Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Statins have a protective effect in patients with established heart failure because of their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects. There is no randomized controlled trial comparing lipophilic versus hydrophilic statins in these patients (head to head comparison). The best evidence so far is from a meta-analysis in which the authors did an adjusted indirect comparison between lipophilic statins and rosuvastatin and found that lipophilic statins were associated with significantly lower incidence of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and hospitalization for worsening heart failure compared to rosuvastatin (hydrophilic statin) among patients with heart failure. So, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on cardiac function in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.


Clinical Trial Description

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors or Statins have been widely used for primary prevention and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Also, the protective effect of statins has been observed in patients with established heart failure because of their lipid-lowering and pleiotropic effects. Various randomized and non-randomized clinical trials have evaluated statins like Atorvastatin, Rosuvastatin, Simvastatin, Pitavastatin and reported improved clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction as well as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Similar benefits on improved cardiac function, reduced inflammation, and improved mortality have been seen in small randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with Atorvastatin. The two large RCTs - Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Study in Heart Failure (CORONA) and Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Insufficienza cardiac (GISSI-HF) - which compared Rosuvastatin versus placebo, failed to show statistically significant benefits in mortality outcomes in heart failure patients compared to placebo, although CORONA trial did show a significant reduction in hospital admissions but not on mortality. However, these two large trials only compared one statin i.e rosuvastatin versus placebo; which is a hydrophilic statin. Statin is not a uniform class of drugs. They differ in their pleiotropic effects based on lipophilic nature. There is evidence that lipophilic statins enter cells via passive diffusion and are widely distributed to various tissues including cardiac tissues where it exerts pleiotropic actions whereas uptake of hydrophilic statins is via carrier-mediated mechanisms and is restricted to the liver, thus reduced the capacity of non-lipid effects on extra-hepatic tissues. Currently, there is no RCT comparing lipophilic statin versus hydrophilic statin (head to head comparison). The best evidence so far is from a meta-analysis which is an adjusted indirect comparison between lipophilic statins and rosuvastatin. They found that lipophilic statins were associated with a significantly lower incidence of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and hospitalization for worsening heart failure compared to rosuvastatin (hydrophilic statin) among patients with heart failure. So, the investigators plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on cardiac function and inflammation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05072054
Study type Interventional
Source Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Contact Ashish Kakkar, MD, DM
Phone 91-172-2755297
Email drashishkakkar@gmail.com
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 4
Start date October 16, 2019
Completion date August 31, 2022

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05077293 - Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure
Completed NCT03614169 - Direct HIS-pacing as an Alternative to BiV-pacing in Symptomatic HFrEF Patients With True LBBB N/A
Recruiting NCT05278962 - HF Patients With LVADs Being Treated With SGLT2i Phase 4
Completed NCT04210375 - Study of JK07 in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) Phase 1
Completed NCT05001165 - Dashboard Activated Services and Tele-Health for Heart Failure N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT03701880 - Early Use of Ivabradine in Heart Failure N/A
Recruiting NCT05650658 - Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05992116 - Iron Deficiency in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting NCT05365568 - Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Randomized Study N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05204238 - Follow Up of acuTe Heart failUre: a pRospective Echocardiographic and Clinical Study (FUTURE)
Not yet recruiting NCT04420065 - Effects of Preferential Left Ventricular Pacing on Ventriculoarterial Coupling and Clinical Course of Heart Failure N/A
Terminated NCT03479424 - Home Outpatient Monitoring and Engagement to Predict HF Exacerbation
Completed NCT02113033 - VAgal Nerve Stimulation: safeGUARDing Heart Failure Patients Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03209180 - Immediate Release Versus Slow Release Carvedilol in Heart Failure Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05299879 - Screening for Advanced Heart Failure IN Stable ouTpatientS - The SAINTS Study
Recruiting NCT05637853 - Telemonitored Fast Track Medical Sequencing for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Completed NCT03870074 - CPET Predicts Long-term Survival and Positive Response to CRT
Recruiting NCT04590001 - Effect of the MobiusHD® in Patients With Heart Failure N/A
Completed NCT06233695 - Gender-based Differences in the Outcome of Treatment With Aldosterone Antagonists in Patients With Heart Failure
Completed NCT03951740 - Validation of Two Wrist-worn Devices for the Assessment of Energy Expenditure in Cardiac Patients. N/A