Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05365568
Other study ID # V1.0_20220328
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2022
Est. completion date September 1, 2024

Study information

Verified date October 2022
Source AZ Sint-Jan AV
Contact Jean-Benoît le Polain de Waroux, MD, PhD
Phone +32 50 45 26 70
Email Jean-Benoit.LePolainDeWaroux@AZsintjan.be
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The aim of this study proposal is to compare the effectiveness of two distinct pacing modalities for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Our primary hypothesis is that left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) using conventional stylet driven pacemaker leads is an effective resynchronization method that yield to at least similar clinical benefits and outcomes when compare to biventricular pacing.


Description:

Recently some retrospective or uncontrolled studies were published that compared cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and biventricular pacing (BiV), although with a limited number of patients. Moreover, only one of these studies compared LBBAP + right ventricle stimulation to conventional BiV stimulation prospectively. None of the studies used conventional stylet-driven pacemaker leads for LBBAP. Therefore, the present trial aims to fill-in the gap in the current literature regarding LBBAP for CRT and provide a first randomized head-to-head comparison against CRT. The aim of this study proposal is to compare the effectiveness of two distinct pacing modalities for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Our primary hypothesis is that left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) using conventional stylet driven pacemaker leads is an effective resynchronization method that yields to at least similar clinical benefits and outcomes when compared to biventricular pacing. The study is a multicentre, randomized trial comparing LBBAP against biventricular pacing. After characterization of the type device implanted (Pacing or Defibrillator), randomization will occur between both groups in a 1:1 ratio. The trial purpose is to demonstrate the efficacy of LBBAP to treat clinical heart failure in-patient indicated to receive a CRT.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 170
Est. completion date September 1, 2024
Est. primary completion date September 1, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 99 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Aged 18 or above - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and NYHA meeting one off the previous indications documented with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) no later than 3 months before randomization. - New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV - Baseline left bundle branch block and QRS >130ms or QRS >150ms of any morphology or a wide paced QRS duration. Exclusion Criteria: - < 18 years age - Pregnancy - Any unstable medical condition, life expectancy < 12 months - Inability to provide consent or to undergo follow-up - Narrow QRS duration (=130ms) or prolonged QRS duration with typical Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB) morphology on 12 lead ECG and sinus rhythm. - Significant hypertrophic cardiomyopathy - any septum abnormality contra-indicating LBBAP implantation (according to physician's evaluation) - Patients who are unable to perform a 6 minute walk test (6MWT) Note: patients should be able to perform a 6 minute walk test, but it is not a requirement to have the test performed before the procedure (e.g. due to inability of planning).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP)
Left bundle branch area pacing using conventional stylet driven pacemaker leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy
Biventricular pacing (BiV)
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BiV)

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium AZ Sint-Jan Brugge Brugge West-Vlaanderen
Belgium UZA Edegem Antwerpen
Belgium UZ Gent Gent Oost-Vlaanderen
Belgium Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt Hasselt Limburg
Belgium UZ Leuven Leuven Vlaams-Brabant
Belgium CHR Citadelle Liège Liège
Belgium Clinique Saint-Pierre Ottignies Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Waals-Brabant
Belgium AZ Delta Roeselare West-Vlaanderen
Belgium UCL Saint-Luc Woluwe-Saint-Lambert Vlaams-Brabant

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
AZ Sint-Jan AV

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Number of days elapsed from study procedure to first occurrence of one of the following events (combined endpoint) or to study close-out in the total patient population. First occurrence of one of the following clinical events: death, hospitalization or unscheduled visit for heart failure (HF) or worsening HF symptoms with adaptation of the medical therapy, implant failure for any cause, implantable electronic cardiac device (IECD) re-intervention for any reason during follow-up (Lead Dislocation/phrenic nerve stimulation…) 12 months
Secondary Improvement of procedural characteristics: Operative and fluoroscopic times Improvement of procedural characteristics: Operative and fluoroscopic times 1 day
Secondary Correction of electrical desynchrony post-implant Correction of electrical desynchrony post-implant, at 1/6/12 months 1/6/12 months
Secondary Clinical functional response (6MWT) Clinical functional response as evaluated by the improvement of the 6 Minutes Walk Test (6MWT) at 6 months follow-up 6 months
Secondary Left ventricular reverse remodelling Left ventricular reverse remodelling at 6 and 12 months follow-up as evaluated by the reduction of the Left Ventricular End-systolic Volume (LVESV) using trans-thoracal echocardiography 6/12 months
Secondary Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies ICD therapies at 6 and 12 months 6/12 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05077293 - Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
Completed NCT03614169 - Direct HIS-pacing as an Alternative to BiV-pacing in Symptomatic HFrEF Patients With True LBBB N/A
Recruiting NCT05278962 - HF Patients With LVADs Being Treated With SGLT2i Phase 4
Completed NCT04210375 - Study of JK07 in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) Phase 1
Completed NCT05001165 - Dashboard Activated Services and Tele-Health for Heart Failure N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03701880 - Early Use of Ivabradine in Heart Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT05650658 - Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05992116 - Iron Deficiency in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Active, not recruiting NCT05204238 - Follow Up of acuTe Heart failUre: a pRospective Echocardiographic and Clinical Study (FUTURE)
Not yet recruiting NCT04420065 - Effects of Preferential Left Ventricular Pacing on Ventriculoarterial Coupling and Clinical Course of Heart Failure N/A
Terminated NCT03479424 - Home Outpatient Monitoring and Engagement to Predict HF Exacerbation
Completed NCT02113033 - VAgal Nerve Stimulation: safeGUARDing Heart Failure Patients Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03209180 - Immediate Release Versus Slow Release Carvedilol in Heart Failure Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05299879 - Screening for Advanced Heart Failure IN Stable ouTpatientS - The SAINTS Study
Recruiting NCT05637853 - Telemonitored Fast Track Medical Sequencing for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Completed NCT03870074 - CPET Predicts Long-term Survival and Positive Response to CRT
Recruiting NCT04590001 - Effect of the MobiusHD® in Patients With Heart Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT05072054 - Comparison of Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Rosuvastatin on Cardiac Function in Heart Failure Patients Phase 4
Completed NCT06233695 - Gender-based Differences in the Outcome of Treatment With Aldosterone Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure
Completed NCT03951740 - Validation of Two Wrist-worn Devices for the Assessment of Energy Expenditure in Cardiac Patients. N/A