View clinical trials related to Lymphedema.
Filter by:This study evaluates how swelling in the chest following breast cancer treatment may affect patients' quality of life and shoulder function.
The project aims to compare the differences in the expression of cell death through apoptosis and iron-dependent cell death after the reduction of edema symptoms following lymphedema surgery in patients.
Chronic lymphedema in the lower extremities is a common problem found in older adults that can result in cellulitis, poor wound healing, venous stasis ulcers, and other comorbidities. Compressive therapies are the present gold standard for the manual treatment of lymphedema in the lower extremities. However, the benefits of these compressive therapies are modest, and they are not well tolerated by older adults. An alternative manual treatment is the osteopathic pedal pump, an osteopathic manipulative treatment, that uses a rhythmical pumping motion instead of compressive force to move interstitial fluid from the lower extremities back to the circulatory system. However, the evidence that the osteopathic pedal pump can reduce volume in the lower extremities remains anecdotal. The aim of this study is to determine if the osteopathic pedal pump can reduce volume in the lower extremities among older adults with chronic lymphedema. Leg volume will be measured using water displacement. Older adults with chronic lymphedema of the lower extremities will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: a treatment group that will receive one session of the osteopathic pedal pump and a control group that will receive one session of a light touch treatment.
Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive disease of the lymphatic vessels which affects about 300 million people worldwide. Patients may experience recurrent soft tissue infection of the limb affected by lymphedema, in terms of erysipelas, lymphangitis or cellulitis. No previous study has ever investigated the possible role of the gut microbiota in the genesis of acute infectious/inflammatory episodes in these patients. Our hypothesis is that lymphedema patients with recurrent soft tissue infections are characterized by pro-inflammatory changes in the microbiota.
The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) on propriseception, balance and sensation in patients with secondary lymphedema that develops in the lower extremities after cancer surgery.
Type of this study: Prospective randomized controlled study. The aim of our study is to compare patients with lymphedema who have undergone lymphovenous anastomosis surgery receiving Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy (CDP), patients with lymphedema who have not undergone surgery who receive Complex Decongestive Physiotherapy, in terms of Extremity Volume, Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction. 26 volunteers will be included in the study as patients with lymphedema who have undergone lymphovenous anastomosis surgery and KBF (n=13), only KBF (n=13), application groups. How effective is lymphovenous anastomosis surgery and KBF or only CDP acutely in the treatment of lymhedema?
The purpose of this study to test whether a comprehensive program may help the lymph fluid to drain out of the arm and prevent lymphedema in participants with breast cancer.
Sixty eight female patients who had symptoms of carpal tunnel syndromesuch as wrist pain or numbness and paraesthesia and had lymphedema of an upper extremity.Their ages will be ranged from 40 to 60 years. The participants will be selected from Out Patient clinic of Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University and randomly distributed into two equal groups.Duration of treatment for 4weeks.All subjects signed an informed consent form, and the rights of subjects were protected.
It is estimated that there are 420,000 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in China in 2020. With surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, endocrine, targeted therapy and other treatment methods going hand in hand, the outcome of breast cancer patients has been greatly improved. However, along with the comprehensive treatment of breast cancer, there will also be some corresponding complications, including breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), is one of the most common and serious complications. the incidence of BCRL in the patients with axillary dissection11% -57%, average 28%, Arm lymphedema seriously affect the quality of life of breast cancer patients, is known as the last kilometer of breast cancer patients to return to society. The related risk factors mainly include surgery, radiotherapy, body mass index, (BMI), etc. Accordingly, a series of measures appeared to prevent the occurrence of BCRL, including surgical and non-surgical methods, The main surgical methods include lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA), and axillary reverse mapping to retain arm lymph nodes.the LYMPHA technology requires skilled microsurgery technology, or multidisciplinary participation, which will prolong the operation time.The retention of arm lymph nodes may involve tumor safety.Non-surgical methods include elastic sleeve wearing, functional exercise, arm resistance training, manual drainage, etc. The manual drainage is time-consuming and requires therapist participation, and the evidence that resistance training can prevent edema is insufficient.The elastic cuff has been proven to effectively prevent the occurrence of BCRL, and it can prevent the accumulation of extracellular fluid caused by surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and gravity factors. A randomized controlled study (CTRI / 2017 / 12 / 010762) released by Paramanandam VS et al, Tata Memorial Hospital, tertiary Cancer Center, Mumbai, India, that wearing compression sleeves (20-25mmHg) can reduce and delay the occurrence of arm swelling in the first year after breast cancer surgery. However, the higher pressure sleeves still has a negative impact on patients' quality of life and patient compliance. Ochalek K have shown that the primary pressure sleeves (15-20mmHg) is also effective in preventing the occurrence of lymphedema, but the randomized controlled study has a small sample size and insufficient evidence.
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) with sham surgery for patients suffering from unilateral cancer-related lymphedema in either the upper or lower extremity. It aims to answer whether LVA is more effective than sham surgery in terms of improvement in Lymph-ICF score. A total of 110 participants will be allocated randomly into two groups at a 1:1 ratio. The first group will receive lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA), while the second group will undergo sham surgery.