View clinical trials related to Pain, Procedural.
Filter by:Persistent postoperative pain occurs up to 25 to 60 % after mastectomy. This occurs at a higher frequency than the rate of invasive surgery.Therefore, many ways have been tried to study risk factors. A study was conducted to predict postoperative pain for items (preoperative pain, sensitivity, pain prediction). As a result, it was reported that the scope of surgery, pre-operative pain, young age, and depression were associated with persistent pain. This study try to find out whether persistent pain after mastectomy is affected anesthetic factors appropriate anesthesia depth and opioid using standardized monitoring devices limited to similar surgical ranges.
Thoracic surgery, and surgery involving the chest wall in general, is associated with poorly controlled acute pain, which may result in delayed functional recovery, and may progress to chronic pain. Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia regimens are a key component of the thoracic surgery enhanced recovery pathway, the aim of which is to improve outcomes in patients undergoing both minimally invasive and open thoracic surgical procedures. Novel interfascial plane blocks are emerging as feasible alternatives to central neuraxial analgesia techniques in a variety of clinical settings. The aim of this study is to show non-inferiority of serratus anterior blockade compared with surgically placed paravertebral blocks in the management of perioperative acute pain in patients undergoing VATS procedures.
Immersive virtual reality (iVR) has been used successfully to manage pain with distraction. It is a non-invasive treatment modality unassociated with worrisome well-known side effects typically seen when opioids and NSAIDS are used, and has previously been used safely in place of analgesia during dressing changes and burn care. This study investigates whether iVR can be useful as a stand-alone option to manage the pain associated with placement of peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters in adults.
Venipuncture and intravenous (IV) access continue to be the most common causes of pain and distress among children in the pediatric emergency department. Virtual reality has been successful for reducing pain and fear in many clinical scenarios, including port access in oncology patients, anxiety disorders, phobias, burn and wound care and others. There is only one previous study examining virtual reality distraction to reduce procedural pain during IV insertion in pediatric patients and no previous studies examining this in the emergency department setting. In this study, the investigators will compare immersive virtual reality (an interactive underwater environment) to the current standard (tablet device/iPad playing a movie) for distraction to reduce procedural pain during IV insertion. The investigators hypothesize that the immersive quality of the virtual reality will reduce patient's pain scores, fear scores and tachycardia during and after the procedure, and have minimal effect on departmental flow and nursing satisfaction. If this feasibility pilot study yields positive results, the investigators plan to expand to a larger randomized control trial.
clinical comparison between alvogyl and gelatin sponge when used to protect the denuded area of the palatal donor site after free gingival graft in means of reducing pain and healing.
Neonates undergo several painful procedures and these pain experiences can alter clinical outcome and behavior. The investigators aim to investigate the analgesic effect of low level laser for procedural pain during heel lancing of term neonates.
Dexmedetomidine is allowed in Switzerland for intravenous (IV) medication in the intensive care unit in the adult patient. Its active molecule, Dexmedetomidine (Dex), is a selective and powerful α2-Adrenoreceptors (AR) agonist that shows the following complementary properties: anxiolytic, sedative and analgesic. Moreover, it displays interesting cardiovascular, respiratory and neuropsychic safety and tolerance profiles. There is increasing number of promising studies for the use of intranasal (IN) Dex in pediatric sedation due to its non-invasive nature, its efficiency and its rare secondary effects. However, there is currently no information in the literature on the use of IN Dex in elderly multi-medicated patients in palliative care. In this end-of-life population, pain is controlled with administration of opioids. Procedures, such as nursing cares, can generate pain and anxiety to the patient. Preventive analgesia, subcutaneous (SC) opioids, is administered before the care. However, most of the time, this additional dose fails to relieve the patient from his pain. In SPdol observational study, 42% daily hygiene and comfort nursing care remained painful despite the administration of a preventive analgesia. IN Dex seems to be a good candidate for non-invasive analgesia and sedation in patients admitted in palliative care before the nursing procedure. In this study, the investigators compare the efficiency of IN Dex to the regular extradose of SC opioids for analgesia before daily nursing care on elderly patients in the palliative care unit. The study design is a cross over, two-sided, superiority, double-blind, placebo-controlled and randomized clinical trial.
Children with chronic diseases, particularly those who have received transplantation (e.g. cardiac, renal, or liver) are a population who undergo frequent painful procedures, such as venipuncture multiple times per week. There is currently no standard of care for pain reduction during venipuncture for pediatric patients having blood drawn in phlebotomy as an outpatient. The study aims to determine the efficacy of distraction in reducing procedural pain and distress associated with venipuncture in pediatric post-transplant patients.
Procedural pain is the most intense and often undertreated pain associated with burn injuries. The use of analgesics does not always provide optimal relief and is accompanied by several side effects. Indeed, children with burn injuries still experience severe pain intensity during procedures despite the fact that doses of analgesics used with this population has almost doubled in the last twenty years. Current guidelines on pediatric procedural pain management recommend the combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions to enhance pain management and decrease the numerous side effects of analgesics. Distraction has been identified among the most effective non-pharmacological interventions for pain as it diverts the child's attention to an attractive element, hindering the perception of the painful stimuli. Virtual reality is a method of active distraction that offers the child a multi-sensory immersive interaction that found many applications for pain management in adult patients. However, very few studies have tested the efficacy of distraction by virtual reality on procedural pain and anxiety in children with burn injuries. This RCT follows a pilot study (NCT02794103) aimed at assessing the feasibility of a virtual reality prototype developed specifically for the hydrotherapy room of children under seven years old for the relief of procedural pain in children with burn injuries. The aim of the RCT will be to evaluate the effectiveness of the virtual reality prototype in relieving procedural pain in children from 6 months to 7 years old undergoing hydrotherapy session for burn injuries.
This study will assess the impact of virtual reality (VR) in decreasing procedural pain related to subcutaneous port (SCP) access in children with cancer. The study is a pilot-randomized controlled trial (RCT) using a cross-over design that will provide us with detailed information on the feasibility of implementing our trial protocol in a future multi-center RCT as well as preliminary estimate of VR treatment effect on children with cancer undergoing SCP access, including child and parent factors potentially associated with VR distraction treatment efficacy.