View clinical trials related to Pain.
Filter by:The study is designed to compare three articulation options in terms of osteolysis, patient satisfaction, clinical and radiographic outcomes (Oxford Hip score (OHS) and Harris Hip score (HHS) and safety. In addition, the purpose of the study is also to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of patients who received G7 Acetabular system in conjunction with Echo BiMetric stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.
The primary objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of standard local anesthetic bupivicaine and liposomal bupivicaine in postoperative pain control both in magnitude and duration in patients undergoing sternotomy, thoracotomy, thoracoabdominal, and laparotomy incisions.
The main objective of the study is to determine if intrarticular injection with liposomal bupivicaine (Exparel) provides better postoperative pain relief and functional outcome following total knee replacement (TKR) than the current standard New England Baptist Hospital regimen of femoral nerve block combined with intraarticular injection of a standard bupivicaine solution.
Burn pain is known to be one the most severe forms of acute pain often requiring large amounts of narcotics in addition to other adjuvants. Topical lidocaine is effective for controlling pain in various settings including dressing changes of burns. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of topical lidocaine in decreasing pain scores and narcotic requirements when applied to donor graft sites while at the same time not interfering with the standard of care TheraBond dressing. During this study the investiagtors will be monitoring for evidence of delayed wound healing, and surgical site infection.
This randomized pilot clinical trial studies pregabalin in preventing acute pain syndrome in patients receiving paclitaxel. Pregabalin may control the pain caused by cancer treatment.
Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience that is one of the main symptoms of temporomandibular disorder (TMD). One way to assess pain is through algometry. The aim of this study was to evaluate, by the pressure pain threshold measurements, the efficacy of a short-term conservative treatment for the management of temporomandibular disorders. This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial where 84 participants were diagnosed with myofascial pain according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), with a mean age of 44 years old ranging from 18 to 76 years old. These individuals were asked about parafunctional habits and the treatment was applied by providing an explanation concerning the role of pain, possible aetiological factors of the patient's TMD, the relationship between chronic pain and psychosocial distress, and its benign character. They also had to perform once daily application of hot packs on both sides of the face for 20 minutes and after that they must perform active free therapeutic exercise of mouth opening for 10 times. The pressure pain threshold of the masseter and temporalis muscles and the lateral pole of the condyle were obtained at baseline (T0), between 15 and 30 days after (T1) and at 75 to 90 days after (T2) representing the end of the treatment. Two groups of subjects were obtained. The first was considered the study group (SG) and included those who underwent the treatment proposed. The control group (CG) consisted of participants who did not undergo treatment because they did not believe in it.
The degree of protection afforded by colonoscopy against proximal colorectal cancer (CRC) appears to be related to the quality of the procedure, and the incomplete removal of lesions has been shown to increase the subsequent risk of developing a colon cancer. Some studies suggest that small polyps with advanced histology are more common in the right than in the left colon (right colon proximal to splenic flexure, left colon distal to the splenic flexure). The average size of polyps in the right colon with advanced pathology or containing adenocarcinoma was ≤9 mm, whereas in the left colon their average size was >9 mm, P<0.001. Inadequate prevention of right-sided CRC incidence and mortality may be due to right-sided polyps with advanced histology or that harbor malignancy. These presumptive precursors of cancer are smaller and possibly more easily obscured by residual feces, and more likely to be missed at colonoscopy. Water-aided colonoscopy (WAC) can be subdivided broadly into two major categories: water immersion (WI), characterized by suction removal of the infused water predominantly during the withdrawal phase of colonoscopy, and water exchange (WE), characterized by suction removal of infused water predominantly during the insertion phase of colonoscopy. In some reports WE appeared to be superior to both WI and air insufflation colonoscopy (AI) in terms of pain reduction and adenoma detection, particularly for <10 mm adenomas in the proximal colon. In this multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) we test the hypothesis that that WE, compared to AI and WI, will enhance overall Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in CRC screening patients. Confirmation of the primary hypothesis will provide evidence that WE enhances the quality of screening colonoscopy. We also hypothesize that WE may be more effective in detecting proximal colon adenomas than WI and AI, particularly <10 mm adenomas, thus increasing proximal colon ADR and proximal colon ADR <10 mm. Confirmation of secondary hypotheses will provide justification for further testing that WE may provide a strategy to improve prevention of colorectal cancer by increasing detection of adenomas in screening colonoscopy. Unlike previous reports of single colonoscopist studies, the insertion and withdrawal phases of colonoscopy will be done by different investigators. The second investigator will be blinded to the method used to insert the instrument, thus eliminating possible bias about procedure related issues. Several secondary outcomes will also be analysed.
Chronic pain is a significant public health problem that affects over 116 million Americans, costs $600 billion annually, and is unequally borne by people in low-income brackets, especially ethnic minorities. Many individuals also have health literacy deficits (difficulty understanding their illness and difficulty navigating the health care system for treatment) putting them at a greater disadvantage. Treatment usually relies on expensive medical interventions that often have negative side-effects. Psychosocial treatments, like Pain Education and Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT), show promise, but are usually unavailable. Clinicians are poorly equipped to provide psychosocial treatments to patients with low health literacy. CBT has not been adapted and supported for use in individuals with low health literacy, and even educational materials are often poorly adapted for their needs. To address this problem, the PI completed a small trial showing benefits from health literacy-adapted pain education and CBT groups for chronic pain in a population with low income and low health literacy. Patients in both treatments reported lower pain by the end of treatment, and the effects were maintained at one year. Patients in the CBT group also reported less depression. The current study uses a larger sample, and directly compares these psychosocial treatments to medical treatment-as-usual to seek better evidence for or against their widespread use in community settings. Our research questions: 1. In people with chronic pain and low income and/or low literacy, does participating in a health-literacy-adapted psychosocial treatment improve their pain and interference in daily activities due to pain by the end of treatment when compared with a group receiving typical medical care, and are these effects maintained 6 months later? 2. Does participation in the CBT pain management group improve symptoms of depression better than a pain education group by the end of treatment, and are these effects maintained 6 months later? In partnership with a federally qualified health center, we will enroll 294 patients with chronic pain. Main outcomes will be patient-reported pain intensity, pain interference, depression, and perceived change. From an earlier trial, we expect that our participants will be ~75% female and ~70% African American, and will have low literacy and low income (~60% in the low 15% nationally on word reading, and 90% at or below the poverty threshold).
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and cost analysis of intravenous fentanyl combined with either local anesthesia infiltration or peroneal nerves block in patients with Hallux Valgus undergoing orthopedic corrective surgery and compared with patients without local anesthetics administration perioperatively.
This study compares buprenorphine/naloxone to opioid dose escalation among patients with poorly controlled non-cancer pain on 30-100 mg daily morphine equivalent opioid dose.