View clinical trials related to Malocclusion.
Filter by:Rapid maxillary expansion and quad-helix are two well established appliances in dentistry used for posterior cross bite treatment. This study aims to compare this two different appliances in patients in their early mixed dentition, regarding treatment effects of the extra oral soft tissue but also dental and skeletal effects, if the children experience any pain and discomfort during treatment and the study also aims to make a cost minimization analysis. Comparison of these different treatments are barely made and no randomized controlled trial is yet published. No study has evaluated the difference of subjective experience during these two treatments. After this study we will know which one of these two appliances are the most effective, regarding cost minimization and treatment result but we are also able to put it in relation to the patients subjective experience
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of preoperative parameters on surgical results in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery.
Ten adolescent female patients with Class 2 mandibular deficiency with a mean age of 16.5 ±1.71 years treated with type IV Herbst appliance. Skeletally anchored appliance was connected directly to the mandible by a bilateral reconstruction bone plates to provide a skeletal anchorage, while connected to the maxilla through dental splint connecting upper canine, first premolar, first and second molars through the use of orthodontic bands connected together palatally by a heavy 1mm stainless steel wire. The treatment duration was 9 months, then the appliances were removed,The Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans were taken before and immediately after Herbst treatment to analyse airway volume, also 3D measurement of the effective mandibular length has been taken. Cephalometric film was extracted from CBCT scans and analysed for dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes.
The present prospective clinical study was directed to evaluate the efficiency of three different aligning archwires during initial orthodontic leveling.
The aim of this randomized controlled trail is to compare the efficacy of an intraoral device (the Carriere® Motion 3D™ Class III Appliance) with the facial mask for the early treatemnt of Class III malocclusion. This is a monocentric, parallel, controlled trial with blinded examiner.
The aim of the present clinical study was directed to evaluate the effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of canine retraction; in addition, the potential risk for root resorption during maxillary canine retraction.
The aim of this study was to determine whether orthodontically moved maxillary canines exposed to two different protocols and dosage of LLLT exhibited differences in amount and rate of orthodontic tooth movement.
to evaluate effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on mandibular condylar volume and position after treatment of Class II malocclusion with Twin Block (TB) functional therapy via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: Twenty eight growing patients, 14 boys and 14 girls ranged in age 9-12 years, were randomly divided into control group (mean initial age 10.64±1.36 years) and laser group (mean initial age 10.55 1.45 years). All patients treated with TB appliance where Gallium aluminum arsenide diode laser applied in one group weekly around TMJ region for 12 sessions in three months with set parameters: continuous 635 nm, 50 mW, 4.5J/cm2, 45 seconds/ point, total dose per side 11.25J. CBCT were obtained before and immediately after TB therapy, in addition to routine orthodontic records. Changes in TMJ and skeletal variables were analyzed and compared within and between both groups.
to evaluate the outcome of LLLT regarding leveling and alignment of the mandibular anterior segment.
The objective of this randomized controlled study will be to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of maxillary protraction with a facemask, associated with MARPE and Class III elastics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) with maxillary retrusion, compared to HYRAX type maxillary expanders. The investigators will examine differences in treatment times, along with skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes.