View clinical trials related to Smoking Cessation.
Filter by:Smoking cigarettes remains the number one preventable cause of death and disease in the US. Smokers who call tobacco quitlines and use marijuana struggle to quit tobacco due to the interactive effects of nicotine and marijuana. A recent study found that 25% of callers to state quitlines said they were using marijuana and 44% of those were interested in quitting or cutting back their marijuana use (in addition to wanting to quit smoking). The investigators propose to develop an integrated intervention for co-users of marijuana and tobacco to be delivered via state-funded quitlines. The investigators will incorporate key elements of an evidence-based brief behavioral intervention called 'The Marijuana Check-Up' into the tobacco quitline treatment. The investigators will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of the new intervention in a small randomized pilot study with 100 co-users recruited from four participating state quitlines. Outcomes measured at 3 months post randomization will include tobacco abstinence (biochemically verified) and days used marijuana. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will: (1) be feasible to deliver (measured by coach treatment fidelity scores); (2) be acceptable to co-users (measured by enrollments into the study and call completion numbers); (3) increase tobacco cessation rates compared with standard quitline treatment; (4) increase co-users motivation to change MJ use; and (5) produce greater reduction in days using MJ compared with standard quitline treatment. The proposed brief behavioral intervention addressing co-use may increase quitline callers' chances of achieving and maintaining tobacco abstinence and increase participants' motivation to reduce marijuana use. As non-medicinal marijuana use becomes common and legal in more states, a low touch phone and web-based intervention for co-users of marijuana and tobacco could improve health outcomes for many. Findings will inform development of scalable public health intervention strategies for co-users easily implemented across quitlines.
Double-blind (for the two active arms), randomized, three-arm (two active and one control) clinical trial investigating factors (e.g. nicotine concentration) influencing the success of smoking cessation strategies and possible health risks related to nicotine salt vaping.
The investigators propose to use a parallel group, randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of a 13-week personalized approach to reducing smoking intervention versus a second approach using a different health intervention on smoking cessation, healthy sleep metrics, and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in a sample of 200 treatment-seeking smokers who are adults living with HIV (ALHIV). To enroll in the study, treatment-seeking ALHIV smokers will undergo phone and in-person study eligibility assessments, including a history, physical examination, screening laboratory tests, and an overnight in-home objective sleep assessment. Eligible subjects (N=200) will be randomized to the 13-week Approach 1 (N=100) or Approach 2 (N=100) condition. All subjects will receive a 12-week course of varenicline (beginning in week 2) and 8 individual 15-minute smoking cessation counseling sessions [weeks 1, 2, 3 (target quit date), 5, 7, 9, 11, 13]. At each in-person counseling session, 30-45 minutes of Approach 1 or Approach 2 counseling will be provided as well. While receiving varenicline, the study team will monitor for side effects and changes to blood pressure at each study visit for safety reasons. Study measures are collected at all time points including EOT (week 13), and 6-month follow-up (6MFU).
- Objective: Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the "STOP" (Sevrage Tabagique à l'aide d'Outils dédiés selon la Préférence: Smoking Cessation using preference-based tools) intervention, a preference-based smoking cessation intervention for smokers with low socio-economic position (SEP). - Methods : STOP is a randomised, multi-centre, single blinded, intent-to-treat trial. Participating centres include primary care practices (community, municipal or general health clinics), hospital-based facilities, and healthcare institutions specialised in addiction treatment. Smokers with low SEP will be randomised into either the intervention or control group. Persons randomised to the control group will be accompanied by their health professional according to standard practice. Participants randomised to the intervention group will receive the same smoking cessation advice, drug (varenicline, champix,..) prescription and support as participants in the control group, but they will also have a choice of being given free Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) (transdermal patch, gum, spray, inhaler, sublingual tablets/lozenges) and/or an electronic cigarette + e-liquid on the spot to aid their quit attempt. Follow-up appointments will take place at around 7 to 14 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after inclusion, according to the participant and health professional availability. The main outcome measure of this study will be the 7-day point prevalence tobacco abstinence at 6 months after inclusion (yes/no), defined as self-reported abstinence for at least 7 days, This self-reported abstinence will be validated by measured exhaled carbon monoxide, unless this measurement is unavailable due to the ongoing covid-19 pandemic.
