View clinical trials related to Motor Function.
Filter by:In this project, patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) will be characterized by measuring cognitive and motor function and relation to effect of Levodopa. Participants will be patients with Parkinson's Disease and healthy controls. It will be investigated if there is a difference between patients with a good measured Levodopa response and with a poor measured response.
Stroke is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide and is the leading cause of disability. Currently, a large number of novel treatments are emerging with the aim of recovering the highest functionality and quality of life for these patients, including Robot Assisted Therapy (RAT) and functional electrostimulation (FES). The aim of this study is to observe the effect of FES with respect to conventional treatment and RAT for the improvement of motor function of the upper limb. For this purpose, a clinical trial will be carried out in which participants will be divided into two groups, a first group that will receive conventional treatment together with RAT and FES and a second group that will only receive conventional treatment combined with RAT. The hypothesis of the research group is that the group receiving conventional treatment together with RAT and FES will obtain greater improvements in motor function.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of robotic rehabilitation on balance, body control, mobility, spasticity, motor function and depression compared to traditional therapy in individuals with chronic stroke. Patients aged between 40-70 years, who applied to the Private Avrasya Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Clinic, were diagnosed with hemiplegia based on an epicrisis medical board report, were included in the study on a voluntary basis, regardless of gender. After recording the demographic and clinical information of the participants, based on the physician's decision, they were included in 2 groups: conventional treatment combined with robotic rehabilitation (n=20) and conventional treatment only (n=20). While one of the groups received traditional treatment, the other group received robotic walking training in addition to conventional treatment. Traditional treatment includes strengthening, balance, range of motion exercises and gait training applied 3 days a week for 4 weeks. Robot-assisted walking training was planned for 20 minutes, 3 days a week. As assessment methods, number of steps, the 10m Walk Test, Brunnstrom motor staging, Functional Ambulation Classification, Fugl Meyer Rating Scale (lower extremity section), Modified Ashworth Scale, Beck Depression Scale, Tinetti Balance and Gait Test, Postural Assessment Scale in Stroke Patients and Stroke Impact Scale were used. Gender, age and duration of illness showed homogeneous distribution between the groups.
It's a single-center, prospective, open label clinical study with a 12 months follow-up period, to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on motor function and gait in patients with pure Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive method of modulating brain activity and has therapeutic potential in many neurological and psychiatric conditions. However, unlike every current FDA-approved form of brain stimulation, there is no method of individualizing stimulation dose. In this study, a method of individualizing tDCS dose on behavioral outcomes and whether this could help to improve the consistency and magnitude of the stimulation effects will be tested.
We propose to enhance the effects of brain plasticity using a powerful noninvasive technique for brain modulation consisting of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) priming with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in combination with motor-training-like constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT).
This study is a postmarketing requirement jointly carried out by four NDA holders (Bayer AG, Bracco, GE Healthcare and Guerbet) and the CRO IQVIA. The study aims to create detailed images of the organs and tissue of the human body during x-ray, CT-scan or MRI investigations, doctors are using contrast media (a kind of dye) which can be given to patients by injection into a blood vessel or by mouth. In this study researchers want to find out whether so called gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have an effect on body movement and mental skills when given to participants multiple times within 5 years. The study plans to enroll about 2076 participants suffering from a condition for which they are likely to have at least annually a MRI or another imaging examinations. Only adults up to 65 years will be considered to join this study. During the study duration of 5 years participants will receive annually a MRI or other imaging tests (such as CT-scan, x-ray) and will visit the study doctor at least 7 times for physical examinations, laboratory investigations and tests on body movement and mental skills.
Healthy individuals, after reading and signing the free and informed consent will be submitted to a single session to obtain the normal neurophysiological measures and thus compare with those obtained in individuals with PD. Healthy and post stroke patients will be submitted to a neurophysiological evaluation through transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG). The post stroke patients will also performed the evaluation trought the fugl meyer scale.
Determine the short-term and lasting effects of intensity-matched exercise programs on level 2-3 PD patients' clinical symptoms, postural control, and mobility. Hypothesis 1. The inclusion of a Borg-scale/heart-rate matched active control group will allow us to test the idea that, in addition to a fitness element, the reflexive movements that chellenge PD patients' sensorimotor system will improve patients' clinical symptoms, posture, and mobility more than fitness training and that such lasting effects will be superior in the agility compared with the fitness-control group. This hypothesis emered from the idea that the favorable results in the currently under review paper may be in part due to a simple conditioning effect instead of a specific motor learning effect caused by the xbox training. 2. If feasible, i.e., if there is a lerge enough pool of patients to randomize, a balance training group will be also added to test the idea that the reflexive actions evoked by the agility program by xbox exergaming still produce superior adaptations vs. the balance group because xbox forces patients to rapidly and reflexively execute movements (respond to cues, prompts), while balance training allows patients to stop, go, stop, and go and disrupt the continous execution of linked movements. The disruptions of movement chains could arise from small losses of balance on the unstabel surfaces, need for patients to re-initiate every movement element of a sequence, planning each movement element. It is not clear yet how it woul be possible to match all three intervention groups on Borg/heart rate intensity.
Early stroke rehabilitation is known to be an effective and essential therapy in gaining functional independence and preventing complications. However, there was no consensus of proper amount of motor rehabilitation in stroke patients. In this study, the investigators investigated the effects of the intensive motor rehabilitation during subacute phase to improve motor function at 6 months after onset in patients with first-ever strokes.