View clinical trials related to Osteoarthritis, Knee.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to investigate, whether a patient education with focus on pain coping is able to improve physical function and experienced pain level in patients with high levels of pain catastrophizing before Total Knee Arthroplasty. Resent studies indicates that these patients do not achieve a satisfactory pain relief and physical function after TKA. Furthermore, the aim is to determine if there is a difference in physical activity and muscle mass among patients with high levels of pain catastrophizing compared to patients with low levels of pain catastrophizing.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of post-operative ROM between Flex IM rod and Rigid IM rod, to collect bone morphology of Japanese lower extremity and to research the incidence of overhung with Flex IM rod.
The NUsurface® Meniscus Implant SUN Clinical Trial is a multi-center, single-arm, prospective, open label, non-randomized, observational clinical trial to gather safety and probable clinical benefit data on the NUsurface® Meniscus Implant in treated the target population.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures. Approximately 84,000 knee replacement procedures were recorded in the UK in 2012. The main goal of TKA is to relieve the disabling pain of arthritic disease. Patient satisfaction following TKA is related to quick recovery and return to daily activities. This can be dependent on the design of the implant used in the knee. Improvements in implant design and surgical technique mean many modern designs offer implant survival rates beyond 10 - 15 years. As cost pressure increases in the NHS the unit cost of implants is now being scrutinised, particularly with regard to cost effectiveness. The Press-Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma implant can be used with either a conventional metal backed or alternatively an all polyethylene tibial component (part fitted to the shin bone), the latter considerably cheaper to manufacture. Four small prospective randomised trials and one large regional registry study with long follow up support the safe use of all polyethylene tibial components in TKA. The investigators will therefore undertake a prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the results of all polyethylene tibial components with those of conventional metal backed tibial components in patients aged 75 or over, comparing both clinical outcome and radiological survivorship. The type of knee replacement used for each patient (metal-backed or polyethylene) will be chosen at random once a patient has agreed to take part in the study. Data will be collected by means of follow-up appointments and questionnaires and clinical tests both before the operation 1 year, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. This will allow us to see how both types of knee replacement perform over time and if one performs better than the other in terms of patients movement, pain and functional activities.
Unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be used as the treatment of knee OA isolated to a single compartment instead of TKA. Both UKA and TKA have been used for decades as a treatment of knee OA. However, operative indications for TKA and UKA overlaps, but they are not similar. Therefore, the outcome or survivorship of these procedures cannot be compared directly. Some advantages of UKA over TKA have been reported, including faster recovery time, reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality, a subjective preference of feeling more normal knee, lower cost and improved return to work and sport. On the other side national arthroplasty registers consistently report around a threefold increase in crude cumulative revision rate at 8 to 10 years for UKA compared with TKA 7-10. The aim of this study is to compare functional, clinical, patient satisfaction, and implant survival results of cementless UKA with those of cemented TKA at 2 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after the procedure. The study design is a multicenter, double-blind and randomized trial of knee replacement patients. The primary outcome is the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 2 year.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the JOURNEY™ II CR Total Knee System in subjects with degenerative joint disease (DJD) requiring primary total knee replacement.
This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with no to moderate anteromedial knee osteoarthritis. TKA patients will receive the Zimmer Persona (Warsaw, IN) posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty, while UKA patients will receive the Biomet Oxford (Warsaw, IN) mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Outcome measures will include Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaires, as well as biomechanics and EMG analysis from the investigating gait lab. The investigators hypothesize that post-operative UKA patients will display higher clinical scores using WOMAC and OKS questionnaires, and superior biomechanical analysis measures. The investigators further hypothesize that the biomechanics data will assist in the understanding of the outcome score differential both pre- and post-operatively in both groups, as well as between-groups. Total follow up period will be two years.
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of Imrecoxib, an anti-infiammatory/analgesic agent that primarily inhibits COX-2 and not COX-1 at therapeutic doses, on the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile and hypoprothrombinemic effect of warfarin in healthy volunteers.
Prescribing exercise for people with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for pain management, improved function, and chronic disease prevention. Exercise that decreases joint exposure to damaging loading while eliciting adequate muscular activation for strength improvements is ideal. The purpose of this 3-arm RCT is to compare mobility, strength, pain, and MRI outcomes between the low-loading biomechanical exercise program (BE), a traditional exercise program for knee OA (TE), and a control group completing meditation classes (M).
Purpose: To determine the safety, feasibility and effectiveness (clinical and radiological) of intra-articular administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with platelet richa plasma (PRGF) in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Patients and methods Clinical trial phase I- II, randomized , multicenter , with two treatment arms and 19 patients for each group. The investigators compare the intraarticular injection of against the administration of two different doses of mesenchymal stem cells with hialuronic acid according to the following scheme: 1. Group A: 3 intra-articular injections of platelet rich plasma (PRGF®) separated by 7 days. 2. Group B: 3 intra-articular injections of platelet richa plasma (PRGF®) separated by 7 days and one with Mesenchimal stems cells. Intra-articular injection of 100 million autologous mesenchymal progenitor stem cells cultured ex - vivo (cell suspension sterile small volume (5-10 ml ) in a vehicle suitable for intraarticular injection ) followed by an intraarticular injection of platelet richa plasma (PRGF®). The treatment is completed with 2 more injection of platelet richa plasma (PRGF®) separeted by one week. In addition the investigators assess the response to intra-articular infusion of CMM analyzing the following parameters: - Clinical assessment of pain and function (Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months since treatment): VAS , WOMAC , KOOS , EuroQol, SF-16, Lequesne , WOMAC , KOOS. - Radiographic (baseline and 12 months from treatment): Femorotibial space. - Radiographic using MRI (baseline and 12 months from treatment): by assessing the number location of the lesions , cartilage thickness , signal intensity , subchondral bone alteration , volume and WORMS and dGEMRIC protocols.