Smoking cessation has been shown to improve the effectiveness and reduce the morbidity of tobacco-related cancer treatments. We will identify effective smoking cessation strategies for patients who are receiving treatment for tobacco-related cancer. In this trial, patients' preferences in smoking cessation therapy will be the principal determinant by providers in developing a three component regimen of pharmaceutical therapy, counseling, and nicotine replacement therapy. This study will identify this cohort's preferences for smoking cessation strategies. We will then examine the impact of utilizing patient preferences upon cessation efficacy by directly comparing cessation success in this study with our recently completed study of the same population using the same tobacco treatments which were randomly assigned.
The objective of the proposed research is to conduct a longitudinal experiment on the neurocognitive pathways and individual differences in high-level construal for affect regulation and smoking cessation. The population is adult smokers aged 25-55 who have tried and failed to quit and who are experiencing poverty. The primary endpoints are (a) the similarity in neural representation of high-level construal to one of two candidate pathways, (b) the presence of meaningful individual differences in the neural representation of high-level construal, and (c) as a secondary endpoint, the effect size of the high-level construal condition on smoking as measured by cigarettes per day. Each of these endpoints corresponds to a specific null hypothesis. The null hypothesis for the first endpoint is that high-level construal is not significantly different in its neural representation from down-regulation of craving, which would suggest that high-level construal does not operate through distinct mechanisms from traditional treatments. The null hypothesis for the second endpoint is that the between-subjects variability in the neural representation of construal level does not significantly relate to relevant individual differences measures (e.g., traits, task behavior), which would suggest that individual differences are not meaningfully related to outcomes. Finally, the null hypothesis for the secondary endpoint is that the magnitude of the effect of high-level construal on smoking as measured by reductions in average cigarettes per day is not significantly greater than in the other conditions, which would suggest that the efficacy of the high-level construal condition is not significantly greater than a standard text-messaging intervention. The primary endpoints will be assessed at baseline and change from pre-to-post training (8 weeks).
This is a smoking cessation treatment study. Patients who have a cancer or a suspected cancer who will undergo surgical removal of their cancer are eligible to participate in this study. A novel smoking cessation treatment will be provided to half of the participants in the study. All study participants will receive standard smoking cessation therapy including counseling and the nicotine patch.
Smoking during pregnancy has harmful effects on both mother and unborn child. Studies have shown that small rewards can help smokers to quit. In our current study, we ask how such rewards are most effective in supporting smoking cessation in pregnancy.
CESTO 2 is a 318 participants, 3-arm, multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase II clinical trial. The main objectives are to select the most efficient dose and to assess long-term efficacy of NFL-101 compared to placebo, for abrupt cessation and for reduction before cessation.
The main purpose of this research study is to compare traditional behavioral smoking cessation therapy with a different type of behavioral therapy-known as behavioral activation problem solving (BAPS)-for smoking cessation. Standard smoking cessation counseling (SC) focuses on self-monitoring, identifying smoking triggers and how to manage them, relaxation and social support for non-smoking, and relapse prevention. BAPS focuses on recognizing he feelings you are having that lead to smoking and how to overcome those feelings and focus on activities that discourage you from smoking and avoid activities that encourage you to smoke. Both counseling types include gathering information about your personal smoking patterns, your likes, dislikes, and other personal characteristics about your lifestyle. Half of participants who enroll in the study will receive standard smoking cessation counseling (SC) and half will receive BAPS counseling. We will compare the rates of quitting smoking across the two groups at the end of treatment (study week 10), and 12 weeks after the end of treatment (study week 26)