Study of Hypofractionated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title:

Phase I-II Trial of Hypofractionated Conformal Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Favorable-risk Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00831623
• Other study ID #: 58116
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 17, 2009
• Est. completion date: July 18, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: February 2023
• Source: Loma Linda University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine hypofractionated conformal proton beam radiation therapy of prostate cancer can achieve similar treatment benefits as our current institutional standard with conventional fractionation.

Description:

Radiation therapy has a long and established role in the curative treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer. However, the optimal radiation dose and treatment schedule remain unknown. The use of hypofractionation has a long and generally successful history in conformal proton beam therapy. Several reports detailing the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated conformal radiation therapy (with x-rays) of prostate cancer can be found in the literature. Hypofractionated conformal proton beam radiation therapy has become our institutional routine for the treatment of numerous solid tumors. The purpose of this study is to determine if a shortened overall treatment schedule will result in equivalent tumor control rates and no increased side effects as compared to our current institutional standard treatment of an equivalent dose given over a longer period of time.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 167
• Est. completion date: July 18, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: July 18, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Male
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma within 180 days of registration

• History & Physical Exam, including digital rectal exam (DRE), within 8 wks prior to registration

• Histologic evaluation of prostate biopsies at LLUMC, with Gleason score assignment

• Clinical stage, Tumor Stage (T1-T2C)

• Prostatic Specific Antigen (PSA) less than 10 ng.ml within 180 days prior to registration

Exclusion Criteria:

• Prior or concurrent invasive malignancy

• Evidence of distant metastasis

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Prostate Cancer
• Prostatic Neoplasms

Intervention

Radiation:
• Proton Radiation
3 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) /Day to isocenter, one treatment per day, 5 days per week for 20 treatments (=60 CGE to isocenter/20 fractions)
• Proton
As above

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Loma Linda University Medical Center / James M. Slater Proton Treatment Center	Loma Linda	California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Loma Linda University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (13)

Coen JJ, Bae K, Zietman AL, Patel B, Shipley WU, Slater JD, Rossi CJ. Acute and late toxicity after dose escalation to 82 GyE using conformal proton radiation for localized prostate cancer: initial report of American College of Radiology Phase II study 03-12. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):1005-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.047. Epub 2010 Oct 6. — View Citation

Ronson BB, Yonemoto LT, Rossi CJ, Slater JM, Slater JD. Patient tolerance of rectal balloons in conformal radiation treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Apr 1;64(5):1367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.11.001. Epub 2006 Feb 20. — View Citation

Rossi CJ Jr, Slater JD, Yonemoto LT, Jabola BR, Bush DA, Levy RP, Grove R, Slater JM. Influence of patient age on biochemical freedom from disease in patients undergoing conformal proton radiotherapy of organ-confined prostate cancer. Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):729-32. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.043. — View Citation

Slater JD, Rossi CJ Jr, Yonemoto LT, Bush DA, Jabola BR, Levy RP, Grove RI, Preston W, Slater JM. Proton therapy for prostate cancer: the initial Loma Linda University experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):348-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.011. — View Citation

Slater JD, Rossi CJ Jr, Yonemoto LT, Reyes-Molyneux NJ, Bush DA, Antoine JE, Miller DW, Teichman SL, Slater JM. Conformal proton therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Urology. 1999 May;53(5):978-84. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00014-x. — View Citation

Slater JD, Yonemoto LT, Rossi CJ Jr, Reyes-Molyneux NJ, Bush DA, Antoine JE, Loredo LN, Schulte RW, Teichman SL, Slater JM. Conformal proton therapy for prostate carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Sep 1;42(2):299-304. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00225-9. — View Citation

Slater JD. Clinical applications of proton radiation treatment at Loma Linda University: review of a fifteen-year experience. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Apr;5(2):81-9. doi: 10.1177/153303460600500202. — View Citation

Slater JD. Twenty years of proton radiation therapy at Loma Linda University Medical Center. In U. Linz, editor. Ion beam therapy: fundamentals, technology, clinical applications. Berlin: Springer, 2012:581-595.

Slater JM, Bush DA, Grove R, Slater JD. The prognostic value of percentage of positive biopsy cores, percentage of cancer volume, and maximum involvement of biopsy cores in prostate cancer patients receiving proton and photon beam therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jun;13(3):227-31. doi: 10.7785/tcrtexpress.2013.600271. Epub 2013 Sep 20. — View Citation

Slater JM, Slater JD, Kang JI, Namihas IC, Jabola BR, Brown K, Grove R, Watt C, Bush DA. Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Early Prostate Cancer: Results of a Phase I/II Trial at Loma Linda University. Int J Part Ther. 2019 Summer;6(1):1-9. doi: 10.14338 — View Citation

Talcott JA, Rossi C, Shipley WU, Clark JA, Slater JD, Niemierko A, Zietman AL. Patient-reported long-term outcomes after conventional and high-dose combined proton and photon radiation for early prostate cancer. JAMA. 2010 Mar 17;303(11):1046-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.287. Erratum In: JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1257. — View Citation

Zietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, Shipley WU, Efstathiou JA, Coen JJ, Bush DA, Lunt M, Spiegel DY, Skowronski R, Jabola BR, Rossi CJ. Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long-term results from proton radiation oncology group/american college of radiology 95-09. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8475. Epub 2010 Feb 1. — View Citation

Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, Rossi CJ Jr, Miller DW, Adams JA, Shipley WU. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1233. Erratum In: JAMA. 2008 Feb 27;299(8):899-900. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Number of Participants With Late Treatment-Related Toxicity Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3, CTCAE Version 4.0	To determine if late CTCAE version 4.0 Grade 3 treatment-related morbidity, which is no worse than that engendered by our current institutional standard with conventional fractionation, can be maintained in a hypofractionated schedule.	Every 6 months after completing treatment through the duration of the trial with a minimum of 2 years follow-up and an average of 5 years
Secondary	Number of Participants With Acute and Late Gastrointestinal or Genitourinary Grade 2 Morbidity, CTCAE Version 4.0	To determine if late CTCAE version 4.0 Grade 2 treatment-related morbidity, which is no worse than that engendered by our current institutional standard with conventional fractionation, can be maintained in a hypofractionated schedule.	Every 6 months after completing treatment through the duration of the trial, with a minimum of 2 years follow-up and an average of 5 years