View clinical trials related to Pediatric Obesity.
Filter by:This is a single-center, randomized, SHAM-controlled, parallel assignment, double-masked, interventional trial among children aged 8-17 years (not yet 18 years old) of age with obesity (n=30), recruited from the Duke Healthy Lifestyles Clinic to test the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle rehabilitation (IMR) as an acceptable add-on intervention to reduce dyspnea (feeling short-of-breath or breathless) and to promote greater activity in children with obesity
Our feasibility study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of Family Navigation (FN) to address attrition (dropout) in pediatric obesity management. Results from this study will help our team to plan a large randomized clinical trial to test the effectiveness of FN in reducing attrition. The investigators will enroll 108 6-to-17-year-olds enrolled in pediatric obesity management clinics in Calgary, AB and Mississauga, ON (Canada). One-half of the children will receive Family Navigation (FN) + Usual Care (UC) for 12 months; the other half will receive Usual Care only for 12 months. Overall, the study will take 2.5 years to complete. For children receiving FN, trained navigators will work with children and their families to reduce barriers that limit their access to health services and support. Navigators will offer extra services and resources, such as parking passes for clinic appointments and supportive text messages between appointments. FN is designed to complement the obesity management (Usual Care) received by children and their families. A Steering Committee with children, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers will be created to refine and improve our FN intervention throughout the study. By having better access to care, children and their families working with navigators may be less likely to drop out and more likely to attend more treatment appointments. Ultimately, the participants may be more likely to achieve success in managing obesity.
Metformin use for diabetes has the benefit of causing weight loss in some. The investigators in a preclinical trial, demonstrated that mice consuming non-nutritive sweetened (NNS) drinks had worse glucose improvements and weight loss than mice consuming sugar drinks or water. This study will conduct a pilot to determine if this translates into pediatric clinical practice. The hypothesis is that NNS drinks impair metformin-induced satiation, weight loss, and glucose tolerance.
The aim of this study is to look at changes in diabetes-related risk factors in Black adolescent girls who are at risk for type 2 diabetes after participating in a 12-wk telehealth lifestyle program.
The purpose of this study is to Conduct a proof of concept study to assess feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of an Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) -supported healthy lifestyle behavioral intervention among adolescent patients, their families, and their clinical team.
Obese individuals need to be evaluated comprehensively before exercise programs are determined. Determination of exercise intolerance is important for the detection of functional limitations. One minute sit to stand test (1MSTST) can be used as an alternative to cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) or field tests. It is easy to use, quick to apply, valid and reliable, and applicable even in small areas. In addition, it is a simple assessment adequate for children's needs and behaviors and can be easily applied both in the clinic and at home, making it easier to use in children. Studies have shown that 1MSTST is a valid test in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, and, healthy children and adolescents. However, no study has been found regarding the validity of its use in obese children and adolescents.The aim of our study is to investigate the validity and reliability of 1MSTST in overweight-obese children and adolescents.
In adolescents, conventional obesity treatment comprehensively addresses nutritional, activity, and behavioral topics. Due to limited resources in historically marginalized communities, implementation of nutrition-based interventions that require easy access to fresh food and ability to change the home environment is difficult, which may exacerbate health disparities. It is critical to find nutrition strategies and recommendations that are impactful, sustainable, and cost effective across all communities. There is growing interest in time-based interventions focusing on "when" food is consumed rather than on prescribed macronutrient composition. Time-restricted eating (TRE) is a type of meal-timing which involves fasting for at least 14-hours per day and eating over a 10-hour eating window initiated in the morning, mid-day, or afternoon. TRE recommendations are simple in merely dictating when eating occurs and thus may represent a more straightforward approach for adolescents than other caloric restriction regimens relying on numeracy (kilocalories and macronutrients) and goal setting. In adults, early-day TRE has been shown to reduce body weight, fasting glucose, and insulin resistance. By contrast, restricting food intake to the evening has produced mostly null results or even worsened post prandial glucose levels and β-cell responsiveness. To date, there has been no trial comparing early vs. late TRE on glycemic profiles in adolescents, and it is unclear how meal-timing impacts glycemic profiles in youth. The optimal timing of food intake for adolescents may be very different than adults due to increasing sex steroids and growth hormone levels overnight which may contribute to increased insulin resistance in the early morning. The proposed proof-of-concept study addresses this question by measuring metabolic response to a test meal consumed in the morning, afternoon, and evening among 30 adolescents with obesity using a within participant design. These findings will provide the needed research base for the refinement of TRE interventions in adolescence.
Is to assess cardiac functions of overweight and obese children attending assiut University children hospital in one year duration .
The objective of this study is to implement and test the efficacy of the "Summer Harvest Adventure," a comprehensive garden-based behavioral, social, and environmental intervention for children (ages 8-11 years) residing in low-resource communities.
This study will examine the feasibility and acceptability of a family-oriented augmentation of the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention (DPP), called the Family DPP. It will also preliminarily examine adult and child health and health behavior outcomes. The DPP is a 12-month, group-based lifestyle intervention for adults at high-risk for type 2 diabetes, in which adult participants learn skills and strategies to achieve the program's goals of 5% weight loss and 150 minutes/week of moderate-vigorous physical activity. The Family DPP will consist of all elements of the evidence-based DPP, along with augmentations including additional child-focused sessions in which adult participants will learn about principles and strategies for promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors in children, ages 5 through 12 years. Children may participate in certain child-focused sessions, too. The non-randomized pilot feasibility study will consists of 2 arms/groups: 1) the concurrent "control" group, consisting of adults who are enrolled in the DPP; and 2) the "intervention" arm, in which the adult participants will engage in the Family DPP (and children may participate in certain aspects of the Family DPP focused on children). The study will recruit 10-15 adult-child dyads, for the "intervention" groups, and 10-15 adults for the concurrent control group. In addition to data collected from adult participants as a routine part of the DPP, the study will examine additional adult health behaviors and health outcomes and child health outcomes (change in body mass index z-score) and health behaviors at baseline, 6 months and 12 months (program end) among participants in the "intervention" group.