Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03969277
Other study ID # 141001
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 15, 2019
Est. completion date June 30, 2021

Study information

Verified date June 2021
Source Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This randomized-controlled trial aims to investigate the efficacy of Graded Motor Imagery (GMI) on function, pain, and range of motion (ROM) in patients with a posttraumatic stiff elbow.


Description:

To investigate the efficacy of GMI on function, pain, and ROM in elbow limitation, voluntary patients with elbow limitation, aged between 20-55 years will be randomly divided into two groups: GMI group and standard rehabilitation (SR) group. Interventions will be applied for 12 sessions. The patients will be assessed before, after six-week treatment and six-week follow-up. The pain on activity, at rest and at night will be assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Pain pressure threshold of the elbow and soft tissue around the elbow will be evaluated by digital pressure algometry. ROM will be assessed with a digital goniometer. Isometric muscle strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer of elbow flexors and extensors. Grip strength will also be assessed. Recognise™ will be used for assessing the right-left discrimination. The functional status and kinesiophobia will be evaluated by Disabilities Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, respectively. The Global Rating of Change will be used to evaluate patient satisfaction. The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire 2 (VMIQ-2) will be used for evaluating the individuals' ability to mental imaginary.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date June 30, 2021
Est. primary completion date October 1, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 20 Years to 55 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Subjects will be included with - Aged between 20 and 55 years - Elbow fracture in the six months before the study - Elbow limitation in flexion or extension - Being a volunteer to participate - Fractures should be managed with surgically - The "Standardized Mini Mental Test" result must be at least 24 points Exclusion Criteria: - Malunion or Nonunion Fracture - The occurrence of complex regional pain syndrome, peripheric nerve injury, heterotopic ossification, myositis ossification or post-traumatic ankylosing - Non-healing wound or infection - Previously received physiotherapy for elbow limitation - Having any cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, rheumatic diseases or psychiatric diseases - Could not adjust to the treatment - Shoulder, elbow or wrist movement limitation in contralateral upper extremity or absence of limbs in the contralateral upper extremity - Having severe visual loss

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Graded Motor Imagery
The first stage of GMI includes laterality reconstruction. Patients will view and determine if the various images of body parts to image portrays the right or left side. The second stage targets activation of the primary motor cortex by imagine moving the involved body part. The final stage involves that the patient watches the unaffected body part moving in a mirror to "trick" the brain into thinking the affected body part is actually moving in a pain-free way. This will be applied for 6 weeks.
Standard Rehabilitation
Shoulder, elbow and wrist AROM exercises. Elbow flexion and extension, and wrist flexion and extension stretching exercises. Elbow and wrist strengthening exercises. Grip strengthening exercises. This will be applied for 6 weeks.
Home Exercise Program
Proprioception exercises for the elbow. Scapulothoracic strengthening exercises. This will be applied for 6 weeks.
Cold Application
Cold application around the elbow joint for 15 minutes in every session.

Locations

Country Name City State
Turkey Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Istanbul Bakirkoy

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Turkey, 

References & Publications (5)

Birinci T, Razak Ozdincler A, Altun S, Kural C. A structured exercise programme combined with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching or static stretching in posttraumatic stiffness of the elbow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2 — View Citation

Dilek B, Ayhan C, Yagci G, Yakut Y. Effectiveness of the graded motor imagery to improve hand function in patients with distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Ther. 2018 Jan - Mar;31(1):2-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.09.004. Epub 2 — View Citation

Méndez-Rebolledo G, Gatica-Rojas V, Torres-Cueco R, Albornoz-Verdugo M, Guzmán-Muñoz E. Update on the effects of graded motor imagery and mirror therapy on complex regional pain syndrome type 1: A systematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(3 — View Citation

Priganc VW, Stralka SW. Graded motor imagery. J Hand Ther. 2011 Apr-Jun;24(2):164-8; quiz 169. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.11.002. Epub 2011 Feb 9. — View Citation

