Efficacy Study of Vortioxetine on Cognitive Dysfunction in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Major Depressive Disorder Clinical Trial

— FOCUS  

Official title:

Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Fixed Dose Study on the Efficacy of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004 on Cognitive Dysfunction in Adult Patients With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01422213
• Other study ID #: 14122A
• Secondary ID: 2011-001572-19
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: August 22, 2011
• Last updated: July 8, 2014
• Start date: December 2011

Study information

• Verified date: July 2014
• Source: H. Lundbeck A/S
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods AdministrationCanada: Health CanadaFinland: Finnish Medicines AgencyFrance: Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santéGermany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical DevicesLatvia: State Agency of MedicinesMexico: Ministry of HealthSerbia: Medicines and Medical Devices AgencySlovakia: State Institute for Drug ControlSouth Africa: Medicines Control CouncilUkraine: Ministry of HealthUnited States: Food and Drug Administration
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe and common psychiatric disorder. Although MDD primarily involves mood disturbances, patients also usually present alterations in cognitive function (attention, memory, executive functioning and psychomotor speed). Even though antidepressants are suggested in the literature to potentially improve cognitive dysfunction in patients with MDD to some degree, there is a lack of adequate and well-controlled studies to investigate this effect. This study will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a new antidepressant Vortioxetine versus placebo on cognitive dysfunction in adult patients with MDD.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 598
• Est. primary completion date: May 2013
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 65 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• The patient is an inpatient in a psychiatric hospital or an outpatient at a psychiatric setting at the time of the study entry.

• The patient is diagnosed with recurrent MDD according to DSM-IV-TR™ criteria (classification code 296.3x). The current Major Depressive Episode (MDE) should be confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).

• The patient has received prescribed treatment for a previous episode of depression.

• The patient has a MADRS total score =26.

• The reported duration of the current MDE is at least 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

• The patient has a score =70 on the DSST (number of correct symbols), or =42 on the RAVLT (learning) or =14 on the RAVLT (memory) at the Baseline Visit.

• The patient has any current Axis I disorder (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria) other than MDD, confirmed using the MINI.

• The patient has a current diagnosis or history of manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features.

• The patient suffers from personality disorders, mental retardation, pervasive development disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).

• The patient has physical, cognitive, or language impairment of such severity as to adversely affect the validity of the data derived from the neuropsychological tests.

• The patient is diagnosed with reading disability (dyslexia).

• The patient is at significant risk of suicide or has a score =5 on Item 10 (suicidal thoughts) of the MADRS, or has attempted suicide <6 months prior to the Screening Visit.

• The patient has received electroconvulsive therapy <6 months prior to the Screening Visit.

• The current depressive symptoms are considered by the investigator to have been resistant to 2 adequate antidepressant treatments of at least 6 weeks duration each at the recommended dose.

• The patient has a history of moderate or severe head trauma (for example, loss of consciousness for more than 1 hour) or other neurological disorders or systemic medical diseases that are, in the opinion of the investigator, likely to affect central nervous system functioning.

• The patient has a history of cancer, other than basal cell or Stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in remission for >5 years prior to the first drug dose.

• The patient has a clinically significant unstable illness, for example:

• cardiovascular disease

• seizure disorder or encephalopathy

• congestive heart failure

• cardiac hypertrophy

• arrhythmia

• bradycardia (pulse <50 bpm)

• respiratory disease

• hepatic impairment or renal insufficiency

• metabolic disorder

• endocrinological disorder

• gastrointestinal disorder

• haematological disorder

• infectious disorder

• any clinically significant immunological condition

• dermatological disorder

• venereal disease

• The patient has, at the Screening Visit, an abnormal ECG that is, in the investigator's opinion, clinically significant.

• The patient is, in the investigator's opinion, unlikely to comply with the protocol or is unsuitable for any reason.

• The patient has previously been exposed to Vortioxetine.

Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Cognition Disorders
• Depression
• Depressive Disorder
• Depressive Disorder, Major
• Major Depressive Disorder

Intervention

Drug:
• Placebo
capsules; daily; orally
• Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)
encapsulated tablets; daily; orally
• Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)
encapsulated tablets; daily; orally

