View clinical trials related to Periodontitis.
Filter by:This study will evaluate the synergistic effect of CHX + H2O2 when used as an irrigant during biomechanical preparation.in root canal treatment on periapical healing and compared with Chlorhexidine( CHX) and Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl).
application of 1% curcumin gel in clinical study design will be used . The study will be conducted in Al-Najaf specialised dentistry center. The group of patients will be consist of 25 patients, belonging to both sex, age between 30-45 years. All patients will be diagnosed as chronic periodontitis with periodontal pockets of depth 5-7mm bilaterally to be randomly selected.
The adipose stem cells exosomes will be extracted from adipose stem cells isolated autogenously from the patient to be injected locally into the periodontal pockets in order to evaluate their regenerative effect.
The aim is to investigate the influence of oral lichen planus on periodontal status of systemically healthy individuals.
A new classification of periodontal diseases was created in 2018. the investigators want to know if this clinical classification is based, or not, on a biological reality. To do this, the investigators will collect data from the clinical examination (clinical assessment and radiological assessment) as well as non-invasive samples of subgingival plaque and crevicular gingival fluid (CGF). The subgingival plaque samples will be analyzed to define the microbiotic profiles of the patients and the CGF determined to define their inflammatory expression profiles. These results will then be linked to the diagnosis of severity of periodontitis.
Chlorhexidine is the gold standard of dental plaque prevention. Recent research have demonstrated that 0.2% Chlorhexidine solutions are more effective than 0.12% and 0.06% Chlorhexidine solutions. Several 0.2% solutions are available on the market. This study aimed to compare effectiveness of two commercially available 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwashes. Patients, that after initial periodontal therapy, had a need for two periodontal surgeries, will be invited to join. After one surgical session, the patient will receive one 0.2% chlorhexidine solution, and after the next surgical session the patient will receive the other 0.2% chlorhexidine solution. Plaque and gingivitis will be recorded, as well as side effects.
Primary purpose: Evaluate the effect of azithromycin on failure proportion of severe chronic periodontitis non-surgical treatment; failure characterized by the persistence of at least one periodontal pocket> 5mm at 6 months Secondary purpose: - Evaluate the effect of azithromycin on the persistence of pathological periodontal pockets > 5mm during non-surgical treatment of severe chronic periodontitis at 3 months and 6 months - Evaluate the effect of azithromycin on the changes of clinical signs, periopathogen levels, expression of macrolides resistance genes, and expression of antimicrobial peptides (PAMs) during treatment of severe chronic periodontitis at 3 months and 6 months - Assess therapeutic observance and side effects of antibiotic treatment - Assess at 3 and 6 months the potential interactions of local, bacterial (periopathogen and resistance gene) clinical factors, and host defense (PAMs) with the effect of azithromycin, on failure proportion of severe chronic periodontitis non-surgical treatment
Periodontal disease is an infection that causes inflammation and destruction of the tooth supporting structures, and if untreated, will eventually lead to tooth loss. Periodontal disease has been identified as a significant contributor to the global burden of oral disease. This disease is reported to be the sixth most prevalent disease globally. Periodontal disease has an association with diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and preterm low birth weight babies. Therefore, treatment of this disease is necessary. Treatment of periodontal disease involves mechanical removal of oral biofilm. Biofilm removal is initially carried out via non-surgical periodontal therapy, with subgingival debridement being one of the most important steps. According to the first European Workshop on Periodontology, subgingival debridement comprises subgingival instrumentation to disrupt and remove the oral biofilm. Subgingival debridement involves various techniques including hand instrumentation and ultrasonic instrumentation. Recently, treatment modality such as air polishing is also gaining momentum. Air polishing was reported to be more comfortable than conventional periodontal therapy. Besides, a number of studies had portrayed similar clinical outcomes with the use of air polishing in comparison to conventional periodontal therapy. However, there is no study evaluating the health economic aspect of these treatment modalities. Health economic evaluation is a valuable evaluation in intervention studies. Such evaluations provide information on the best way of using available resources in health care settings. For instance, advances in health care technology have resulted in an array of alternative treatment options. Unfortunately, such options tend to cost more than the existing therapeutic approaches. Therefore, economic evaluations will identify the worth of the new treatment options in comparison to the gold standard, in this case, comparing the adjunctive use of air polishing with conventional periodontal therapy. Besides focusing at patient reported outcomes and cost effectiveness of air polishing, this prospective, parallel, single-blinded, randomised controlled clinical trial is also planned to investigate the clinical and biological responses after the adjunct use of Erythritol Powder Air Polishing (EPAP) in addition to root surface debridement (RSD).
Periodontal disease is a chronic multifactorial inflammatory disease that affects the soft and hard supporting tissues of the teeth. It is one of the most common oral health problems which 90% of the global adult population has been reported to have some form of the disease. Microorganisms in dental biofilm play a critical etiological factor in the development of this progressive destruction disease, and if left untreated, will eventually lead to tooth loss. Recurrent periodontal disease did occur in treated and well-maintained patients at different time intervals and is a site-specific disorder. Therefore, subgingival biofilm removal during supportive periodontal therapy has become a fundamental part in achieving a stable oral health after completion of active treatment. Subgingival debridement involves various techniques. In recent years, many studies have reported on the effectiveness of air polishing device using different powders versus conventional hand instruments and/or oscillating scalers. However, there is no study evaluating the health economic aspect of these treatment modalities. As development leads to advancement of treatment options, they often involve higher cost than the existing measures. Therefore, besides clinical efficacy, economic evaluation enables health decision makers to allocate limited health resources in a more efficient manner, to ensure best possible outcomes, without neglecting any segment of care.
The aim: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation for intra-osseous defects in stage III periodontitis using NIPSA versus M-MIST Steps in short Pre-surgical therapy • Before surgical intervention, each patient will be given careful instructions on proper oral hygiene measures. Surgical Procedures: - Group B (Control): Patients will receive Modified Minimally Invasive Surgical technique (M-MIST) Group A (Test): Patients will receive Non-Incised Papilla Surgical Approach (NIPSA) Postoperative medication - Administration of amoxicillin (500 mg tabs) T.I.D for 7 days and Metronidazole (500 mg tabs) T.I.D for 7 days - Rinsing with Chlorhexidine 0.12% (B.I.D for 14 days). - Ibuprofen 600 mg tabs once every 8h could be administrated in case of unbearable pain - Follow up period: after 8 weeks/ after surgery by 1 week- 1 month- 3 months- 6 months- 1 year