View clinical trials related to Prostate Neoplasm.
Filter by:This study evaluates contrast-enhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR perfusion imaging for the visualization of blood vessels and enhancing tissues with better spatial detail and improved temporal fidelity compared to current methods.
Evaluate the protein expression of lactate dehydrogenase enzyme (LDHA) and MCT-1/-4 transporters, involved in lactate synthesis and transport, in prostate carcinoma tissues from severely overweight/obese (BMI > 27.5) and non-severely overweight/normoweight (BMI < 27.5) patients affected by prostate carcinoma. ii. Characterize the immune infiltrate in the prostate carcinoma of the aforementioned patients. iii. Assess the association between intra-tumoral lactate accumulation (using LDHA and MCT-4 protein expression levels as readouts) and alterations in the tumor immune microenvironment and/or deregulation of relevant oncogenic pathways.
In the Netherlands, most men with prostate cancer (PCa) are treated with radical whole-gland treatment, i.e. prostatectomy or radiotherapy. The burden of complications such as incontinence and erectile dysfunction associated with radical treatment is considerable. A recent systematic review by our group has shown that focal therapy of PCa seems to reduce the burden of treatment side-effects in men with intermediate-risk disease, maintaining their quality of life without compromising oncological effectiveness. The costs of side effects that can be prevented are estimated at €5456 per patient, resulting in total expected cost savings of about €22 million per year in The Netherlands. Furthermore, exploration of the benefit-risk balance under patients showed that they are willing to sacrifice some survival for an improvement in quality of life (QoL). Focal therapy comprises a modern alternative to selectively treat a specific part of the prostate while preserving the rest of the gland. There is, however, a lack of high-quality evidence, and numerous papers therefore recommend to perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). The RCT should have long-term follow-up, predefined assessment of cancer-specific and health-related QoL outcome measures, and economic evaluations to inform policymakers regarding cost-effectiveness. This RCT on focal therapy versus usual care is urgently needed to enable focal therapy to overgrow the experimental status, provide the evidence needed for guidelines, and make this available for selected patients who benefit from this strategy. Because of its promising results in other countries, focal therapy is increasingly requested by patients, but due to the lack of high-quality evidence, it is not reimbursed yet. This has been designated by both the PCa patient support group and physicians as a failure of both the market and the funding agencies. The investigators, therefore, aim to perform a high-quality multi-center RCT to provide the evidence needed to decide on reimbursement and implementation of focal therapy in patients with intermediate-risk, unilateral clinically localized PCa in the Netherlands.
The goal of this observational study was to compare the perioperative outcomes, postoperative urinary control rates and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates of the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined anterior and posterior approach (AP-RARP) with the Retzius-sparing approach (RS-RARP) and anterior approach (anterior-RARP) in the treatment of prostate cancer. The main question it aims to answer was: • The early therapeutic efficacy of the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined anterior and posterior approach Participants has been underwent: - AP-RARP - RS-RARP - anterior-RARP Researchers compared the three groups to see if AP-RARP combines the advantages of anterior and posterior RARP and is a feasible surgical option for the treatment of prostate cancer.
Doctors leading this study hope to learn about a software that researchers at the University of Chicago have developed to help analyze radiographic images (different techniques for taking images that allow doctors to visualize the body's internal structures) of the prostate. Participation in this research will last about 12 months. There is a one-time MRI and 1-2 biopsies and then the investigator would like to follow the participant's progress.
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men. documented risk factors of prostate cancer are age, ethnicity, various genomic mutations and family history of prostate cancer. The cellular mechanisms of malignant transformation are numerous and not completely understood. A possible mechanism is induction of an inflammation resulting in cellular atypia and pre-malignant changes in the affected tissue by inducing a pro-inflammatory response or changes in extra cellular matrix. Protein Kinase A (PKA) is a key stone enzyme in various intra-cellular processes. Various infections' inflammations and malignancies were proved to impact PKA activity. The research hypothesis is that prostate cancer tissue will show a unique profile of PKA activity, regulation and intracellular distribution.
The diagnostic tools for detecting patients with early prostate cancer are limited due to poor diagnostic performance. The positron emission tomography (PET) combination with the diagnostic radiopharmacy is a non-invasive tool to provide the molecular imaging of the whole body and offer more comprehensive physiological information and then can raise the diagnostic performance. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting pharmaceuticals have been regarded as the most promising diagnostic tool to diagnose patients with prostate cancer. Currently, the 18F-PSMA-1007 as PSMA-targeting 18F-radiolabeled pharmaceuticals have developed and successfully used in patients with intermittent- and high-risk prostate cancer or recurrent prostate cancer. The study aims to understand the diagnostic performance of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in different-stage prostate cancer patients by initiating the first multicenter clinical trial of 18F-PSMA-1007 in Taiwan.
The AFFIRM trial tests the safety and clinical feasibility of MR-guided hypofractionated focal boost radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. External beam radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy is considered as the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced non-metastatic prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion.The long-term results of the multicentre phase III study (FLAME trial) showed that addition of an isotoxic focal boost to the intraprostatic lesion improves biochemical disease free survival in intermediate to high-risk patients without impacting toxicity and quality of life. This focal boost strategy is now proven for a conventional fractionation scheme (35 fractions). The current trend in radiotherapy for prostate cancer is (extreme) hypofractionation, reducing the number of fractions. For locally advanced prostate cancer, however, the data on extreme hypofractionation are scarce.
Doctors leading this study plan to collect new information about the lowest effective dose of abiraterone acetate in study participants with prostate cancer who are taking abiraterone in combination with prednisone for the first time. The duration of this study will be about 3 months (12 weeks). How long you stay on abiraterone, and at what dose after completion of the 12 weeks of study drug administration, will be up to you and your treating physician.
NUV-868-01 is a first-in human, open- label, Phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion study in patients with advanced solid tumors. The Phase 1 and 1b portions include patients with advanced solid tumors and are designed to determine the safety and the dose(s) of NUV-868 to be used as monotherapy and in combination with olaparib or enzalutamide for the Phase 2 portion. In Phase 2, NUV-868 in combination with olaparib or enzalutamide will be given to determine the safety and efficacy of these study treatments. One cohort of patients (with enzalutamide-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer) will be randomized to receive either NUV-868 monotherapy, enzalutamide monotherapy, or the combination of NUV-868 + enzalutamide. Patients will self-administer NUV-868 orally daily in 28-day cycles as monotherapy in Phases 1 and 2. In Phases 1b and 2, patients will self-administer NUV-868 orally daily in 28-day cycles in combination with olaparib or enzalutamide daily at standard prescribed doses (Phase 1b) or at the recommended Phase 2 combination dose (RP2cD) that is determined in Phase 1b. Patients will be treated until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or termination of the study.