View clinical trials related to Myocardial Ischemia.
Filter by:Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) encompass a spectrum of cardiovascular disorders characterized by the sudden onset of myocardial ischemia. They are primarily caused by atherosclerotic plaque rupture or erosion, leading to partial or complete occlusion of the coronary arteries. Among the various coronary arteries affected, left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) is of particular concern due to its high anatomical significance and potential for adverse outcomes The left main coronary artery (LMCA) is responsible for supplying a substantial portion of the left ventricular myocardium, including the interventricular septum and the anterior and lateral walls. Any obstruction or compromise in blood flow within this critical artery can have severe consequences, including myocardial infarction, heart failure, or even sudden cardiac death. The management of LMCAD associated with ACS represents a significant clinical challenge, necessitating prompt and optimal treatment strategies Among the various coronary arteries affected by atherosclerosis, left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) holds particular clinical significance due to its anatomical location and the vital role it plays in supplying a substantial portion of the left ventricular myocardium. The left main coronary artery (LMCA) typically bifurcates into the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and the left circumflex artery (LCX), which together provide blood supply to the majority of the left ventricle, including the interventricular septum and the anterior and lateral walls The selection of an appropriate treatment strategy for LMCAD associated with ACS is a complex decision that requires careful consideration of multiple factors, including patient characteristics, coronary anatomy, severity of ischemia, and procedural expertise. The emergence of several clinical trials and observational studies exploring the efficacy and safety of different revascularization strategies has further complicated the decision-making process
Coronary atherosclerosis is the most common cause of ischaemic heart disease. About 40-50% of patients with symptoms and documented ischaemia on non-invasive tests do not show obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary angiography. This cause of ischaemic heart disease called INOCA (Ischemic Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery), far from having a benign prognosis, is associated with an increase in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) as well as increased functional limitation. The current European Society of Cardiology clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndrome establish for the first time a IIa recommendation for the invasive analysis of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance index (MRI) in symptomatic patients with INOCA. The acetylcholine (Ach) test, based on intracoronary (ic) administration, is established as indication IIb for the assessment of micro or macrovascular vasospasm in patients with suspected vasospastic angina (VSA) (4). A national multicentre registry would allow us to determine the prevalence of INOCA and its different endotypes in our setting.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the final result of cardiac arrest (CA) , defined as an abrupt and unexpected loss of cardiovascular function resulting in circulatory collapse and death. Up to 50% of cardiac deaths in Europe are due to CA. The estimated mortality of CA is approximately 90%, and significant functional and/or cognitive disabilities often persist among those who survive. The advent of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has revolutionized the prevention of SCD in high-risk patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF<35%). However, the algorithm recommended by current guidelines based on LVEF, considered the only parameter to identify high-risk patients, cannot stratify the population and the spectrum of risk with high accuracy. Although the risk of CA is higher among patients with LVEF<35% and NYHA class>1, because of the enormity of the population size at risk (i.e., with organic heart disease and LVEF>35%), most SCD does occur in patients with LVEF>35%. Additionally, the majority of pts who receive the ICD for primary prevention of SCD will not benefit from the device (in the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial published in 2005, the rate of appropriate ICD therapy was 21% at five years), and/or will experience some side effects of it. In the Israeli registry of patients who underwent ICD (n= 1729) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (n= 1326), the 12-year cumulative incidence of adverse events was 20% for inappropriate shock, 6% for device-related infection, and 17% for lead failure. Moreover, recent improvements in drug treatment for HF and myocardial revascularization have further reduced the incidence of SCD in pts with low LVEF. Finally, pts with advanced HF are unlikely to benefit from ICD therapy because of the high rates of non-arrhythmic deaths. Therefore, improved risk stratification approaches to guide the selection of pts for ICD implantation are needed, and only a multiparametric approach may aim to personalize the risk prediction of SCD across the broad spectrum of the phenotypes of HF patients. The RESPECT project has been designed to personalize the risk of SCD by integrating and interpreting information highly multidisciplinary: clinical and bio-humoral, genetics and electrocardiography, conventional and advanced cardiac imaging, and data science. The investigators hypothesized that machine learning models capable of dealing with non-linearities and complex interactions among predictors, including genetic, clinical, electrocardiographic, bio-humoral, echocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and nuclear cardiology data, would have superior accuracy in predicting the occurrence of SCD compared with the currently recommended metrics of NYHA class and LVEF by two-dimensional echocardiography and that the personalized risk prediction of SCD will translate in more cost-effective use of ICDs. In addition, the investigators will use the multiparametric predictive models to develop a cloud-computing app that will allow clinicians to predict the risk of occurrence of SCD based on specific covariate profiles of individual patients.
