View clinical trials related to Peri-implantitis.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to assess which prophylaxis methods is the most suitable for peri-implant hygiene between erythritol and ultrasonic scaler with peek inserts. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted on the patient. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups: - Erythritol group: erythritol with a particle size of ~14 µm will be used for 5 seconds (AIRFLOW® PLUS EMS) - Ultrasonic scaler group: a piezoelectric handpiece with peek inserts (Mini Piezon EMS; PI EMS) will be used. Different subgroups will be defined according to the material of the dental crown of the related implant. The oral hygiene session will be carried out every 6 months (2-years follow-up; 6 sessions), after instruction and motivation of the patient, completion of the clinical chart with the recording of the Probing Depth (evaluation in mm of the peri-implant sulcus taken by a periodontal probe; 4 surfaces of the gingival margin are detected: vestibular, palatal/lingual, mesial, distal), Bleeding on Probing and Plaque Index.
The purpose of this study is to study the use of a new type of d-PTFE membrane called reinforced PTFE Mesh (RPM) with dental surgery. The regenerative outcomes of RPM membranes and collagen membrane for surgical reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis (gum disease around implants) will be compared.
The present study is a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Patients responding to the inclusion criteria will be included. The following peri-implant indexes will be collected: Bleeding On Probing, Gingival Bleeding Index, Marginal Mucosal Conditions (swelling and erythema), Suppuration, Mucosal margin migration, PPD Probing Pocket Depth, Plaque Index, Bleeding Score, radiographic bone loss. After the peri-implant evaluation, patients will undergo supragingival and subgingival professional oral hygiene of both arches performed with ultrasonic instrumentation with PEEK inserts, manual instrumentation with teflon curettes and air polishing with glycine powder. After that, the sample will be randomly divided into 2 groups based on thein-office assigned treatment: - Chlosite® gel application in the peri-implant sulcus - Hybenix® gel application for 30 s followed by rinsing of the peri-implant sulcus. The study will last 9 months. Patients will be visited at: T0, after 1 month from T0 (T1), after 3 months (T2), after 6 months (T3) and after 9 months (T4). In each time frame, indexes collection and nonsurgical debridement will be performed.
This controlled clinical trial will assess clinically, immunologically, and microbiologically the healing of experimental peri-implant mucositis (PIM) lesions in implants treated previously with implantoplasty (IP) compared to those treated without IP.
The primary goal of the present prospective cohort study is to evaluate the effect of varying incidences of BOP at implant sites across 15 months of maintenance visits on the probability of peri-implant disease progression. Over 15 months, participants will attend 6 visits where clinical measurements and maintenance care will be performed every 3 months.
The objective of the present randomized clinical trial will be to compare two surgical methods of treating peri-implantitis. This study will determine if surgical debridement of peri-implantitis bone defects, including air decontamination of implant surfaces, in combination with the placement of a bone graft, differs in treatment outcomes compared to placing the same bone graft material with a resorbable collagen membrane placed over the bone graft.
The use of titanium dental implants has become a common modern treatment to restore teeth. Although the success rate of dental implants is high, inflammation around the dental implant still occurs. The current study will investigate if the inflammation around the implant is due to bacterial infection, hypersensitivity or both. The goal of this cross-sectional study is to (1) Establish the levels of cytokines in peri-implant crevicular fluid associated with bacterial infection and hypersensitivity reaction; (2) Compare the levels of cytokines associated with hypersensitivity and bacterial infection between healthy implants and inflamed implants (peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis); (3) Determine whether the difference in the levels of cytokines, if they exist, reflects the clinical diagnosis of healthy implants and inflamed implants.
Given the novelty of this risk assessment tool, this study will be interested in evaluating its effectiveness through a retrospective approach. The IDRA risk will be analyzed at the time of loading the implant (s) in patients who have already placed an implant (s) during the last five years at the Department of Periodontology and Oral Surgery using the information collected from the periodontal file previously completed. Therefore, patients whose IDRA has been calculated will be called for a clinical and radiological examination to verify the development or not of peri-implantitis or the loss of the implant. In this way, this tool for predicting peri-implant disease will be evaluated to see if it is really effective.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the potential benefit of the adjunctive use of an air-polishing device in the treatment of peri-implantitis as compared to mechanical infection control alone. Following establishment of adequate patient-performed infection control, 80 patients diagnosed with moderate/severe peri-implantitis at ≥1 implant will be randomized to one of two groups. Non-surgical and, if required, surgical therapy will be carried out by experienced operators in three clinical centers and the mechanical instrumentation (control group) will be supplemented by the use of air-polishing with erythritol powder (AirFlow Master, EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) in the test group. The primary outcome assessed is "pocket closure" (ie probing pocket depth ≤5 mm & absence of profuse bleeding on probing) after non-surgical (6 months) and surgical therapy (18 months). Secondary outcomes include changes of clinical signs of soft tissue inflammation, adverse events and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes of non-surgical therapy will be evaluated at 3 and 6 months. Sites with remaining pathology at 6 months will be subjected to surgical therapy.
The purpose of this experimental study in humans is to evaluate and compare, the regenerative therapy for the treatment of peri-implantitis using different bone substitutes and absorbable membranes with surgical therapy without the use of materials for regeneration.