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
H. Lundbeck A/S

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in DSST (Number of Correct Symbols) and RAVLT (Acquisition and Delayed Recall) Using the Composite Z-score Defined as the Weighted Sum of the Individual Patient Z-scores	DSST assesses psychomotor speed of performance requiring visual perception, spatial decision-making, and motor skills. It consists of 133 digits and requires the patient to substitute each digit with a simple symbol in a 90-s period. Each correct symbol is counted, and the total score ranges from 0 (< normal functioning) to 133 (> normal functioning).; RAVLT assesses verbal learning and memory, including immediate memory, efficiency of learning, retroactive and proactive interference effects, and encoding versus retrieval. It consists of a number of tasks, including immediate recall and delayed recall. The number of words correctly recalled on each task is recorded.; The scores are standardized by subtracting the overall mean change from baseline from the individual change from baseline and dividing by the standard deviation estimate of the change from baseline. The 2 tests, DSST and RAVLT are each assigned a weight of 0.5, the 2 subtests of RAVLT are each assigned a weight of 0.25.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in DSST (Number of Correct Symbols)	Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is a cognitive test designed to assess psychomotor speed of performance requiring visual perception, spatial decision-making, and motor skills. It consists of 133 digits and requires the patient to substitute each digit with a simple symbol in a 90-second period. Each correct symbol is counted, and the total score ranges from 0 (less than normal functioning) to 133 (greater than normal functioning)." as a description of DSST.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in RAVLT (Acquisition)	Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT) is a cognitive test designed to assess verbal learning and memory, including immediate memory, efficiency of learning, retroactive and proactive interference effects, and encoding versus retrieval. It consists of a number of tasks, including immediate recall and delayed recall. The number of words correctly recalled on each task is recorded.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in RAVLT (Delayed Recall)	Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT) is a cognitive test designed to assess verbal learning and memory, including immediate memory, efficiency of learning, retroactive and proactive interference effects, and encoding versus retrieval. It consists of a number of tasks, including immediate recall and delayed recall. The number of words correctly recalled on each task is recorded.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the TMT A (Speed of Processing)	Trail Making Test (TMT) is a cognitive test designed to assess scanning, visuomotor tracking, executive function, and cognitive flexibility. It consists of two parts, A and B: the patient must draw lines to connect consecutively numbered circles (part A) and then connect consecutively numbered and lettered circles alternating between the two sequences (part B). The time taken to complete the two parts is recorded. Part A assesses cognitive processing speed. The lower the score the faster the processing speed.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the TMT B (Executive Function)	TMT is a cognitive test designed to assess scanning, visuomotor tracking, executive function, and cognitive flexibility. It consists of two parts, A and B: the patient must draw lines to connect consecutively numbered circles (part A) and then connect consecutively numbered and lettered circles alternating between the two sequences (part B). The time taken to complete the two parts is recorded. Part B examines executive functioning and ability to shift cognitive set. The lower the score the faster the ability to shift cognitive set.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Congruent STROOP Time to Complete (Executive Function)	Stroop Colour Naming Test (STROOP) is a cognitive test designed to assess the ability to inhibit a prepotent response to reading words while performing a task that requires attention control. It comprises two sheets with 50 words on each, and each word is the name of a colour. On the first sheet, the Congruent STROOP Sheet, the word and ink colour match; on the Incongruent STROOP Sheet, the word and ink colour do not match. For each sheet, the patient has 4 minutes to name the ink colour of each word. When the patient finishes the sheet, or once 4 minutes is up, the clinician notes the time taken and counts the number of correct and incorrect responses. The scale ranges from 0-100, the higher score the greater the cognitive flexibility.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Incongruent STROOP Time to Complete (Executive Function)		Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the SRT (Speed of Processing)	Simple Reaction Time (SRT) is designed to assess psychomotor speed, and Choice Reaction Time (CRT) is designed to assess visual attention. Two computerised tests, part of the CogState battery were used to measure SRT and CRT in milliseconds: The "detection task" measures SRT: the patient presses a "yes" button, whenever an onscreen playing card is turned over.; The "identification task" measures CRT: the patient presses a "yes" button whenever an onscreen playing card is turned over and is red, or a "no" button if the card is not red.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in the CRT (Attention)		Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in MADRS Total Score	The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 in CGI-S Score	The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The investigator should use his/her total clinical experience with this patient population to judge how mentally ill the patient is at the time of rating.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Clinical Status Using CGI-I Score at Week 8	The Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). The investigator rated the patient's overall improvement relative to baseline, whether or not, in the opinion of the investigator, this was entirely due to the drug treatment.	Week 8	No
Secondary	Proportion of Responders at Week 8 (Response Defined as a >=50% Decrease in the MADRS Total Score From Baseline		Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Proportion of Remitters at Week 8 (Remission is Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)		Week 8	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 1 Using the MADRS Total Score and the Composite Z-score	Effect on cognitive dysfunction after correcting for the effect on depressive symptoms.; The estimation of the effect on cognitive dysfunction after correcting for the effect on depressive symptoms was based on the composite z-score and the MADRS total score. The effect was estimated in an ANCOVA model using the composite z-score at week 1 as dependent variable and the change from baseline to week 1 in the MADRS total score, the baseline MADRS total score, the baseline composite z-score, the treatment group and site as independent variables.; In the week 1 analysis the vortioxetine 10 and 20 mg groups were pooled because patients randomized to vortioxetine 20 mg received vortioxetine 10 mg in the first week of the study.	Baseline and Week 1	No
Secondary	Change From Baseline to Week 8 Using the MADRS Total Score and the Composite Z-score	Effect on cognitive dysfunction after correcting for the effect on depressive symptoms.; The estimation of the effect on cognitive dysfunction after correcting for the effect on depressive symptoms was based on the composite z-score and the MADRS total score. The effect was estimated in an ANCOVA model using the composite z-score at week 1 as dependent variable and the change from baseline to week 1 in the MADRS total score, the baseline MADRS total score, the baseline composite z-score, the treatment group and site as independent variables.	Baseline and Week 8	No
Secondary	Risk of Suicidality Using C-SSRS Scores	The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was developed by researchers at Columbia University as a tool to systematically assess suicidal ideation and behaviour in patients during participation in a clinical study. The C-SSRS is composed of questions that address suicidal behaviour and questions that address suicidal ideation, with subquestions that assess severity. The tool was administered via an interview with the patient.; For 2 patients in each treament group (6 in total) the CSSRS assessments are missing during study.	Up to 8 weeks	Yes