View clinical trials related to Pneumothorax.
Filter by:The number of lung biopsies has increased steadily in recent years. Pneumothorax is the most common complication of a lung biopsy and can occur during the procedure, immediately after the procedure or within a few hours (delayed pneumothorax). The incidence of pneumothorax in the literature is very different from one study to another: it has been reported to be from 9 to 54% in patients undergoing percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy. This difference of incidence could be explained by the absence of consensus for the definition of an iatrogenic pneumothorax. The characteristics of pneumothorax and the management of patients with iatrogenic pneumothorax will be evaluated in different centres in a retrospective manner. This study will contribute to refining the criteria for defining pneumothorax occurring during lung biopsy and will provide a better understanding of the condition and its management.
Through this randomized controlled clinical trial, we aim to identify whether there is a difference in the incidence of 24 hour pneumothorax after chest tube removal, in two blindly randomized groups of patients: The first group with chest tube clamping 6 hours prior to removal, and the second group there will be no chest tube clamping. The data will be prospectively collected from patient records from the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases Ismael Cosío Villegas.
Investigators will compare two different approaches of postoperative drainage after the standard water-seal drain has been used efficiently; one is by using urine bag and check it get blown by the leaked air, two is by using clamping of the water seal drain. Investigators will compare them depending on several factors such as; cost effectiveness, hospital stay, duration of putting the drain and more, reinsertion of the chest tube and others.
All calls that end up on the out-of-hours general practitioners' service (OHGPS), which contain a demand for an urgent home visit, are passed on to the on-call general practitioner (GP). These calls are randomized into two arms: after the patient's informed consent, they are assigned either to one arm where the monitoring device, PICO, is applied together with the GP's general care or to the other arm where only the usual care is provided. All data such as suspected diagnosis, treatment or referral, influence of the parameters, ECG and/or alarms on the management and the user-friendliness are recorded. After 30 days, the diagnosis and evolution is requested from the patient's own GP or, if referred to a hospital, in the hospital in order to be able to compare the effect of the approach by the GP between both arms. The aim is to investigate if 1/ the use of the PICO monitoring device could improve GPs' decisions to refer to hospital or not in urgent cases; 2/ there is a difference between the diagnosis with and without the use of the monitoring device using the final diagnosis by the electronic health record of the own GP of the patient; 3/ the call to send a GP for an emergency contained sufficient information for the OHGPS phone operator to take an appropriate decision; 4/ the build-in alarms help the GP during his intervention; 5/ the PICO is easy to use during an emergency; 6/ the use of the device makes them feel more confident in transmitting the information to the Medical Emergency Team.
Over-inflation of the bronchial cuff of the double-lumen tube (DLT) can cause damage to the airway mucosa and misplacement of the tube, and under-inflation may cause incomplete collapse of the non-ventilated lung and incomplete ventilation of the lung that should be ventilated. Appropriate cuff pressure is generally known to be ranged 20-30 cmH₂O, but in the study of Okubo et al., who observed the minimum bronchial cuff volume and pressure that did not cause air leakage using the method of confirming by capnography, it was possible to obtain the result that OLV was possible without air leakage even at a pressure lower than 25 cmH₂O (the generally recommended tube cuff pressure) in both men and women. In a recent study of Yamada et al., when using the capnography waveform-guided method to inflate the bronchial cuff by checking for air leakage using the capnography waveform, the bronchial cuff volume (BCV) that satisfies the air-tight seal was significantly smaller compared with a pressure-guided method to inflate the bronchial cuff with 20 cmH₂O. The minimum bronchial cuff volume (BCVmin) at which such air leakage does not occur may vary from individual to individual. It is presumed that this is because the diameter of the left main bronchus (LMB) differs from individual to individual, which causes the variation of the gap between the diameter of the LMB and the outer diameter of the DLT mounted thereon. Moreover, the previous study revealed that the lateral positioning could increase the pressure of the bronchial cuff mounted on the LMB due to the gravity-induced morphological and conformational change of the trachea. Considering these factors, the researchers hypothesized that the change in the bronchial cuff pressure (BCP) due to a positional change might vary depending on whether the bronchial cuff was inflated, that is, the initially established BCVmin. Therefore, in this study, the researchers tried to investigate the effect of BCVmin on the change of minimum bronchial cuff pressure (BCPmin) due to the positional change from the supine to lateral decubitus, by dividing the groups whose BCVmin is 0 ml or exceeds 0 ml.
Thoracic complications directly or indirectly consequence of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (including either pathologies strictly related to the infection, or iatrogenic effects of therapeutic attempts to treat it) have been described during the pandemic. Many of the above conditions often require a surgical approach but, based on published data reporting high early postoperative morbidity and mortality, many experts initially advised against any referral to surgery in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the issue is if salvage surgical approach should be always excluded or could be considered when it represents the only remaining effective option. In the absence of solid data and recommendations, this is a demanding challenge for thoracic surgeons. The investigators have coordinated a multicenter study to collect the experience of several worldwide high-volume thoracic surgery departments. Their objective is to investigate efficacy and safety of surgery in COVID-19 patients who developed thoracic complications that required operative management.
The study will be conducted as a, prospective, open label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. In the intervention group; chest tube removal will be determined by air flow criteria as indicated by the digital drainage system data. In the control group removal will be determined by the same criteria of the digital drainage system but before removal, a chest tube clamping test will be performed. Primary outcome measure: recurrent pneumothorax after chest tube removal requiring chest tube reinsertion
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of single dose analgesia in combination with local anesthesia to control pain during Trans Ultrasound guided procedures. It also aims to assess the effect of its use on procedure performance time and rate of complications occurrence compared to local anesthesia alone.
Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is usually performed with general anesthesia and single lung ventilation. However, performing thoracic surgery under awake regional anesthesia has several potential advantages including avoidance of airway trauma and ventilator dependence associated with endotracheal intubation, besides promoting enhanced recovery after surgery and shorter mean hospital stay.
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) has become a standard of care in adults, pediatric surgeons have been slower to undertake this approach. There are limitations for working in children. The site of a chest tube becomes the working site for thoracoscopic surgery and the only scar. We propose this study to do a retrospective review comparing the conventional multiport thoracic surgery with the newer single port site.