Sawyer EE, McDevitt AW, Louw A, Puentedura EJ, Mintken PE. Use of Pain Neuroscience Education, Tactile Discrimination, and Graded Motor Imagery in an Individual With Frozen Shoulder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Mar;48(3):174-184. doi: 10.2519/jospt.20 — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Functional Status The functional status of the patients will be evaluated by The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). It comprises 30 core questions and optional additional 8 questions that are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (no difficulty-unable). The cumulative DASH score is ranged from 0 to 100, where the higher scores indicate an increased degree of disability. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Pain Intensity Pain intensity will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The participants will be asked to indicate their perceived pain at rest, during activity and at night on the 10 cm line between no pain and terrible pain. The score will be determined by measuring the distance on 10 cm line using a ruler. The higher scores indicate an higher level of pain. Baseline
Secondary Pain Intensity Pain intensity will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The participants will be asked to indicate their perceived pain at rest, during activity and at night on the 10 cm line between no pain and terrible pain. The score will be determined by measuring the distance on 10 cm line using a ruler. The higher scores indicate an higher level of pain. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Pain Intensity Pain intensity will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The participants will be asked to indicate their perceived pain at rest, during activity and at night on the 10 cm line between no pain and terrible pain. The score will be determined by measuring the distance on 10 cm line using a ruler. The higher scores indicate an higher level of pain. 6-week follow-up
Secondary Active Range of Motion (AROM) Assessment The elbow's and forearm's AROM, including flexion, extension, supination, pronation will be measured described by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) using a universal goniometer. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. Baseline
Secondary Active Range of Motion (AROM) Assessment The elbow's and forearm's AROM, including flexion, extension, supination, pronation will be measured described by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) using a universal goniometer. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Active Range of Motion (AROM) Assessment The elbow's and forearm's AROM, including flexion, extension, supination, pronation will be measured described by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) using a universal goniometer. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. 6-week follow-up
Secondary Functional Status The functional status of the patients will be evaluated by The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). It comprises 30 core questions and optional additional 8 questions that are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (no difficulty-unable). The cumulative DASH score is ranged from 0 to 100, where the higher scores indicate an increased degree of disability. Baseline
Secondary Functional Status The functional status of the patients will be evaluated by The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). It comprises 30 core questions and optional additional 8 questions that are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (no difficulty-unable). The cumulative DASH score is ranged from 0 to 100, where the higher scores indicate an increased degree of disability. 6-week follow-up
Secondary Fear of movement (kinesiophobia) Kinesiophobia of the patients will be assessed by Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. It is a 17-item questionnaire scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree-strongly agree). The total score of the scale ranged from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating more kinesiophobia. Baseline
Secondary Fear of movement (kinesiophobia) Kinesiophobia of the patients will be assessed by Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. It is a 17-item questionnaire scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree-strongly agree). The total score of the scale ranged from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating more kinesiophobia. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Fear of movement (kinesiophobia) Kinesiophobia of the patients will be assessed by Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia. It is a 17-item questionnaire scored on a 4-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree-strongly agree). The total score of the scale ranged from 17 to 68, with higher scores indicating more kinesiophobia. 6-week follow-up
Secondary Patient Satisfaction Patient satisfaction regarding improvement in elbow function will be assessed by the Global Rating of Change scale. The participants will be asked to rate their condition after a six-week intervention period compared to baseline by indicating whether they have improved significantly, improved slightly, unchanged, deteriorated slightly, or deteriorated significantly in this study. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Right-Left Discrimination Right-Left Discrimination will be assessed with Recognise™ application. It tests the patients' ability to quickly and accurately recognise an image of a body area as either left or right ('Left/Right Discrimination'). The test will be repeated three times and average values will be recorded. Baseline
Secondary Right-Left Discrimination Right-Left Discrimination will be assessed with Recognise™ application. It tests the patients' ability to quickly and accurately recognise an image of a body area as either left or right ('Left/Right Discrimination'). The test will be repeated three times and average values will be recorded. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Right-Left Discrimination Right-Left Discrimination will be assessed with Recognise™ application. It tests the patients' ability to quickly and accurately recognise an image of a body area as either left or right ('Left/Right Discrimination'). The test will be repeated three times and average values will be recorded. 6-week follow-up
Secondary Vividness of Movement imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 (VMIQ-2) will be used to measure the vividness of imagery. It comprises three subscales and 12 core questions that are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (Perfectly clear and as vivid (as normal vision or feel of movement) - No image at all, you only "know" that you are thinking of the skill). The subscales scores (External Visual Imagery, Internal Visual Imagery, and Kinaesthetic imagery) are ranged from 1 to 60, where the higher scores indicate a decreased ability of vividness of imagery. Baseline
Secondary Pain pressure threshold Pain pressure threshold of the elbow and soft tissue around the elbow will be evaluated by digital pressure algometry. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. Baseline
Secondary Pain pressure threshold Pain pressure threshold of the elbow and soft tissue around the elbow will be evaluated by digital pressure algometry. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Pain pressure threshold Pain pressure threshold of the elbow and soft tissue around the elbow will be evaluated by digital pressure algometry. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. 6-week follow-up
Secondary Muscle strength Isometric muscle strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer for elbow flexors and extensors. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Muscle strength Isometric muscle strength will be measured with a handheld dynamometer for elbow flexors and extensors. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. 6-week follow-up
Secondary Grip strength Grip strength will be assessed with JAMAR hydraulic hand dynamometer. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. After the six-week intervention
Secondary Grip strength Grip strength will be assessed with JAMAR hydraulic hand dynamometer. The process will be repeated three times in each direction, with the average value recorded. 6-week follow-up
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05480111 - The Role of Quadratus Lumborum Blocks Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Phase 4
Completed NCT06129305 - Erector Spina Muscle Distance From the Skin at Different Thoracal Elevations
Completed NCT04401826 - Micro-surgical Treatment of Gummy Smile N/A
Recruiting NCT04020133 - the Role of Popliteal Plexus Block in Pain Management After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. N/A
Completed NCT03023462 - Efficacy of an Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block vs. a TAP-block for Inguinal Hernia Repair N/A
Completed NCT03546738 - Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation for Chronic Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Spine Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03652103 - Efficiency of Erector Spinae Plane Block For Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT03528343 - Narcotic vs. Non-narcotic Pain Regimens After Pediatric Appendectomy Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT03261193 - ITM + Bupivacaine QLB vs. ITM + Sham Saline QLB for Cesarean Delivery Pain Phase 3
Completed NCT02525133 - Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty Phase 3
Completed NCT03244540 - Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05316168 - Post Operative Pain Management for ACL Reconstruction Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04130464 - Intraperitoneal Infusion of Analgesic for Postoperative Pain Management Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT04574791 - Addition of Muscle Relaxants in a Multimodal Analgesic Regimen for Analgesia After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty N/A
Completed NCT04073069 - Scalp Infiltration With Diprospan Plus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy in Adults Phase 4
Completed NCT04526236 - Influence of Aging on Perioperative Methadone Dosing Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05351229 - Intrathecal Morphine for Analgesia in Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery Phase 4
Enrolling by invitation NCT05543109 - Ultrasound Guided Psoas Compartment Block vs Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block N/A
Completed NCT05346588 - THRIVE Feasibility Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT04919317 - Combination Dexamethasone and Bupivacaine Pain Control in Reduction Mammaplasty Phase 2

External Links