Early Improvement in Individual Symptoms and Response to Antidepressants in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02934035
• Other study ID #: 1575
• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: October 13, 2016
• Last updated: October 14, 2016
• Start date: September 2016
• Est. completion date: September 2017

Study information

• Verified date: October 2016
• Source: University Medical Center Groningen
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC)
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects around 7% of the population yearly. Although effective treatments are available, only around half of all patients participating in clinical trials respond to 6 to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment. Given these high failure rates, the ability to predict as early as possible whether a patient is (un)likely to respond would be of great value, as it would enable physicians to change treatment strategies faster.

Early improvement has consistently been found to be a strong predictor of later response. However, misclassification is still quite common, with perhaps a third of those who do not show early improvement going on to respond. Conversely, a substantial proportion of those who do show early improvement do not go on to respond. One possibility for improving the predictive power of early improvement is to examine individual symptoms, rather than the total score on a depression rating scale. Some items, for example, could reflect antidepressant side effects (e.g. gastrointestinal symptoms) and may not be very predictive.

The proposed project aims to examine the relationship between early improvement in individual symptoms and response to antidepressants in a very large patient sample. This large sample size makes it possible to use more rigorous methods than previous studies, such as the use of cross-validation to confirm the findings. It also makes it possible to examine a large set of predictors, including possible interactions among early-improving symptoms and between symptoms and demographic factors like age and gender. The added value of individual symptoms over and above using the total symptom score alone will also be examined, as well as possible differences between different antidepressant classes.

The project will use penalized (lasso) regression, which is well-suited to analyzing data with a large number of (potentially highly correlated) predictors. In the primary analysis, response after 6 weeks of treatment will be predicted. In secondary analyses, remission at week 6 and response and remission at week 12 will also be predicted.

Description:

Study design

The proposed project is an individual patient data meta-analysis. Data will be collated from 31 trials of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of major depressive disorder, using data from trial arms treated with placebo or Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antidepressants. These trials include a total of approximately 7,800 antidepressant-treated and 3,000 placebo-treated participants. Penalized regression methods (specifically least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, 'lasso') will be used to examine the relationship between early improvement in specific depressive symptoms and response to treatment. Furthermore, the investigators will examine whether interactions among early-improving symptoms and between early-improving symptoms and demographic variables such as age and gender improve the prediction of treatment outcome. Finally, the investigators will also examine whether the prediction of response to treatment by early improvement in specific symptoms is dependent upon the type of treatment provided (placebo, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs] or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs]), which would suggest a drug-specific mechanism.

Statistical Analysis Plan

Missing data: A complete cases approach will be taken, as it is of interest to predict response and remission in participants who have actually taken an antidepressant for the specified period of time. Therefore, only participants who have valid baseline, week 2 and week 6 (±1) HDRS scores will be selected for the main analyses (or valid week 12 data for the secondary analyses of week 12 outcomes).

Training and validation sample: The data will be randomly divided into an 80% training sample and a 20% validation sample (stratified by treatment group). Model discovery will be done in the training sample, while the predictive performance of the models will be assessed in the validation sample.

Predictors: Improvement in individual symptoms will be derived from the HDRS items at baseline and week 2. The answer choices for these items range from 0 - 2 for 7 items and 0 - 4 for 10 items. Early improvement will be dichotomized into "no improvement" and "improvement". "No improvement" is indicated by worsening of the item score (e.g. from 1 at baseline to 2 at week 2) or no change in the item score. "Improvement" is indicated by an improvement in the item score of ≥1. Cross-tables will be used to check whether any variables are very highly correlated and if so, one of the items will be removed. Baseline scores on the HDRS items will also be included in the model in order to investigate the added value of improvement of individual items over and above the baseline item scores.

For the total HDRS-17 score, early improvement will also be dichotomized into no/minor improvement (<20% improvement) or improvement (≥20% improvement). The baseline HDRS-17 score will be standardized and included in the model as a covariate.

With regard to the demographic factors, gender is already a dichotomous variable and age will be standardized.

Lasso regression: Lasso regression will be applied to the following models:

Primary analysis (in the antidepressant-treated group only)

1. A model containing variables for early improvement at week 2 in all 17 HDRS items, age, gender, and all two-way interactions between these variables; baseline HDRS item scores; and additionally total HDRS score at baseline and early improvement (≥20% improvement in score) in total HDRS score at week 2.

Exploratory analysis (in all participants, including those treated with placebo)

2. As model 1 above, but including treatment group (placebo, SSRI, SNRI) and all two- and three-way interactions with treatment group.

The tuning parameter (lambda) resulting in minimal prediction error (based on deviance) will be selected with the help of 10-fold cross-validation. The GLMMLasso package for multilevel data will be used to fit the lasso model, which will subsequently be refit with mixed-effects logistic regression using only the variables selected by lasso regression.

Model performance: Prediction accuracy will be assessed by applying the mixed-effects logistic regression model to the independent validation sample. The area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve in predicting response/remission at 6 or 12 weeks will be used to assess prediction accuracy. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (percentage of correct predictions) will also be determined.

Secondary analyses: Secondary analyses will examine 12-week outcomes within the subgroup of trials with a double-blind treatment duration of at least 12 weeks.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Enrollment: 10000
• Est. completion date: September 2017
• Est. primary completion date: September 2017
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Minimum duration of double-blind treatment of 6 weeks

• Participants must have a valid baseline, 2-week and 6 (±1)- or 12 (±1)-week Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score

• Aged 18 years or older

• Participants must have been assigned to either placebo or to an FDA-approved antidepressant

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inclusion criteria of the trial specify a specific subtype of MDD (e.g. MDD and anxiety; MDD and pain)

Study Design

Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Depression
• Depressive Disorder
• Depressive Disorder, Major
• Major Depressive Disorder

Intervention

Drug:
• Antidepressant

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University Medical Center Groningen

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Response	Response is defined as a change of >=50% on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) from baseline to week 6 (±1) of the trial.	Week 6	No
Secondary	Remission	Remission is defined as attaining a score of <=7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) at week 6 (±1).	Week 6	No
Secondary	Response	Response is defined as a change of >=50% on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS, 17-item version) from baseline to week 12 (±1) of the trial.	Week 12	No
Secondary	Remission	Remission is defined as attaining a score of <=7 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) at week 12 (±1).	Week 12	No