase in stretch reflexes. In this pilot study, the investigators aimed to examine the effects of mindfulness meditation on spasticity and quality of life in individuals after stroke.
A single-center, observational, prospective, two dynamic cohorts study with before-after design. Group 1: Treatment with 6 sessions using dry needling with DNHS® (Dry Needling for Hypertonicity and Spasticity) on the spastic muscles of the affected arm in patients with stroke plus standard physiotherapy treatment. Group 2: Standard physiotherapy treatment. Spasticity will be assessed by Modifying Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS), functionality with the Fugl-Meyer scale for the upper limb, motor recovery with Brunnstrom Stages Scale (BSS) and upper limb spasticity pattern (ULP), pain by 10-points Numerical Rating Scale (NRS10) and the quality of life with the Euro QoL 5D 5L survey. In both groups the valuations will be made following the same schedule.