Multi-modality Imaging (PCa) Using Sodium MRI and PSMA PET in Men Pre-prostatectomy

Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial

— IGPC-5  

Official title:

Multi-modality Prostate Cancer Image Guided Interventions - 5

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04053842
• Other study ID #: IGPC-5
• Secondary ID: REB File # 11413
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: February 4, 2021
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2024

Study information

• Verified date: February 2024
• Source: Lawson Health Research Institute
• Contact: Project Coordinator: Catherine Hildebrand, PhD
• Phone: 519-685-8500
• Email: catherine.hildebrand[@]lhsc.on.ca
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study is a non-randomized, prospective trial of men scheduled for radical prostatectomy for treatment of prostate cancer as standard of care and will undergo a series of pre-operative multi-modality imaging studies. Pre-operative imaging will be correlated with actual pathology results and statistical modeling performed to determine the most informative imaging biomarkers in predicting cancer location and aggressiveness (Gleason Score).

Description:

The over-arching goal is to "improve the quality of life for survivors of prostate cancer" through advanced imaging tools for improved pre-treatment detection and characterization of prostate cancer through non-invasive imaging. Seminal research measuring tissue sodium concentration (TSC) in human PCa with sodium MRI has demonstrated increased TSC in prostate lesions related to tumor aggressiveness. This suggests that the addition of sodium MRI to mpMRI data will enhance the identification and characterization of prostate lesions in men with PCa. This will improve the healthcare of men through better risk stratification and treatment decisions, which will ultimately reduce overtreatment. Radio-labeled PET tracers that target PSMA have demonstrated exceptional sensitivity for molecular imaging of prostate lesions. Lesion-detection specificity of combined PSMA PET and mpMRI is very high (97 - 100%). However, PSMA PET is not practical for active surveillance of prostate cancer within the current healthcare system due to limited access and the fact that its added cost and radiation dose restricts its utility for repeated scans. However, as a tool to develop and validate our imaging assay, it is unparalleled. Compared with hybrid PET/MRI, a single modality imaging assay based only on mpMRI contrasts and endogenous TSC would be more widely available, cost effective and find wider clinical adoption - particularly for AS. The immediate expected outcome from this project is that an MRI assay combining data from mpMRI and sodium MRI will have a similar ability as PSMA PET to accurately discriminate between low- and high-risk PCa for improved treatment decisions and surveillance of low-risk disease. The transformative potential of a non-invasive, single modality, whole-gland imaging assay comprised of biomarkers from combined TSC and mpMRI could ultimately replace serial biopsies for surveillance of men with low- and intermediate-risk disease. Patients who are educated to understand the typical slow progression of low-risk PCa, surveillance methods and treatment risks are more likely to consider AS. In a systematic approach developed to improve physician counselling of low-risk PCa patients, the acceptance rate for AS was improved to 94% - a relative reduction of approximately 30% in the risk of unnecessary curative treatment. However, it is also important to note that the rate of subsequent treatment for men undergoing AS may be as high as 50% over 10 years of follow-up. The majority of these men are transitioned to treatment within 2-3 years of initial diagnosis. Identification of those men who fit the criteria for AS but are destined to have early progression is an important clinical goal. Those men can be streamed to early treatment through longitudinal assessment of lesion progression with this imaging assay and thus increase the confidence and uptake of AS protocols. AS of PCa (including possible delayed treatment) saves costs over the lifetime of a patient, compared with immediate treatment and provides superior quality of life. Research Strategy: The investigators will evaluate a non-invasive imaging assay for in vivo characterization of prostate lesions comprised of clinical multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) combined with sodium magnetic resonance imaging (sodium MRI) in a cohort of men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer. The use of mpMRI to detect, localize and stage prostate cancer is becoming standard clinical practice. Prior research in ten patients has established that tissue sodium concentration (TSC) assessed by sodium MRI increases significantly with histological grade in prostate lesions. The addition of TSC data to conventional mpMRI data (i.e. ADC values, T2 contrast, contrast agent wash-in/out rates) will be evaluated in a multivariate data analysis to demonstrate that a combination of these imaging protocols improves the characterization of PCa. The resulting predictive tool (imaging assay) will accurately discriminate between low- and high-risk PCa for improved treatment decisions and to assess possible progression of low-risk disease during surveillance. This imaging assay will be validated against positron emission tomography (PET) using a radio-labeled tracer which binds to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA PET is arguably the most sensitive imaging method for detection of intra-prostatic lesions. Importantly, it has a high sensitivity for prostate lesion detection (>90%), even for lower tumor grades where mpMRI has difficulties. Maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of this radiotracer has been positively correlated with Gleason grade and as such, is an excellent comparator for TSC assessment of lesion aggressiveness. Unfortunately, the limited accessibility and cost of PET hinders its clinical application. In this project, the investigators expect to validate that the addition of sodium MRI to mpMRI can provide similar lesion characterization compared to PSMA PET. Data supporting this hypothesis will be acquired using a hybrid PET/MRI system because this is the best imaging platform for this project. If successful, the incorporation of sodium MRI into existing mpMRI protocols would improve characterization of disease and be a more cost effective and generalizable innovation compared to PET-based techniques that require both an expensive probe as well as hybrid imaging platforms.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 45
• Est. completion date: August 31, 2024
• Est. primary completion date: July 31, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Provision of informed consent for this study
• Male, aged 18 years or older
• Pathologically confirmed prostate cancer on previous biopsy
• Suitable for and consenting to Radical Prostatectomy for treatment as standard of care

