View clinical trials related to Oesophageal Cancer.
Filter by:Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide and is responsible for an estimated 9.6 million deaths yearly. Cancer-related deaths can be reduced if patients are diagnosed and treated early. Delay in cancer diagnosis can occur at any point along the diagnostic spectrum, from the first observation of symptoms to the start of treatment. Diagnosing cancer when it is still at an early stage, before it has spread, gives surgery, radiotherapy and other treatments the best chance of working. Therefore, early diagnosis is the most important way to improve cancer outcomes. Most of the cancers usually presents with vague and non-alarming symptoms. Most individuals are diagnosed late when the cancer has already spread, and the prognosis is poor. There are over 200 different types of cancer that can cause many different signs and symptoms. Sometimes symptoms affect specific body areas, such as abdomen or skin. But signs can also be more general, and include weight loss, tiredness (fatigue) or unexplained pain. The type of symptoms varies from person to person. The major reasons for not presenting to the GP with symptoms such as these are "not wanting to waste the GP's time" and normalisation of these symptoms. The persistence of a symptom, social influence and awareness encourage help-seeking behaviours in primary care. However, few believe their symptom(s) might be a sign of cancer. Consequently, people might choose to self-manage their symptoms by using over-the-counter medication, and to seek advice from other sources, (pharmacists, family, internet), rather than a primary care physician. RATIONALE FOR CURRENT STUDY An early cancer diagnosis is essential for receiving treatment as early as possible to have the best chance for successful treatment. Early diagnosis of cancer can be challenging. Sometimes, the cancer symptoms resemble common illnesses and could resolve with the use of over-the-counter medications and other remedies until they become persistent or debilitating. The present study focuses on ten cancer forms: colon, oesophageal, stomach, liver, bladder, uterine, vulval, ovarian, endometrial and pancreatic. Patients diagnosed with the cancers mentioned above often report experiencing vague symptoms (such as abdominal or back pain, indigestion, feeling full etc). They often use over-the-counter medication to manage their symptoms before seeing a doctor. Information about how often and what products participants purchase (e.g. pain killers, digestive products and natural remedies) to care for these symptoms could help identify these cancers a few crucial weeks or months earlier and encourage people to seek help sooner from their doctors.
This is an observational trial that will look at patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in patients with oesophageal cancer and to determine the proportion of cases in which EUS changes disease management in these patients.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about long term symptoms in oesophageal cancer survivors. The main question it aims to answer is are: - Study the changes in gut bacteria by examining saliva, stool and blood. - Investigate the products of bacteria in breath to develop a non-invasive breath test to detect the changes in gut bacteria. - Develop new strategies to treat this change and trial new treatments to improve quality- of-life in oesophageal cancer survivors. Participants will attend an outpatient clinic, fasted for at least 4 hours for collection of breath, saliva, blood, urine, stool and complete validated healthy-related quality-of-life questionnaires. Researchers will compare symptomatic and asymptomatic participants to detect the changes stated above.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the addition of the stereotactic body radiotherapy and durvalumab to a well tolerated 2 week chemotherapy and radiation treatment regimen in people with oesophageal cancer that has spread to another are of the body (metastasised).
The provision of preoperative interventions (prehabilitation: including exercise, nutrition, and psychological treatment) have been reported to reduce postoperative complications by as much as 50% and reduce hospital stay by up to 4 days compared to standard of care. Postoperative multimodal interventions are likely to further benefit patients facing new challenges (e.g. stoma care), and reduce post discharge complications. Therefore the Virtual Multimodal hub of PRIORITY-CONNECT 2 Pilot Trial aims to primarily; determine the feasibility of incorporating a virtual multimodal program into the preoperative and postoperative period for patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery, the acceptability to patients, clinicians and carers of the virtual multimodal program and the acceptability to patients of being randomised to the virtual multimodal program or usual care. The secondary aim is to obtain pilot data on the likely difference in key outcomes (30 days postoperative complications, quality of life, days at home and alive at 30 days - DAH30, implementation outcomes and cost outcomes) to inform the development of a substantive randomised clinical trial.
Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is a cancer of the food pipe that affects around 2000 patients in the UK every year. It is often detected at an advanced stage, resulting in poor survival (5-year survival less than 20%). Early detection can improve survival (5-year survival >70%). Therefore, early detection is vital to improving survival. There are no national screening guidelines, and an endoscopy (A camera test to look at the food pipe) is the only available test to detect OSCC. Early detection of OSCC is challenging for many reasons. Firstly, early disease symptoms are non-specific, which patients often overlook. Secondly, 'Alarm' symptoms such as weight loss, difficulty swallowing or vomiting blood are signs of advanced stage. Lastly, endoscopy is an invasive test with associated risks and significant discomfort. The investigators propose to develop a breath test for patients with non-specific symptoms. Breath testing has the ideal characteristics for a triage test because it is non-invasive, simple to perform, cost-effective and highly acceptable to patients. The test is based on identifying volatile organic compounds (VOCs, small molecules) that are produced by the cancer and released in breath. The breath test will be offered by General Practitioners (GPs) to patients with non-specific symptoms. Those who test positive will be referred for an urgent camera test, and those who test negative can be reassured.
Our study aims to assess the relationship between the Seismofit® derived VO2 peak estimate and CPET-measured VO2 peak in patients who are having CPET as part of their preoperative workup. Our aim is to establish whether Seismofit® can be considered a cheaper, less resource intensive and better tolerated alternative to the CPET, or whether it might be useful as a screening tool to efficiently identify patients with exercise intolerance who may benefit from further characterisation by CPET.
To determine the long term outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection (EFTR) and Submucosal-Tunnelling Endoscopic Resection (STER) for upper gastrointestinal neoplastic lesions
The primary objectives of this trial are to evaluate the safety and dosimetry of [68Ga]Ga-OncoFAP for detection/imaging of solid tumors.
Rationale Globally, esophageal cancer is the seventh most common cancer type, with over half a million cases reported in 2020. The survival of gastroesophageal cancer is poor and the prognosis is primarily determined by the possibilities for curative treatment. After resection of part of the esophagus and cardia, the reconstruction of the esophagus is performed with a gastric conduit where an anastomosis is made with the proximal esophageal stump. Globally, a Minimally invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) has a high morbidity rate and a mortality rate ranging up to 5% as a result of the procedure. One of the most feared complications is an anastomotic leakage (AL) with a rate of around 12.5% and a mortality rate of around 15%. AL is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased re-operation rates. It is generally accepted that impaired blood flow of the gastric conduit is the most important cause of AL. The surgical procedure of an esophagectomy and reconstruction inherently compromises the blood supply of the gastric conduit. However other than the surgical eye, there is no gold standard in assessing this. Surgeons generally look for traditional indicators of tissue viability such as pulsating vessels, bleeding of the resected edges, tissue color and intestinal motility. However, an objective indication of the tissue perfusion is still lacking, implying the clinical need for one. Objectives In this trial the investigators will study the utility of PerfusiX-Imaging for perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in comparison with the standard of care. Study design The current study is a prospective, observational single-center study in the Medical Center Leeuwarden. Study population A total of 30 patients undergoing an esophageal resection will be included. Patient related study procedures All patients will undergo the standard-of-care program which includes perfusion assessment by the surgical eye and ICG-fluorescence imaging. In addition to this standard-of-care, 2D-perfusion maps will be generated from images taken with PerfusiX-Imaging (LIMIS Development BV, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands) in combination with a standard surgical laparoscope. Not related to the patient, the PerfusiX-Imaging images will be shown to the surgeon postoperatively and peroperative questionnaires will be filled regarding the standard-of-care perfusion assessment. Study parameters/endpoints Due to the explorative character of this study, there is no formal hierarchy in the respective endpoints of this study. In this, all endpoints will add to the overall assessment of the feasibility of the PerfusiX-imaging derived visual feedback. The investigators will look at the percentage of operating surgeons that indicated no change in location of the anastomosis or operating plan based on the additional PerfusiX-Imaging. The percentage of the non-involved surgeons that indicated no change in location of the anastomosis or operating plan based on the additional PerfusiX-Imaging. And the homogeneity of the change in location between non-involved surgeons for individual patients will be analyzed in order to get a sense for the subjectivity of the interpretation of the images. The investigators will also compare the additional PerfusiX-Imaging derived visual feedback to the standard of care by looking at the homogeneity in location of the watershed area between PerfusiX-Imaging, ICG-fluorescence and based on visual assessment by the surgical eye. The difference in the location of watershed area between PerfusiX-Imaging and ICG-fluorescence or based on visual assessment. In order to get a sense of the scale of the indicated change in location of the anastomosis the investigators will look at the estimated change in location of the anastomosis of the gastric conduit/ the esophageal stump in centimeters by the operating surgeon. The estimated change in location of the anastomosis of the gastric conduit/ the esophageal stump in centimeters by non-involved surgeons. Lastly, the investigators will compare the change in the location of the anastomosis by non-involved surgeons in comparison to the operating surgeon; Burden, risk and benefit to participation Burden Not applicable. Risks Not applicable. Benefit Not applicable.