View clinical trials related to Peri-implantitis.
Filter by:DESCRIPTION: The Investigational Product "A-Ce toughened TZP nanocomposite implant" is a Medical Device (MD) intended for the dental rehabilitation of edentulous sites with fixed prosthesis. The "G3®-coated NK2® abutment" is a MD intended for the prevention of peri-implant bone loss due to peri-implantitis. The MD are for dental use and will be used exclusively on subjects who have signed an informed consent form and by approved study investigators. OBJECTIVES: (a) To evaluate the safety and performance of the "A-Ce toughened TZP nanocomposite Implant" for its intended medical application purpose in the context of successful osseointegration of zirconia-based dental implants. (b) To evaluate the safety and performance of the "G3®-coated NK2® abutment" for its intended purpose in the context of peri-implantitis prevention. (c) To obtain the regulatory CE Mark Certification status for both medical devices. TYPE OF INVESTIGATION: Randomized double-blind (patient, appraiser) controlled study. CENTER/COUNTRY: Instituto de Cirugía Oral Avanzada (ICOA), Madrid, Spain GROUPS: Group A: 30 zirconia implants with 30 G3-coated abutments (test implant and abutment) Group B: 30 test implants with 30 uncoated (control) abutments Group C: 30 Ti implants (control) with 30 test abutments Group D: 30 control implants with 30 control abutments Group E: 3 test implants and 3 control implants, for histological/histomorphometric evaluation. COMPARATIVE DEVICE: Commercial Ti dental implant. STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY: H0 : INPERIO performs worse (with statistical significance) than the commercial devices. - Test implants achieve a higher failure rate than Ti implants. - The clinical osseointegration parameter values are worse with statistical significance for test implants than for control implants. - Histological and histomorphometric analysis shows worse quality and quantity of osseointegration for test implants than for Ti implants. H1: There is no statistical significance between INPERIO and the commercial solution or INPERIO performs better (with statistical significance) than the commercial Ti implants. - Test implants achieve the same failure rate or less than Ti implants. - The clinical osseointegration parameter values are no different or are better with statistical significance for test implants than for control implants. - The histological and histomorphometric analysis shows a similar or better quality and quantity of osseointegration for test implants than for Ti implants.
Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease that leads to loss of jawbone around dental implants. Recent discoveries have identified increased release of Titanium (Ti) particles around implants as being associated to peri-implantitis. In this ancillary study to the Dental Hygiene and Peri-Implant Tissues Homeostasis trial the objective is to determine potential triggers of increased Ti dissolution from the implant surface and the mechanisms by which Ti dissolution products amplify peri-implant inflammation. Results from this study will determine whether there is a differential response to Ti particles across individuals, which may alter susceptibility to peri-implantitis.
To study the morphology of the peri-implant defects using cone-beam computed tomography based on a priori case definition of peri-implantitis (≥3mm of radiographic bone loss + inflammatory clinical parameters) Diagnosis of peri‐implantitis requires: - Presence of bleeding and/or suppuration on gentle probing. - Increased probing depth compared to previous examinations. - Presence of bone loss beyond crestal bone level changes resulting from initial bone remodeling. In the absence of previous examination data diagnosis of peri‐implantitis can be based on the combination of: - Presence of bleeding and/or suppuration on gentle probing. - Probing depths of ≥6 mm. - Bone levels ≥3 mm apical of the most coronal portion of the intraosseous part of the implant.
The objective of this non-interventional long-term follow-up observation is to evaluate the long-term sustainability of two surgical treatments of peri-implantitis with and without Geistlich Bio-Oss® and Geistlich Bio-Gide® from a previous study
Angiogenesis is inherently associated to bone formation and healing. During implant osseointegration, a successive and successful angiogenic processes has to occur to promote bone formation. In 1969, Branemark et al. demonstrated that direct contact between bone and titanium implant surface was possible, defining osseointegration as "the direct, structural, and functional contact between live bone and the surface of a functionally loaded implant". Consequently, the need of an empirical measurement appeared. With the introduction of resonance frequency analysis (RFA), it is now possible to measure the degree of implant stability at any time during the course of implant treatment and loading. In this way, changes in implant stability can be monitored over the time and it is likely possible to find implants at risk of failure before they become loose. The rationale of this study is to analyse how important a good vascularization is for the future bone formation around dental implants.
Objectives: To assess the levels of TNF-α, PGE2, RANKL, RANK, OPG, which are immunological markers of peri-implant disease and F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, T. forsythia, P. intermedia, S. oralis, which are microbiological agents of peri-implantitis, in areas where SLA, fluorine-modified and anodized implant surfaces are used. Material and methods: In this study, 71 implants of 37 patients were assessed. The patients were grouped according to the surface characteristics of the implants. Group 1: SLA surface, Group 2: Fluorine modifying surface, Group 3:Anodization surface Plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), pocket depths (PD), clinical attachment levels (CAL) and keratinized tissue width (KTW) were measured. Peri-implant sulcus fluid and subgingival plaque samples were collected. Results: PI was found to be significantly lowest in Group 1, higher in Group 3. Group 3 implants were found to have more bleeding on probing significantly. It was found to be higher peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis in Group 3. GI, PD, CAL, KTW were not found to differ between groups. No significant differences were found between TNF-α, PGE2, RANKL, RANK, OPG. While F. nucleatum, T. forsythia, T. denticola and P. intermedia were found to be significant highest in Group 3, P. gingivalis and S. oralis were found to be high in Group 2. Conclusion: Peri-implantitis rate, BOP and PI were found to be higher in Group 3. F. nucleatum, T. forsythia, T. denticola, and P. intermedia were found to be significantly high in Group 3 implants. This situation can be associated with the porous structure of anodized surface.
Randomized, surgeon and outcome assessor blinded, multi-centric, superiority trial with two parallel groups and a 1:1 allocation ratio with the aim of comparing the surgical treatment of severe peri-implantitis with or without an initial non surgical approach.
The use of systemic antibiotics as and adjunct to non-surgical peri-implant therapy may be an improvement in comparison to these therapies alone. The primary objective is the evaluation of significant changes in probing pocket depth between non-surgical with or without antibiotics. This is a controlled-placebo clinical trial design. Patients with osseointegrated oral implants will be selected and recruited from a university clinic. Oral hygiene instruction and non-surgical debridement at implants will be provided with ultrasonic devices and immediately after, patients will be prescribed: Group Control: A placebo with the same characteristics as the antibiotic Group Test: Systemic antibiotics (Metronidazole 250mg, 2 capsules three times a day, for 7 days Three and six months after non-surgical treatment, clinical parameters will be registered and radiographs compared using reproducible landmarks. Any adverse event will be also recorded.
A case-control study was performed was performed following the STROBE statement from 1996 to 2016 including patients who were diagnosed with early apical peri-implantitis. Data were collected at the time of implant placement, and once the patients developed signs and symptoms consistent with early apical peri-implantitis, to determine the frequency and etiology of this pathology.
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate a new mechanical method (Ti-Brush, Straumann, AG, Basel, Switzerland) of implant surface decontamination. Material and methods: A randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial with a 1-year follow-up it is being carried out. After a hygienic phase, defects were randomly assigned to a control (n=18) or to a test group (n=18). In control group, implant surface was decontaminated both mechanically and chemically with 3% H2O2 and plastic ultrasonic scalers, respectively, while in test group Ti-Brush was added. Infrabony defects in both groups were regenerated with BoneCeramic (Straumann, AG, Basel Switzerland) and collagen barrier membrane Cytoplast (Osteogenics, Lubbock, United States). Clinical and radiographic parameters were measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months after surgery.