View clinical trials related to Malocclusion.
Filter by:The present study will be a single-center, split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial. Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with Invisalign aligners will be enrolled after signing the informed consent. Two different flowable composite resins will be evaluated for the performing of attachments using a split-mouth design: - group A: Filtek Supreme Flow (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) - group B: Grandioso Heavy Flow (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven Germany) Digital impressions with iTero intraoral scanner will be performed; digital impressions will be performed after 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2) from the baseline. Digital scans will be used to assess any changes in shape and volume of the attachments per each different time frame. Each tooth will be separated from the others and superimpositions of the single tooth will be performed with ZEISS Inspect software. After attachments placement, the clinicians will be asked to answer, on a scale from 1 to 10, to this questionnaire's questions about the two different flowable composites; each question is repeated for each composite resin. Type of brushing (with manual or electric toothbrush) and hand of brushing will be recorded.
The present study will be performed to Evaluate the treatment outcome of anterior open bite by temporary anchorage device on buccal and palatal mini screws
It is very important to decrease the bleeding during bimaxillary osteotomy in order to increase the visibility of the surgical site. Our primary goal is to investigate the predictive value of pre- and perioperative factors, including controlled hypotension, on visibility of surgical site during bimaxillary osteotomy.
The aim of this study is to compare the treatment results when treating Class II division 1 malocclusion using the Van Beek-Headgear Activator combination (vBHGA) appliance versus using the Andresen activator.
the PowerScope appliance is found to be efficient for the treatment of class II malocclusion. Accordingly, it appears valuable to investigate the efficiency of skeletally anchored powerScope in the treatment of class III malocclusion
this study was to compare the changes in arch parameters after molar distalization; hybrid hyrax distalizer versus Pendulum distalizer using CBCT.
The aim of this study is to assess if there are significant differences in periodontal conditions between patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment with stainless steel or ceramic brackets. For this study, patients will be enrolled and divided into two groups, according to the type of brackets (stainless steel or ceramic) used for orthodontic treatment. A professional supragingival and subgingival oral hygiene will be performed before the bonding of the orthodontic brackets together with a periodontal evaluation will be recording the following periodontal indices: PPD, BoP, BS, GI, PI, BEWE and Schiff Air Index. Indices will be recorded after 1, 3 and 6 months after the bonding, separately for both in maxillary and in mandibular dental arches and only for teeth with brackets bonded.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of adding elastics to orthodontic retainers on the stability of class III correction and whether it reduces the need for jaw surgery.
The Astra Tech Osseospeed Profile Implant design when placed in the healed extraction site maintains the marginal bone level