View clinical trials related to Pneumothorax.
Filter by:This study has been added as a sub study to the Simulation Training for Emergency Department Imaging 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05427838). The Lunit INSIGHT CXR is a validation study that aims to assess the utility of an Artificial Intelligence-based (AI) chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation tool in assisting the diagnostic accuracy, speed, and confidence of a varied group of healthcare professionals. The study will be conducted using 500 retrospectively collected inpatient and emergency department CXRs from two United Kingdom (UK) hospital trusts. Two fellowship trained thoracic radiologists will independently review all studies to establish the ground truth reference standard. The Lunit INSIGHT CXR tool will be used to analyze each CXR, and its performance will be measured against the expert readers. The study will evaluate the utility of the algorithm in improving reader accuracy and confidence as measured by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The study will measure the performance of the algorithm against ten abnormal findings, including pulmonary nodules/mass, consolidation, pneumothorax, atelectasis, calcification, cardiomegaly, fibrosis, mediastinal widening, pleural effusion, and pneumoperitoneum. The study will involve readers from various clinical professional groups with and without the assistance of Lunit INSIGHT CXR. The study will provide evidence on the impact of AI algorithms in assisting healthcare professionals such as emergency medicine and general medicine physicians who regularly review images in their daily practice.
Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is usually performed with general anesthesia and single lung ventilation. However, performing thoracic surgery under awake regional anesthesia has several potential advantages including avoidance of airway trauma and ventilator dependence associated with endotracheal intubation, besides promoting enhanced recovery after surgery and shorter mean hospital stay.
Primary spontaneous pneumothoraces (PSP) represent a significant public health problem, occurring in young healthy subjects without pre-existing lung disease or precedent medical intervention or trauma with a reported incidence of up to 18-28/100 000 per year. PSP treatment often requires thoracic surgery to restore lung expansion and to prevent de novo lung collapse. Despite the presence of elaborated guidelines by the British Thoracic Society (BTS) postulating apical wedge resection of the lung and total parietal pleurectomy (WRPP), the majority of German hospitals gathered experience especially in limiting surgery to cost-saving partial apical parietal pleurectomy or yet apical pleural abrasion (PP). Until today, hardly any reliable data exist to analyze and compare the varying treatment approaches regarding efficacy and efficiency. In this randomized, multi-centric clinical trial, both treatment approaches will be compared. For this purpose, candidates for surgery will be randomized into one of the two treatment groups after informed consent has been obtained. Patients will be followed for 2 years by the participating centres to be able to evaluate the long-term effect of the surgical interventions.