View clinical trials related to Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Filter by:This is an open, multicenter phase II clinical study for PLM60. The primary aim of the study is to observe the initial efficacy of PLM60 in treatment of small cell lung cancer. The secondary aim is to explore the safety and PK characteristics of PLM60
To assess the safety and efficacy of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
The main purposes of Phase 1b of this study are to determine the following in participants with advanced solid tumors: - Safety and tolerability of NT-I7 in combination with pembrolizumab - Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and/or the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) The main purpose of Phase 2a of this study is to assess the preliminary anti-tumor activity of NT-I7 in combination with pembrolizumab in participants with checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) treated and naïve relapsed and refractory (R/R) tumors. The main purpose of the Biomarker Cohort is to assess a potential correlation between tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and clinical benefits in participants with CPI-naïve R/R ovarian cancer (OC).
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related ill-health and death in the United Kingdom (UK), but with advances in systemic anti-cancer therapies the prognosis for people in later stages is improving. There is growing evidence that electronic systems which enable patients to monitor and report symptoms can help improve symptom control and patient care. This study aims to investigate optimal ways of introducing an electronic symptom reporting system (eRAPID) in lung cancer care at Leeds Cancer Centre. eRAPID was developed by the University of Leeds and its integration with the electronic health records at Leeds Cancer Centre enables staff to view patient symptom reports directly. eRAPID provides advice to patients about self-management of milder symptoms, for serious symptoms patients are encouraged to contact the hospital and an alert is sent to the nurse or doctor by email. The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility and usefulness of an electronic symptom reporting system (eRAPID) for lung cancer patients and healthcare professionals during the treatment of lung cancer and during one year follow up. Two groups of patients will be recruited on the basis of their access to the internet at home (rather than randomisation). It is anticipated that approximately 100 patients will enrol into one of two groups: - Group 1: Patients with online access at home will be asked to report weekly using their own devices. - Group 2: Patients without online access will be asked to report on a tablet computer before their planned clinic appointments. The eRAPID questionnaire is based on existing eRAPID items with the addition of new items specific to lung cancer. These have been developed by the clinical team and patient groups have been consulted over the suitability of the wording used. Analysis of patient reported symptoms, quality of life and clinical information will be descriptive. Disease-related symptoms and health-related quality of life will be compared across groups of patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer. Treatment-related side effects of patients will be compared across the different types of treatment received. To determine the best means of engaging patients in systematic electronic reporting, the recruitment and compliance rate will be compared between the two patient groups. The utility of patient reported information to healthcare staff will be assessed through staff interviews.
Anlotinib In Combination With Durvalumab As Sequential Therapy of Thoracic Radiotherapy After Induction Chemotherapy For Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer:A Single Arm Study
This is an expanded access program in the USA to enable eligible patients with previously treated small cell lung cancer to access lurbinectedin treatment prior to FDA approval. Sites must apply to participate in the program. A medical doctor must assess whether the potential benefit outweighs the risk of the investigational therapy considering the program eligibility criteria and the individual patient's medical history.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of INCB099318 in select solid tumors.
This study will evaluate the efficacy of tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and carboplatin and etoposide (CE) compared with placebo plus atezolizumab and CE in participants with chemotherapy-naive extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Eligible participants will be stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (0 vs. 1), LDH (</= upper limit of normal [ULN] vs. > ULN), and presence or history of brain metastasis (yes vs. no) and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of the following treatment regimens during induction phase: - Arm A: Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus CE - Arm B: Placebo plus atezolizumab plus CE Following the induction phase, participants will continue maintenance therapy with either atezolizumab plus tiragolumab (Arm A) or atezolizumab plus placebo (Arm B).
The study consists of 2 parts. Part 1 is dose escalation and will first administer SY-5609 alone to participants with select advanced solid tumors and then in combination with fulvestrant to participants with HR positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Part 2 is a dose expansion and will first administer SY-5609 in combination with gemcitabine and then SY-5609 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in participants with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) .
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and early clinical activity of INCB099280 in participants with select solid tumors