View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Filter by:This is a randomized clinical trial to compare outcomes between the Restorelle® Y mesh and Vertessa® lite Y mesh for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Hypothesis: Vertessa® lite Y mesh is not inferior to Restorelle® Y mesh for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse
The aim of the study will be to compare the SCP and LLS in the management of apical prolapse at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 2 years with the null hypothesis being that no significant differences existed between the two surgical procedures.
This study will assess advanced biomarkers in patients with and without vaginal prolapse. Assessments will be directed at vaginal fibroblasts and adipose derived stem cells.
The study is a prospective study at a single institution. Investigators create strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, selecting 126 patients who undergo the pelvic reconstructive surgery. 63 patients in the intervention group accept 10 times of the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
To study the incidence and distribution of complications after different pelvic reconstruction surgeries (mesh/native tissue) in multi-centers. The investigators aimed to report and summarize the postoperative complications diagnosed in the prior 1 year, 3 years and 5 years respectively, according to the International Urogynecological AssociationInternational Continence Society(IUGA-ICS) Complication Classification Coding(Category-Time-Site coding system) .
Background/Purpose: A novel transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) had been reported. However, factors affecting the efficacy of this novel TVM surgery are unknown; and the above information should be important for preoperative consultation, especially for POP women with concomitant urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate the factors responsible for anti-incontinence effect of this novel anterior TVM surgery. Patients and Methods: All women with POP and concomitant overt or occult USI, who underwent the novel anterior TVM surgeries, were enrolled in this study. Medical records, including urodynamic studies, questionnaires and 3-day bladder diaries, were retrospectively reviewed. Linear regress analysis was used to identify factors that were responsible for the changes in pad weights from baseline [i.e., 100 * (postoperative pad weight - baseline pad weight)/baseline pad weight]. Expected Results: The investigators will get the factors responsible for anti-incontinence effect of this novel anterior TVM surgery. Key Words: pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, pad test, urodynamic stress incontinence
Facing the stakes of hospital beds, this study assessed day case variant technic of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without robotic assistant.
The first objective to determinate the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction in pregnant women and in the first year postpartum. The second objective is to assess the anatomical (both clinical and ultrasound), demographic and obstetric variables in symptomatic women and their association with pelvic floor dysfunction, sexual function and Body Image. This is a single center prospective cohort study. Women will be asked to fill out a questionnaire at the time of their 1st and 3rd trimester scan, at the postpartum checkup and 12 months postpartum. Furthermore, they will undergo a pelvic floor ultrasound at the time of their first and third trimester scan. The presence of pelvic floor dysfunctions will be recorded through validated self-administered questionnaires with five domains: Wexner questionnaire for anal incontinence, PAC-SYM for constipation, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form for urinary incontinence, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory for pelvic organ prolapse, POP/UI Sexual Questionnaire - IUGA revised for sexual function. The body image perception will be assessed using the Dutch-validated version of the self-administered Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire. The anatomy of the pelvic floor will be objectively assessed off line on 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound volumes and POP-Q examination. The demographic variables and information about the pregnancy and the delivery will be obtained from the medical records.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate whether preoperative opioid education will reduce postoperative opioid consumption after urogynecologic surgeries. Additionally, the effect of the opioid education on opioid storage and disposal patterns will be evaluated. The pattern of opioid consumption 2 and 6 weeks after surgery will be compared between patients in the study arms. The rates of prescription refills 12 weeks and 12 months after the surgery will be compared between patients in the study arms.
Surgical treatment of genital prolapse can be performed by laparoscopic surgery or by vaginal surgery, with or without using meshes. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, which consist in fixing a mesh between vaginal anterior wall and the promontory is the gold standard procedure to treat anterior prolapse or of the vaginal vault. Most of studies shows a success rate of 80% of this procedure. However, access to the promontory could be difficult in patients because of adherences or anatomical reasons. This step of the procedure also exposes to risk of ureteral or vascular injuries. Recent issues have also found spondylodiscitis cases. The technique of laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh was developed by Dubuisson in 1998 allows not to have to approach the promontory and avoids both the risk of vascular injury and ureteral damage of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Instead of attach the mesh to the promontory, the procedure consists in spreading out bilaterally, a subperitoneal T-shaped mesh in the anterior abdominal wall. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and functional efficiency of the lateral suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. It is a prospective, randomized, monocentric study compared two groups The study hypothesis is that the lateral suspension would provide correction than the laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The primary outcome is the comparison of anatomic correction rates at 1 year Success is defined as 1 year Ba et C points < -1 centimeter in POP-Q international score. Secondary endpoints are improve of quality of life evaluated with the validated P-QOL questionnaire, and complications rates, including post-operative posterior prolapse. Number of subjects required is 72 patients, 36 in each group having a laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy or lateral suspension. Outcomes will be evaluated at 1 month and 1 year post-operative consultation