Post-market, prospective, observational, multicenter, non-intervention study, to demonstrate the effectiveness of drug-coated ballon (DCB)therapy in real-world patients with small native vessel coronary artery disease, and to demonstrate the safety of short dual antiplatelet therapy (7 days) in high-bleeding risk patients with native small vessel coronary artery disease treated with DCB therapy. A percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DCB will be performed in patients with native vessel coronary artery disease based on the criterion of the treating physician.
We compared the cardioprotective effects of empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, with those of vildagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, focusing on various inflammatory biomarkers lipid profile, and cardiac function, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
In this study, the primary aim is to compare the impact of using a double-lumen tube and bronchial blocker for single-lung ventilation in patients undergoing minimal invasive cardiac surgeries on postoperative pulmonary functions. Secondary objectives include the comparison of application duration, success in lung collapse, and the number of repositioning attempts for both techniques.
The goal of this observational study is to learn about cardiac biomarker release following exercise in amateur athletes. The main questions it aims to answer are: Question 1: What are the reference values for exercise-induced cardiac troponin elevations following walking, cycling and running exercise? Hypothesis 1: We hypothesize that the exercise-induced cTn release is different following walking, cycling and running exercise. Therefore, we will establish reference values for post-exercise cTn concentrations across each of these sport types. Question 2: Is the prevalence of (subclinical) coronary artery disease higher in individuals with high post-exercise cardiac troponin concentrations in comparison to individuals with low post-exercise cardiac troponin concentrations? Hypothesis 2: We hypothesize that athletes with the highest post-exercise cTn concentrations have a higher prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis compared to athletes matched for sex and age with the lowest post-exercise cTn concentrations. Question 3: What is the association between post-exercise cardiac troponin concentrations and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality during long-term follow-up? Hypothesis 3: We hypothesize that post-exercise cTn concentrations beyond the 99th percentile are associated with an increased risk for MACE and mortality during follow-up. This study consists of three phases: Phase 1: two or three visits to the study location for (amongst other measurements) blood draws to assess cardiac troponin concentrations Phase 2: CT scan of the heart in 10% of participants to assess the prevalence of (subclinicial) coronary artery disease. Phase 3: longitudinal follow-up to assess the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and mortality during 20-year follow-up. Participants will visit our study centre two, three or four times: Visit 1: baseline measurements including height, weight, body composition and blood pressure will be obtained and a blood sample will be drawn. Visit 2: a blood sample will be drawn and activity data will be obtained from participants' own sports watch or bike computer. Optional visit 3: a blood sample will be drawn. Visit 4: 10% of participants will undergo a cardiac CT scan to assess the prevalence of (subclinical) coronary artery disease.
The study will include patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation and multivessel CA lesion, who are subject to surgical treatment according to KG data (Syntax Score 23 - 32 points with significant damage to the anterior descending artery and/or trunk of the left coronary artery). The patient should be suitable for both CABG and PCI (confirmed by an X-ray surgeon and a cardiac surgeon). An X-ray surgeon and a cardiac surgeon, within the framework of planning the volume of revascularization, strives for the fullest feasible volume. Complete myocardial revascularization (that is, the desire for the absence of hemodynamically significant coronary arteries after revascularization, with a diameter of > 2.5 mm, that is, residual coronary artery stenosis of no more than 60%). Thus, patients will be randomized into groups in a ratio of 1:1. Each group will need to include 230 patients (a total of 460). In the main group, revascularization will be performed by PCI, in the control group by CABG.
The aim of this observational study is to assess in patients with a documented athero-thrombotic event: coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), peripheral artery disease (PAD): - the level of adherence to guideline recommendations with the assumption to improve the rate of patients at goal for cholesterol levels. - the level of adherence to guideline recommendations and the rate of patients at goal for the other relevant and modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular event recurrence.
Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has been recognized as the first-line diagnostic test for most patients with suspected coronary syndrome, often acting as a gatekeeper for invasive coronary angiography. It is therefore pivotal to understand instances of discrepancies that are encountered in clinical practice. Moreover, most of the literature on this topic relies on obsolete machines or definitions of coronary artery stenosis that cannot be defined as severe. The investigators aim 1) to report the real word data on the performance of last-generation CCTA in identifying obstructive coronary artery disease (also considering different thresholds of stenosis, i.e., moderate or severe) and 2) to identify predictors of discrepancies.