View clinical trials related to Patient Satisfaction.
Filter by:The purpose of this research study is to evaluate participants' experience and satisfaction during the awake deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedure. Normally, the neurologist will ask the participant questions and also ask the participant to perform tasks during surgery. During this time, the neurologist will be talking to the participant and the participant will be responding by answering questions or participating with the tasks. For some study participants, there will be one small change made to the typical way the neurologist conducts this evaluation. The study staff will then ask the study participants about their experience with the neurologist's evaluation. The subject will not be told what part of the evaluation is changed for the study, until after they have responded to the questionnaire.
Rehabilitation of the edentulous patients has always been a challenge. The success of this treatment modality is not only affected by the patients' acceptance of his new dentures, but on his ability to use them which depends to a great extent on the quality of those dentures. It is strongly believed that the success of dental treatments is affected by the experience of a dentist. The aim of this study was to compare patient satisfaction with complete dentures provided by forth and fifth year dental students and prosthodontists at the University of Jordan Hospital one week and 8 weeks post insertion
Evaluation of patients' satisfaction with conventional one-piece obturators versus two pieces magnet -retained obturators in completely edentulous patient maxillectomy cases.
Sexual dysfunction after rectal surgery varies widely in the literature. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction before surgery and desire of patient to treat this condition is also not well established. Objectives of this prospective cohort study were to determine prevalence of sexual dysfunction with a questionnaire before and after surgery. Patient's satisfaction and quality of life were also collected regarding preoperative information given.
This project aims to evaluate the effect of thank you cards on patient experience survey response rate.
The proposed trial is a prospective, randomized (1:1) trial plan examining whether more routine and frequent measurement of Patient Related Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the care of patients with MS improves patient depression and anxiety outcomes in addition to patient care satisfaction. The investigators plan to randomize people with MS (PwMS) to an intensive arm of filling out patient reported outcome measures every 6 months, with communication to their neurologist about their scores, versus a control arm, where participants fill out patient reported outcomes less frequently (annually) and their scores are not released to their MS Clinic/Neurologist. The primary outcome is to see if more frequent PROM completion leads to less depression and anxiety for people with MS. The investigators also plan to measure their satisfaction of care with their MS Clinic/neurologist and satisfaction in a shared decision-making process. Whether this improves care in patients with MS is currently unknown, and the investigators want to explore this with the current study. The investigators plan to randomize people with MS (PwMS) to an intensive arm of filling out patient reported outcome measures every 6 months, with communication to their neurologist about their scores, versus a control arm, where participants fill out patient reported outcomes less frequently (annually) and their scores are not released to their MS Clinic/Neurologist. The primary outcome is to see if more frequent PROM completion leads to less anxiety for people with MS. The investigators also plan to measure their satisfaction of care with their MS Clinic/neurologist and satisfaction in a shared decision-making process.
To understand how patients perceive the quality of care they receive when given different post-operative analgesic medications. Specifically the investigators want to assess whether patients who receive non-opioid analgesia following surgery endorse appropriate quality and satisfaction with their care compared to those who receive opioid medication.
The main objective of this study is to carry out a medico-economic evaluation of a new platform for outpatient surgical care, by comparing the effectiveness and utility of the deployment of this trajectory on patients and the health system to a control group.
This research study is comparing telemedicine and face-to-face visits to understand patients' experiences with telemedicine versus face to face visits and to understand when it is and is not appropriate to conduct visits remotely
Research question For patients in a need for anterior crown, does the use of Milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin offer better patient satisfaction, marginal adaptation and biocompatibility when compared Milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual layering? Statement of the problem PEEK exhibits a unique modulus of elasticity close to human bone/dentine so it acts as a shock absorber with stress reducing effect. Moreover from a biologic point of view, PEEK is highly compatible with surrounding tissues and it has very promising surface properties . The use of peek in anterior area is limited due to its opaque nature and grayish color, this drawback has been overcome by the use of composite layering material . PEEK restorations can be veneered with manual or CAD/CAM techniques. Information is lacking regarding the influence of the veneering technique on the patient satisfaction , precision of fit and biocompatibility of these restorations which will in turn influence their performance in patient's satisfaction. Rationale To achieve high esthetics when using PEEK it must be veneered by esthetic material 3 . It is available to be used manually or to be milled by CAD/CAM. The manual veneering of the PEEK coping with composite might affect the marginal integrity and the surrounding gingival tissues leading to decrease in the patient satisfaction, while the CAD/CAM veneering technique is proposed to have better patient satisfaction , marginal adaptation and an excellent biocompatible effect on the surrounding tissue. The importance of this trial lies in providing an alternative solution to the manual veneering technique, which will, in-turn, provide better restoration longevity results Aim of the study: The aim of this study is to evaluate the patient satisfaction ,marginal adaptation and biocompatibility of milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin and compare them to milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual layering. Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the patient satisfaction, marginal adaptation and biocompatibility between milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with CAD/CAM composite resin and milled BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with manual layering. Primary objective: - The Primary outcome: : patient satisfaction of the two groups will be assessed by rating score 0 unaccepted , 1 good , 2 excellent - Secondary outcome: Marginal adaptation of the two groups will be assessed using the modified Ryge criteria. - Tertiary outcome: Biocompatibility (Bleeding). Signs of inflammation and bleeding of the two groups will be recorded after clinical examination and probing using periodontal probe Trial design: - Randomized clinical trial Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria: All subjects are required to be: 1-From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2- Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations 3- Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures 4- Patients in a need for anterior crown. 5- Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation Exclusion criteria 1. Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years 2. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases 3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients 4. Pregnant women 5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth 6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations