View clinical trials related to Pneumothorax.
Filter by:Thoracic complications directly or indirectly consequence of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) (including either pathologies strictly related to the infection, or iatrogenic effects of therapeutic attempts to treat it) have been described during the pandemic. Many of the above conditions often require a surgical approach but, based on published data reporting high early postoperative morbidity and mortality, many experts initially advised against any referral to surgery in COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the issue is if salvage surgical approach should be always excluded or could be considered when it represents the only remaining effective option. In the absence of solid data and recommendations, this is a demanding challenge for thoracic surgeons. The investigators have coordinated a multicenter study to collect the experience of several worldwide high-volume thoracic surgery departments. Their objective is to investigate efficacy and safety of surgery in COVID-19 patients who developed thoracic complications that required operative management.
The study will be conducted as a, prospective, open label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. In the intervention group; chest tube removal will be determined by air flow criteria as indicated by the digital drainage system data. In the control group removal will be determined by the same criteria of the digital drainage system but before removal, a chest tube clamping test will be performed. Primary outcome measure: recurrent pneumothorax after chest tube removal requiring chest tube reinsertion
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) has become a standard of care in adults, pediatric surgeons have been slower to undertake this approach. There are limitations for working in children. The site of a chest tube becomes the working site for thoracoscopic surgery and the only scar. We propose this study to do a retrospective review comparing the conventional multiport thoracic surgery with the newer single port site.
Spontaneous pneumomediastinum (PMS) is defined as free air within the mediastinum. Spontaneous pneumothorax (PNX) consists of the presence of air inside the pleural space. PMS and PNX may sometimes occur secondly to an underlying pathology, or deriving from a sudden increase in intra-alveolar pressure such as functional alteration such as airway hyperactivity, Valsalva maneuver, cough, barotrauma, and/or volutrauma with consequent rupture of the alveoli and subsequent leakage of air into the mediastinum due to the Macklin effect. The escaping air can then spread inside the pericardium, the peritoneum, the muscles, and subcutaneous tissues, hence causing subcutaneous emphysema. PMS and PNX are rare complications of several lung infections such as Pneumocystis Jirovecii pneumonia, tuberculosis, bacterial necrotizing pneumonia, and herpes pneumonia. However, an increasing number of PMS and PNX has been described in patients with SARS-CoV2 interstitial pneumonia. PMS and PNX can either present as the onset manifestation of COVID-19 disease, or occur as complications of non-invasive and/or invasive ventilation, or following to cystic and/or fibrotic evolution of the pathology. The frequency of PMS and PNX during COVID-19 is not well defined, as the available data are limited to case collections and single reports. According to currently available scientific literature, PNX in COVID-19 occurs with frequency rates of 1-3%, up to 6% in patients undergoing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and mechanical artificial ventilation (VAM). In McGuinness's analysis, which compared the complications of barotrauma in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in VAM, PNX and PMS occurred with frequency rates of 9% and 10%, respectively, while in non-COVID-19 population, PNX and PMS frequency rates were 12% and 3%, respectively.
To validate the benefits of recognizing asymmetric lung disease like atelectasis and pneumothorax in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome using electrical impedance tomography
This prospective randomized multicenter study is intended to investigate tolerance and effectiveness of thoracic drainage conducted by Seldinger technique with small drains, or by a surgical-like technique with large armed drains, in intensive care units patients.
Out-of-hospital care during Chemical-Biological-Radiological-Nuclear-explosive (CBRNe) events have recently evolved, but the available knowledge is still extremely partial. In particular, the debate is still ongoing regarding which life-saving maneuvers should be implemented in the pre-decontamination phase while wearing CBRNe personal protective equipment (PPE). The investigators hypothesized that PPE may lengthen the execution times and worsen the success rate of invasive and non-invasive procedures. This trial involves residents in emergency medicine and anesthesia/critical care of the University of Padova (Italy) with the following procedures performed on high-fidelity manikins, after being divided into two groups (wearing and not wearing PPE): positioning of peripheral venous access; intraosseous access; drug preparation and administration; tension pneumothorax (PNX) needle decompression; tourniquet positioning; chest compressions. The primary outcome was the chest compressions depth mean difference between the two groups. As secondary outcomes, the investigators measured differences between the two groups in: the percentages of correct release during chest compressions; chest compressions rate (beats per minute); and the times needed to complete the above-mentioned procedures (other than chest compressions). The investigators expect that PPE will reduce CPR quality or delay the completion of the procedures.
Pneumothorax is a common life-threatening complication, frequently seen in patients who have been admitted to the emergency department and intensive care unit. This study aimed to describe the features of patients with pneumothorax due to blunt or penetrating trauma. A total of 615 patients admitted to the emergency department between January 2008 and December 2010 due to multi-trauma, and underwent both chest x-ray and computed chest tomography were included in the study. There were 157 patients with a diagnosis of pneumothorax. Fifty-five of them were excluded because of the eligible criteria. The final study population included 105 patients. The computed chest tomography reading was considered as the gold standard for the occult pneumothorax diagnosis. Data on patient characteristics, trauma types, accompanied traumas, etiology of the chest trauma, and chest x-ray, and computed chest tomography results were recorded.
The study will assess the safety and feasibility of a new medical device, MIPP-Kit, for the prevention of complications during diagnostic, CT guided ,percutaneous lung needle biopsy.
The objective of this study is to investigate whether the use of strain ultrasound can improve the lung ultrasound accuracy for the diagnosis of pneumothorax, particularly for inexperienced physicians.