View clinical trials related to Pericarditis.
Filter by:The investigators hypothesise that high dose RIF (RIF35) will increase pericardial fluid RIF exposure and so enhance mycobacterial clearance, compared to standard of care dosing (RIF10). This Phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIF 35mg/kg compared 10mg/kg, added to standard first-line ATT, for the treatment of PCTB.
The treatment of acute pericarditis is empiric and is based on treatment with medications with anti-inflammatory properties such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and corticosteroids. However, this therapy is given as a relatively long course of therapy (≥ 3 weeks) and can be associated with substantial side effects. Dexamethasone is a potent corticosteroid that has not been investigated an alternative to conventional therapy in patients with acute pericarditis. Dexamethasone is an inexpensive drug and can be given in an oral tablet form. It has a quick onset of action, relatively long duration of action and is therefore often given in high doses for short periods. Dexamethasone has been shown to be a safe therapeutic option in ITP (Immune Thrombocytopenia), another disease in which steroids are an accepted treatment option. The abundant data on using dexamethasone in comparison to longer prednisone-based regimens has been evaluated in this disease and has shown to be effective and without the longer exposure time to steroids and potential side effects. This data shows that dexamethasone can be a safe therapeutic option. The investigators hypothesize that therapy with short term, high dose dexamethasone will offer better clinical responses to NSAID therapy in the treatment of acute pericarditis with less potential side effects compared to NSAID therapy. The Investigators aim to conduct a randomised, non-blinded trial assessing the use of dexamethasone as an alternative to NSAID for use in patients with acute pericarditis.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might induce high grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) involving the cardio-vascular system. This study investigates reports of cardio-vascular toxicity associated with treatment including anti-PD1, Anti-PDL-1, and Anti CTLA4 classes using the World Health Organization (WHO) database VigiBase, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris Entrepot de Données de Santé (APHP.EDS), French Système National Des Données de Santé (SNDS) Databases and a retrospective international multicenter registry of ICI-associated myocarditis
The purpose of this study is to assess the preliminary efficacy and safety of KPL-914 treatment in participants with recurrent pericarditis.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of rilonacept treatment in participants with recurrent pericarditis.
The pericardium is a double-walled sac containing the heart and the roots of the great vessels. The pericardial sac has two layers, a serous visceral l layer (also known as epicardium when it comes into contact with the myocardium) and a fibrous parietal layer. It encloses the pericardial cavity, which contains pericardial fluid. The pericardium fixes the heart to the mediastinum, gives protection against infection and provides lubrication for the heart. Pericardial diseases may be either isolated disease or part of a systemic disease Diseases of the pericardium present clinically in one of several ways - Acute and recurrent pericarditis - Pericardial effusion without major hemodynamic compromise - Cardiac tamponade with cardiac compromise - Constrictive pericarditis
FEVRIER study is an observatory of hospitalizations in cardiology units in sub-Saharan Africa.
The goal of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of anakinra for the treatment of acute pericarditis when initiated within 6 hours of diagnosis and continued for 3 or 7 days. 1. to determine the efficacy of anakinra with respect to chest pain resolution 2. to determine the safety of anakinra with respect to adverse drug events
Pericardial syndrome includes pericardites acute pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, recurrent pericarditis squeezing chronic pericarditis. The etiologies are very numerous and can be classified as infectious, neoplastic, metabolic or systemic, toxic causes. Diagnosis is difficult, and 80% of etiologies remain classified idiopathic. In their laboratory to improve the diagnosis of this syndrome investigators have developed a strategy of systematic prescription of biological tests by kit. This prescription by 'kit' strategy proved its interest by comparison with an intuitive requirement of biological. In this study investigators want to improve the diagnostic causative of pericarditis by implementing a new diagnostic strategy. This new strategy includes (i) samples additional less invasive for the patient, the swab pharyngeal and nasal, (ii) the addition of at the outset of more effective diagnostic techniques: specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
The study will aim at investigating novel plasma or imaging biomarkers in patients with acute pericarditis. All participants will be treated according to established clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of acute pericarditis. Study participants will undergo blood sampling for measurements of plasma biomarkers potentially involved in the pathogenesis of acute pericarditis. Imaging datasets from available imaging tests will be used to quantify imaging biomarkers. Patients will be followed up prospectively for up to 18 months. The prognostic value of plasma and/or imaging biomarkers for development of complications such as atrial fibrillation, pericarditis recurrences, constrictive pericarditis and/or the need to switch to 2nd line treatment will be sought.