View clinical trials related to Major Depression.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of escitalopram plus PS128 to escitalopram in the acute treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.
Background: The Human Brain Collection Core (HBCC) collects brain and other tissues. They get these from deceased people who may or may not have had psychiatric disorders. The next of kin gives permission for researchers to get the tissues. Researchers want to collect medical details of people whose brains are donated. They also want to use the donated tissue to study brain chemistry and structure. This could lead to better treatments for mental illness. Objective: To create a collection of human brain tissue to learn about the causes and mechanisms of mental disorders. Eligibility: People willing to donate their deceased relative s brain tissue. The deceased person could not have had any of the following: Severe mental retardation Long-lasting seizure disorder Infections that affect the brain Decomposition Brain damage Being on a respirator for more than 12 hours Major sepsis Serious renal or hepatic disease Certain dementias and degenerative diseases Design: Medical Examiner s Offices will screen donors who have recently died. Some others will be screened by hospitals or funeral homes. Participants will be the next of kin. They will give consent for HBCC to obtain brain tissue from the deceased person. The tissue will be frozen for future research. Participants will have a 30-minute phone call. They will answer questions about the deceased person s medical and psychiatric conditions. They will answer questions about the person s use of medicines and drugs. Participants will be contacted by a social worker. They will be asked for permission to access the deceased person s medical records.
The study is a 6-week, proof-of-concept, open trial of vortioxetine for 20 patients with major depressive disorder.
The proposed study will evaluate the response and remission rates for major depressive disorder (MDD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) treated with bupropion or fluoxetine for 12 weeks. In addition, the study will document the relative tolerability and safety, and longitudinally contrast the effects of bupropion and fluoxetine on measures of cognitive function, fatigue, inflammation, and tryptophan (TRP) and TRP catabolites in blood. It is hypothesized that both drugs will significantly reduce MDD symptoms from baseline, and be tolerable and safe, but bupropion will be associated with greater reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines, cognitive impairment, and fatigue compared with fluoxetine. The Specific Aims of this study are: Aim 1: Determine the efficacy of bupropion and fluoxetine in treatment of MDD in ESRD/HD patients. Aim 2: Determine whether longitudinal change in MDD symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and fatigue differ between bupropion and fluoxetine. Aim 3: Determine whether longitudinal change in MDD symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and fatigue correlate with change in inflammation, measures of TRP availability to brain, or neurotoxic TRP metabolites. Hypotheses: 1. Bupropion and fluoxetine will both show efficacy in treating MDD; 2. Bupropion will lead to greater improvement in cognitive dysfunction and fatigue than fluoxetine; and 3. Change in cognition and fatigue over time will correlate with change in c-reactive protein (CRP) and quinolinic acid and change in overall depression score will correlate with measures of TRP availability.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects about 5% of adolescents and is on the rise both internationally and in Norway. Further, it is also associated with increased risk for suicide. Not surprisingly, depression is the largest reason for referral to specialty mental health services for adolescents (13-17 years) in Norway. Although anti-depressants and Cognitive behavioral therapy are strong treatments and have received extensive research, the best treatments show a recovery rate of only 37 %. There is a need to develop and test alternative treatments that can stand alone or augment anti-depressant medication. Family factors play an important role in the etiology, maintenance and relapse of depression. A promising family-based treatment (Attachment based family therapy- ABFT) was imported to Norway and its feasibility tested in a pilot randomized clinical trial with 20 families. The results showed promising treatment outcomes. Although the developers of the model have refined, adapted the model to suicidal ideation and built strong technology to support dissemination, a definitive study of ABFT for adolescents with major depression has not yet been conducted. Therefore the primary aim of this study is to test if ABFT is more effective that enhanced usual care (EUC) to treat clinic-referred adolescents with major depression. The investigators will test the hypothesis that 12 weeks of ABFT therapy will produce a greater proportion of adolescents report remission from depression and symptom change than 12 weeks of enhanced clinical care (EUC). Secondary research aims are i) to test a hypothesis that parent-adolescent conflict will be more sensitive to change for adolescents receiving ABFT that adolescents receiving EUC ii) to explore patterns of change in suicidal ideation in the recruited sample in the acute-phase treatment. Central challenges to the study are i) blinding therapists/patients, which is difficult in psychotherapy trials ii) lack of a standardized control condition, and iii) selecting and training regular staff therapists to high adherence levels. However, with tighter control over these factors than is normal for a typical effectiveness trial, the investigators expect results to show what to expect under the "best of conditions" in community clinics. Benchmark derived from the study will inform how to effectively train therapists and subsequently implement the model into mainstream services.
To assess the efficacy of Omega 3 Fatty acid (Omega 3 FA) augmentation of desvenlafaxine (DVS) compared to placebo augmentation of DVS when used to treat depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with select medical conditions (cancer, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes).
This study examines whether depression in people with borderline personality disorder is different than depression in people without borderline personality disorder. Unlike people who have depression alone (i.e. without borderline personality disorder), people with borderline personality disorder have depressions that often do not improve with medications. This makes treating depression much more challenging in someone with borderline personality disorder than without borderline personality disorder. Borderline personality disorderis associated with difficulty in understanding and communicating feelings. Impaired emotion processing may reflect dysfunction of an area of the brain, the anterior cingulate. Depression is associated with changes in anterior cingulate activity. The investigators believe that when borderline personality disorder is present with depression, brain activity changes in the anterior cingulate will not be the same as in depressed patients without borderline personality disorder. An electroencephalogram records brain electrical activity. In this study, the investigators will measure electroencephalogram indices reflecting anterior cingulate activity. HYPOTHESIS: In this study, the investigators predict that when borderline personality is present with depression, electroencephalogram indices of anterior cingulate activity will be different from when depression is present alone (without borderline personality). This could help to explain why people with borderline personality have depressions that are harder to treat than depressions in people without borderline personality. The investigators also predict that electroencephalogram indices of the anterior cingulate will reflect emotional processing ability, as measured by validated questionnaires.
The primary objectives of this study are to investigate the potential for ketamine anesthesia to increase the antidepressant efficacy of Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and to decrease acute ECT-induced adverse cognitive effects.
The primary objective will be to pilot the use of escitalopram for the treatment of major depression in patients with epilepsy. The secondary objectives will be to determine effect sizes on scales measuring depressive symptoms, physical symptoms, psychosocial function and quality of life, and to evaluate safety in the population of patients with epilepsy. These results will be used to evaluate the possibility of a future double-blind, placebo controlled RCT of escitalopram for the treatment of major depression in patients with epilepsy.
The hypothesis of this study is that symptoms of anxiety, depression and insomnia; and indices of psychosocial function will all improve, while BZ use will decrease significantly during a twelve-week trial period of substituting quetiapine for benzodiazepines.