Exclusion Criteria:

• Prior therapy for prostate cancer (including hormone therapy)
• Use of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, i.e. finasteride (Proscar) or dutasteride (Avodart) within 6 months of study start. Patients undergoing a 6-month washout period prior to study start will be eligible.
• Inability to comply with the pre-operative imaging panel
• Patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy with prostate size exceeding 65 cc
• Allergy to contrast agents to be used as part of the imaging panel
• Acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 4 or 5 (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73m2) or those on dialysis
• Post-void residual urine volume > 150 cc (determined by post-void ultrasound)
• Hip prosthesis, vascular grafting that is MRI incompatible or sources of artefact within the pelvis
• Contraindication to MRI
• pacemaker or other electronic implants
• known metal in the orbit
• cerebral aneurysm clips

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Prostate Adenocarcinoma
• Prostate Cancer
• Prostate Neoplasm
• Prostatic Neoplasms

Intervention

Diagnostic Test:
• PET Scan
PET imaging uses small amounts of a radioactive substance called a tracer to look for disease in the body. The radioactive substance used in this study is [18F]PSMA-1007.

Drug:
• [18F]PSMA-1007 Injection
[18F]PSMA-1007 is given by intravenous (IV) injection into the arm. It travels through the blood stream where it is rapidly taken up by prostate cancer cells and emits tiny, positively charged particles (called positrons) that produce signals into the body. These signals are detected by the PET component of the PET/MRI scanner.

Diagnostic Test:
• Sodium MRI
Sodium MRI uses magnetic waves and a specially-designed rectal probe to measure the sodium concentration (amount of salt) in the prostate. Previous research has shown that higher sodium concentrations in the prostate might be a sign of more aggressive cancer.
• Multiparametric MRI
MRI is a common medical diagnostic tool that uses magnetic waves and a contrast agent (dye) called Gadovist to take pictures of body tissue.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Canada	London Health Sciences Centre	London	Ontario

Sponsors (4)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Glenn Bauman	Centre for Probe Development and Commercialization, United States Department of Defense, Western University, Canada

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (28)

Alfano R, Soetemans D, Bauman GS, Gibson E, Gaed M, Moussa M, et al. Development of a Computer Aided Diagnosis Model for Prostate Cancer Classification on Multi-Parametric MRI. In: Petrick N, Mori K, editors. Medical Imaging 2018: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. Proceedings of SPIE. 10575. Bellingham: Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering; 2018.

Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ; European Society of Urogenital Radiology. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y. Epub 2012 Feb 10. — View Citation

Barrett T, Riemer F, McLean MA, Kaggie J, Robb F, Tropp JS, Warren A, Bratt O, Shah N, Gnanapragasam VJ, Gilbert FJ, Graves MJ, Gallagher FA. Quantification of Total and Intracellular Sodium Concentration in Primary Prostate Cancer and Adjacent Normal Prostate Tissue With Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Invest Radiol. 2018 Aug;53(8):450-456. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000470. — View Citation

Barrett T, Turkbey B, Choyke PL. PI-RADS version 2: what you need to know. Clin Radiol. 2015 Nov;70(11):1165-76. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.093. Epub 2015 Jul 29. — View Citation

Bauman G, Martin P, Thiessen JD, Taylor R, Moussa M, Gaed M, Rachinsky I, Kassam Z, Chin J, Pautler S, Lee TY, Valliant JF, Ward A. [18F]-DCFPyL Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Localization of Dominant Intraprostatic Foci: First Experience. Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):702-706. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 26. — View Citation

Broeke NC, Peterson J, Lee J, Martin PR, Farag A, Gomez JA, Moussa M, Gaed M, Chin J, Pautler SE, Ward A, Bauman G, Bartha R, Scholl TJ. Characterization of clinical human prostate cancer lesions using 3.0-T sodium MRI registered to Gleason-graded whole-mount histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 May;49(5):1409-1419. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26336. Epub 2018 Nov 14. — View Citation

Chan I, Wells W 3rd, Mulkern RV, Haker S, Zhang J, Zou KH, Maier SE, Tempany CM. Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. Med Phys. 2003 Sep;30(9):2390-8. doi: 10.1118/1.1593633. — View Citation

Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Walz J, Kattan MW, Huland H, Graefen M. A critical appraisal of logistic regression-based nomograms, artificial neural networks, classification and regression-tree models, look-up tables and risk-group stratification models for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2007 Apr;99(4):794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06694.x. — View Citation

Ehdaie B, Assel M, Benfante N, Malhotra D, Vickers A. A Systematic Approach to Discussing Active Surveillance with Patients with Low-risk Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2017 Jun;71(6):866-871. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.026. Epub 2017 Jan 24. — View Citation

Evans JD, Jethwa KR, Ost P, Williams S, Kwon ED, Lowe VJ, Davis BJ. Prostate cancer-specific PET radiotracers: A review on the clinical utility in recurrent disease. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jan-Feb;8(1):28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.07.011. Epub 2017 Jul 20. — View Citation

Ghai S, Haider MA. Multiparametric-MRI in diagnosis of prostate cancer. Indian J Urol. 2015 Jul-Sep;31(3):194-201. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.159606. — View Citation

Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, van Oort IM, Witjes JA, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Scheenen T, Barentsz JO. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):453-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11091409. — View Citation

Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P, Davis M, Peters TJ, Turner EL, Martin RM, Oxley J, Robinson M, Staffurth J, Walsh E, Bollina P, Catto J, Doble A, Doherty A, Gillatt D, Kockelbergh R, Kynaston H, Paul A, Powell P, Prescott S, Rosario DJ, Rowe E, Neal DE; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14. — View Citation

Han W, Johnson C, Gaed M, Gomez JA, Moussa M, Chin JL, et al. Automatic cancer detection and localization on prostatectomy histopathology images. In: Tomaszewski JE, Gurcan MN, editors. Medical Imaging 2018: Digital Pathology. Proceedings of SPIE. 10581. Bellingham: Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering; 2018

Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, Yakar D, Somford DM, Heijmink SW, Scheenen TW, Vos PC, Huisman H, van Oort IM, Witjes JA, Heerschap A, Futterer JJ. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology. 2011 Oct;261(1):46-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11091822. — View Citation

