Clinical Trials Logo

Malocclusion clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Malocclusion.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04678596 Completed - Tooth Crowding Clinical Trials

Comparison Of Different Orthodontic Aligner Systems Applied On Single Stage And Three Stage

Start date: December 6, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Applying to the Orthodontics Department of the Faculty of Dentistry of Erciyes University for orthodontic treatment, a periodontally healthy 16-26 year-old periodontally healthy, non-congenital or congenital anomaly in the craniofacial region; 25 patients with class 1 orthodontic malocclusion with moderate permeability will be included in the study. The patients will be divided into 2 groups, and the first group of 12 patients will have single-stage aligner; The second group of 13 patients is planned to apply 3-stage aligner.

NCT ID: NCT04670211 Not yet recruiting - Malocclusion Clinical Trials

Observational Comparison of Tooth-borne, Bone-borne and Hybrid Distraction Following SARPE.

SARPE
Start date: May 1, 2021
Phase:
Study type: Observational [Patient Registry]

The investigators will perform a prospective, non-randomized observational study. The aim of this study is to evaluate stability of tooth-borne, bone-borne and hybrid expansion following SARPE by using data collected according to the existing SARPE follow-up protocol. The insights of this study might elucidate the preferred expansion technique and improve surgical technique.

NCT ID: NCT04631419 Completed - Dental Malocclusion Clinical Trials

Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Canine Retraction

Start date: June 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study is conducted to evaluate the effects of flapless laser corticotomy on the rate of canine retraction.

NCT ID: NCT04628390 Not yet recruiting - Malocclusion Clinical Trials

Laser Therapy on Controlling Pain During Orthondontic Treatment

Start date: November 20, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the effectiveness of pain reduction on a initial orthodontic treatment by using 810nm Diode laser compared to a placebo. Methods: This study will include two parallels groups, 30 adult patients each (mean age 18 - 40) that will be asked to fill a questionnaire related with pain before starting orthodontic treatment with Tip edge technique. Patients from one of the groups will receive laser therapy on both upper and lower maxillary according to the protocol. The patients from the other group will receive a placebo simulating a laser therapy on both maxillary. After the process, both groups will be checked on different times (12hrs-24hrs-48hrs-72hrs after) by filling a questionnaire related with pain each time.

NCT ID: NCT04619446 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Dentoskeletal Changes Produced by Growth Modification Appliances in Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion

Start date: September 12, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

To compare dentoskeletal changes in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion induced due to treatment with orthodontic appliances; removable twin block appliance and fixed AdvanSync2 appliance in two different age group patients.

NCT ID: NCT04591080 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Malocclusion, Angle Class I

A Comparison Between GUMMETAL and SS Orthodontic Wires in Space Closure

Start date: February 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

When there is space present between our teeth orthodontically we have the ability to close them through many methods. Using braces as our treatment modality this study will be investigating how efficient a new orthodontic wire is in closing tooth space. This new material is trade-named GUMMETAL and claims to have many benefits to treating patients orthodontically. We will be exploring its efficiency in space closure compared to an industry standard (stainless steel). We predict that the stainless-steel orthodontic wire will be more efficient at space closure than the new GUMMETAL wires.

NCT ID: NCT04556448 Completed - Clinical trials for Malocclusion, Angle Class II

RCT Comparing Invisalign and Traditional Orthodontic Treatment

Start date: January 1, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Comparison of orthodontic patients treated with aligners and traditional (clear braces)

NCT ID: NCT04529057 Completed - Clinical trials for Posterior Crossbite, Upper Airway

Evaluation of the Effect of Different Rapid Maxillary Expansion Appliances on Airway by Acoustic Rhinometry

Start date: July 1, 2016
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) is an orthodontic treatment based on the principle of opening the midpalatal suture with the effect of orthopedic forces. The aim of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate and compare the effects of tooth-borne, tooth-tissue borne, and bone-borne rapid maxillary expanders on nasal airway by using AR. The null hypothesis was that there is no difference for the effect on nasal airway between the appliances.

NCT ID: NCT04518865 Completed - Clinical trials for Class II Malocclusion, Division 1

Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal Periods

Start date: October 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study was directed to compare the treatment outcomes of subjects with Class II malocclusion who were treated with Herbst appliance before and after puberty.

NCT ID: NCT04508322 Active, not recruiting - Quality of Life Clinical Trials

Treatment of Class II Malocclusion With Excessive Overjet

Start date: December 5, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet is one of the most common malocclusions among children and adolescents. The overall goal of the project is to analyze orthodontic treatment of Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet when the treatment is started in different ages and treated with removable and/or fixed appliance. Treatment initiated before the age of eleven is performed with a removable functional appliance, Headgear Activator (HGA). Treatment starting in early adolescence is performed with fixed orthodontic appliance (FA). The hypotheses are: - Treatment with HGA at the age of nine or eleven is effective. No spontaneous correction of the malocclusion is expected in the untreated control group. - Patient experience, treatment effect and cost-effectiveness are equivalent whether the treatment with HGA is initiated at the age of nine or eleven. - Treatment results, patient experience and treatment- and cost-effectiveness are equivalent whether treatment is initiated early with HGA or initiated in early adolescence with FA. - The treatment of Class II malocclusion with excessive overjet renders long-term treatment stability and patient satisfaction.