View clinical trials related to Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Filter by:This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded, multi-center clinical trial. Symptomatic patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage II, III or IV arranged to undergo pessary treatment will be randomized into either the experimental group or the control group. All patients will receive conventional verbal/paper instruction and counseling from a specialized doctor or nurse before pessary fitting, and the experimental group will receive additional patient education in the form of a re-watchable video. The video mainly includes a short introduction of pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, tips and tricks for wearing and self-management of pessary, possible adverse reactions and remedy. All patients will receive regular pessary fitting and be followed up for 1 year. Self-assessment questionnaires will be used to assess the patients' willingness to pessary treatment, anxiety status, treatment satisfaction and efficacy, and to assess the patients' self-management, complications and treatment adherence. Then the differences between the two groups will be compared.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated to reduce blood loss in trauma, orthopedic, cardiac, and plastic surgeries in numerous well-designed and adequately powered studies. As a result of this evidence for benefit, TXA is routinely used to reduce blood loss during these surgeries. There are no studies regarding the use of TXA in urogynecology. The investigators seek to explore the effect and safety of local infiltration of TXA in vaginal reconstructive surgery.
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse is one of the most common benign gynecological disorders in middle-aged and elderly women, and it has a significant negative impact on women's social, physical, and psychological health. Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is one of the main surgical procedures for reconstructing pelvic floor defects. In previous studies, the ischial spine fascia fixation (ISFF) technique developed by our team has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to SSLF. However, both procedures have inadequate support for the anterior vaginal wall. Therefore, based on the traditional ISFF, we fix the anterior vaginal wall to the ipsilateral ischial spine fascia to enhance support for the anterior vaginal wall. This modified procedure is called modified ISFF. This trial aims to compare the subjective and objective therapeutic effects, recurrence rates, quality of life, perioperative parameters, and complications of modified ISFF and SSLF in the treatment of patients with pelvic organ prolapse of degrees II-IV. Methods: This trial is a randomized controlled multicenter non-inferiority trial. The primary outcome measure is the composite surgical success rate at one-year follow-up, defined as the absence of subjective vaginal bulge symptoms, no need for retreatment, and absence of POP-Q points at or beyond the hymen or vaginal introitus, i.e., Aa, Ba, C, Ap, Bp all < 0 cm. The secondary outcomes include anatomical outcomes of each vaginal segment based on the POP-Q score, subjective improvement in quality of life evaluated by questionnaires (PFIQ-7, PFDI-20, PISQ-12, and PGI-I), perioperative parameters (operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, pain VAS score, hospital costs), and complications. Data analysis will be conducted according to the intention-to-treat principle. Based on a composite success rate of 88% and a non-inferiority margin of -10% (one-sided α = 0.025, β = 0.2), 370 patients will be recruited from 9 centers, including a 10% dropout rate. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether modified ISFF is non-inferior to SSLF in terms of clinical efficacy and complications. Discussion: This multicenter non-inferiority trial will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of modified ISFF compared to SSLF in symptomatic patients with degrees II-IV uterovaginal prolapse. If modified ISFF is proven to be non-inferior to SSLF, it would be a preferable alternative for patients with a shorter vaginal length and those who have difficulties with SSLF due to anatomical factors.
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is one of the common benign gynecological disorders in middle-aged and elderly women, which severely affects patients' quality of life and increases the social burden. The lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for POP is 12.6%. Surgery is an important treatment modality for POP, and currently, there are various surgical procedures used in clinical practice, but there is still no clear consensus on which procedure is superior. Autologous tissue repair remains crucial in pelvic floor reconstruction surgery, and high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUSLS) via a vaginal approach is a classic corrective procedure for central pelvic defects. However, with the development of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) has been widely used in the field of pelvic floor reconstruction. Compared to the vaginal approach, LUSLS is easier to perform, has a shorter learning curve, provides better exposure of the ureters, and allows for higher-quality suture placement under safe conditions. The main controversial clinical issue in the industry regarding high uterosacral ligament suspension is whether to perform uterine preservation, with the core concern being the risk of postoperative recurrence. High uterosacral ligament suspension with uterine preservation achieves level I repair by fixing the lower segment or cervix to supporting structures. Its advantages include shorter operation time, less blood loss, and the preservation of the patient's fertility. Many women request uterine preservation for various reasons. Therefore, high-quality research is needed to guide the clinical decision-making regarding uterine preservation in high uterosacral ligament suspension. Previous studies have found that approximately 40% of patients with pelvic organ prolapse have concurrent cervical elongation. For patients with cervical elongation, symptoms in the central pelvic region are mainly caused by the protrusion of elongated cervical tissue into the vagina. Removing the elongated cervix significantly reduces the need for biological support in pelvic floor reconstruction, making autologous tissue repair strategies the preferred option for this patient population while providing a foundation for uterine preservation. Based on long-term observational studies, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Peking Union Medical College Hospital has proposed combining laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension with cervical amputation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse with cervical elongation. This study aims to compare whether uterine preservation in laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension is non-inferior to uterine removal, providing more treatment options for future patients with pelvic organ prolapse and cervical elongation.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of local estriol treatment applied before vaginal repair surgery on steroid receptors, inflammatory cell response, vascular, connective and nervous tissues in the vagina, and its effects on early postoperative period pelvic floor functions, satisfaction with the surgery and vaginal health.
The aim of this study is to propose an intelligent diagnosis and treatment system for for pelvic floor dysfunction in elderly women. The main question it aims to answer: 1) How can the investigators find out early if older women have different pelvic floor muscle functions? 2）How can the investigators give personalized treatment plans based on differences in pelvic floor function? Participants will be assigned different training programs by the system. The investigators will compare the treatment effects and costs of older women with pelvic floor dysfunction using and not using the system. All the participants will be offered examinations for pelvic floor function and different treatments. All examinations and treatments are non-invasive.
In the effort to reduce postoperative opioid use, there has been increasing interest in developing multimodal pain regimens to better manage postoperative pain while minimizing opioid use and their subsequent side effects that can be detrimental to the healing process. Standard of care approaches to better manage postoperative pain include the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol and the use of peripheral and truncal nerve blocks. Truncal nerve blocks are widely used as an additional modality to provide longer lasting postoperative analgesia and have been adopted as part of the standard of care. The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of ERAS alone versus the quadratus lumborum (QL) nerve block on the postoperative pain experience for women with pelvic organ prolapse undergoing robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy. Subjects will be randomized to the ERAS protocol or the QL block. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1) does the QL block decrease patient reported pain scores postoperatively; and 2) does the QL block decrease the amount of opioid pain medications in the immediate postoperative period? The primary outcome measure will be median patient reported pain score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) following surgery.
The study aims to determine if defecation posture, when using a defecation posture modification device (DPMD), will improve ease of bowel movements in patients with pelvic organ prolapse, specifically rectoceles.
Patients aged 45 to 80 years with a clinical diagnosis of stage III and IV genital prolapse involving the anterior and/or middle compartments and candidates for surgery will be considered. These will be evaluated to observe whether there is improvement in clinical prolapse with the use of the vaginal pessary during the waiting period for surgery
Randomized prospective monocentric interventional study to compare learning curves for traditional vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy performed by bipolar coagulation comparing short-term outcomes for both procedures.