Hricak H, Choyke PL, Eberhardt SC, Leibel SA, Scardino PT. Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. Radiology. 2007 Apr;243(1):28-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2431030580. Erratum In: Radiology. 2007 Oct;245(1):302. — View Citation

Hsieh FY, Bloch DA, Larsen MD. A simple method of sample size calculation for linear and logistic regression. Stat Med. 1998 Jul 30;17(14):1623-34. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980730)17:143.0.co;2-s. — View Citation

Klotz L. Active surveillance: the Canadian experience. Curr Opin Urol. 2012 May;22(3):222-30. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328352598c. — View Citation

Kozlowski P, Chang SD, Meng R, Madler B, Bell R, Jones EC, Goldenberg SL. Combined prostate diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI at 3T--quantitative correlation with biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jun;28(5):621-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Apr 13. — View Citation

Kwee SA, Thibault GP, Stack RS, Coel MN, Furusato B, Sesterhenn IA. Use of step-section histopathology to evaluate 18F-fluorocholine PET sextant localization of prostate cancer. Mol Imaging. 2008 Jan-Feb;7(1):12-20. — View Citation

Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, Partin AW. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.042. — View Citation

Moore CM, Giganti F, Albertsen P, Allen C, Bangma C, Briganti A, Carroll P, Haider M, Kasivisvanathan V, Kirkham A, Klotz L, Ouzzane A, Padhani AR, Panebianco V, Pinto P, Puech P, Rannikko A, Renard-Penna R, Touijer K, Turkbey B, van Poppel H, Valdagni R, Walz J, Schoots I. Reporting Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: The PRECISE Recommendations-A Report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):648-655. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 24. — View Citation

Sanyal C, Aprikian AG, Cury FL, Chevalier S, Dragomir A. Management of localized and advanced prostate cancer in Canada: A lifetime cost and quality-adjusted life-year analysis. Cancer. 2016 Apr 1;122(7):1085-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29892. Epub 2016 Feb 1. — View Citation

Udovicich C, Perera M, Hofman MS, Siva S, Del Rio A, Murphy DG, Lawrentschuk N. 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in advanced prostate cancer: Current state and future trends. Prostate Int. 2017 Dec;5(4):125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 24. — View Citation

Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, Fritz J, von Guggenberg E, Kendler D, Scarpa L, di Santo G, Roig LG, Maffey-Steffan J, Horninger W, Virgolini IJ. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):941-949. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3631-6. Epub 2017 Jan 31. — View Citation

Ward A, Crukley C, McKenzie C, Montreuil J, Gibson E, Gomez JA, et al. Registration of in vivo prostate magnetic resonance images to digital histopathology images. MICCAI'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Prostate cancer imaging: computer-aided diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention; Bejing, China. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010

Ward AD, Crukley C, McKenzie CA, Montreuil J, Gibson E, Romagnoli C, Gomez JA, Moussa M, Chin J, Bauman G, Fenster A. Prostate: registration of digital histopathologic images to in vivo MR images acquired by using endorectal receive coil. Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):856-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12102294. Epub 2012 Apr 2. — View Citation

Wibmer AG, Burger IA, Sala E, Hricak H, Weber WA, Vargas HA. Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Radiographics. 2016 Jan-Feb;36(1):142-59. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150059. Epub 2015 Nov 20. — View Citation

* Note: There are 28 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Pathologic Validation and Modeling	We will evaluate the ability of simultaneous multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), sodium MRI and positron emission tomography (PET) with a radio-labeled probe for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) to accurately predict the actual cancer distribution found in the whole mount prostatectomy specimens obtained from the surgery.; A variety of statistical methods will be utilized to build predictive models based on the extracted features and to identify a final model that will be used as the predictive tool (i.e. the imaging assay).; We will quantify the ability of these models to enhance clinical lesion identification.	4 years