View clinical trials related to Lymphedema.
Filter by:This is a double-blind randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of shock wave therapy on lower limb lymphedema. There are two arms: A) complex decongestive therapy + extracorporeal shock waves therapy; B) complex decongestive therapy plus placebo extracorporeal shock waves.
An open-label, multi-center, prospective VA study to evaluate the effectiveness and health economics of a Novel Portable Non-Pneumatic Active Compression Device (NPCD) for lymphedema/phlebolymphedema
The primary objective of the investigators is to develop an integrated algorithm for surgical treatment of chronic lymphedema after breast cancer surgery. This will be achieved by retrospectively analysing a subgroup of patients who had breast cancer-related surgery prior to lymphedema.
This clinical trial is designed to learn more about treating patients with lower limb lymphoedema following gynaecological surgery. The main question to be answered is To evaluate the efficacy of Daphnetin capsule in the treatment of patients with lower limb lymphedema following gynaecological malignancy surgery. Participants will take Daphnetin capsule 150mg tid (3 capsules/time, 3 times daily) orally at the same time as gradient compression stocking treatment. Researchers will compare 150mg Forte tablets (2 capsules/time, 2 times daily) and gradient compression stockings to see if Daphnetin capsule can be used to treat patients with lower extremity lymphedema following gynaecological malignancy surgery.
To examine the efficacy of complex decongestive therapy (CDT), cryotherapy and kinesio taping (KT) in patients with post-mastectomy lymphedema
100 women with karyotype verified TS, previously examined at 4 study visits during a 19-year period will be asked to participate in a 5th study visit. Healthy age-matched females will be included as controls in a ratio 2:1. The aim is to examine and quantify the cardiovascular and lymphatic system in women with TS. The investigators will study a possible causal mechanism between the known pathologic phenotype and alterations in these systems to understand, prevent or treat the life-threatening complications in TS.
Breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) is due to its chronicity and impact an extremely dreaded complication after breast cancer treatment. The prevalence rate of objective arm and trunk/ breast BCRL is declining due to the major shift into the treatment approach of breast cancer. However, the prevalence rate of subjective arm and trunk/ breast BCRL is much higher than that of objective BCRL. Subjective BCRL is defined as the diagnosis of BCRL based on the patient's sensation of a difference in size at the arm and/or trunk without any objectively measurable swelling. At this moment, it is not clear how many breast cancer patients experience subjective arm or trunk/breast BCRL and what the underlying mechanisms may be. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that four mechanisms might be associated with the presence and the severity of subjective arm or trunk/breast BCRL, including sensory processing problems (1. nociceptive and/or 2. neuropathic and/or 3. central) and the presence of disturbed lymphatic transport without clinical manifestation (4. subclinical BCRL). The investigators will set up a prospective longitudinal study with breast cancer patients to determine the prevalence of subjective and objective arm or trunk/ breast BCRL at 1, 6. and 12 month(s) post-surgery and the transitions between the different types of BCRL and to compare the amount of swelling at arm or trunk/ breast, the presence or severity of subclinical BCRL and peripheral and central sensory processing problems between patients with different types of BCRL. In addition, the present study will be undertaken to determine the contributing factors to the severity of subjective arm or trunk/ breast BCRL within the group of patients with subjective BCRL at different time-points after surgery (at 1, 6. and 12 month(s) post-surgery).
In this observational prospective studi patients with invasive breast cancer no more than 5 cm and clinically node negative, scheduled for conservative surgery and Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB), are enrolled in the protocol if they have 1-2 sentinel lymphnodes (SLNs) with macrometastases. SLN status will be checked on definitive sections.
This clinical trial studies how well new adhesive-based sensors that stick to the skin (transcutaneous) work in detecting cancer-related long-term arm swelling (lymphedema). For many patients, lymphedema s painful, unsightly, and weakening. The early signs of lymphedema are hard to see, and sometimes it is only diagnosed by hospital equipment at larger centers. Treating lymphedema early is usually more successful than trying to treat in later stages. The adhesive-based sensors used in this study work by using techniques called photoplethysmography (PPG) and bioimpedance (BI). PPG is an optical technique that can be used to detect blood volume changes in tissue. BI evaluates how tissue responds to an externally applied electrical current. This study may assist researchers in distinguishing participants with lymphedema in comparison to participants without lymphedema, and develop a way for patients to check for lymphedema at home.
This multi-center cohort study focuses on evaluating the efficacy of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) for treating pitting lymphedema in female breast cancer survivors. Conducted across multiple centers in Denmark, including Odense University Hospital, Herlev Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital Vejle, and Zealand University Hospital, it aims to assess LVA's impact on reducing arm volume and improving quality of life in patients with upper extremity lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment. Eligible participants are adult women with unilateral arm lymphedema who show active pitting and identifiable lymphatic vessels via indocyanine green lymphography. Inclusion involves informed consent and the ability to complete Danish questionnaires. Patients are recruited from the outpatient clinics of the participating hospitals and will undergo LVA surgery under either local or general anesthesia. Following the intervention, patients are seen for data collection up to twelve months. The study measures outcomes like arm volume changes through water displacement volumetry and arm circumferential measurements, body composition via bioimpedance, health-related quality of life through LYMPH-Q, general quality of life through SF-36, arm function via DASH, and anastomosis patency via ICG lymphography. Additionally, changes in ICG lymphography images, arm fibrosis via SkinFibroMeter, and surgery duration are evaluated. The study adheres to ethical guidelines, ensuring patient safety and the integrity of the research.