View clinical trials related to Lung Ultrasound.
Filter by:Evaluation of respiratory function is considered a crucial component in the assessment of patients with a wide range of respiratory diseases. Spirometry is considered a common method of measuring pulmonary function. Recently, Transthoracic ultrasound yields important diagnostic information within minutes. Respiratory muscle ultrasound is used to evaluate the anatomy and function of the respiratory system.
Background: Intraoperative hypotension increases 30-day mortality and the risks of myocardial injury and acute renal failure. Patients with inadequate volume reserve before the induction of anesthesia are highly exposed. The identification of latent hypovolemia is therefore crucial. Ultrasonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) is able to detect volume responsiveness in circulatory shock and growing evidence support the theory that higher IVCCI can predict intraoperative hypotension. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the potential benefit of an ultrasound-based protocol for preoperative fluid optimization. The investigators will perform a randomized-controlled study involving elective surgical patients. An ultrasound-based protocol (USP) arm and a conventional fluid therapy group (CFT) are to be formed. Ultrasound examinations will be performed twice in both groups: 2 hours and 30 minutes preoperatively. The inferior vena cava and the anterior lung fields will be scanned. In the USP group the participants will receive fluid therapy according to the ultrasonographic findings: high level of IVCCI and absence of signs of pulmonary edema will indicate fluid therapy. In the CFT group the attending anesthesiologist (blinded to the results of ultrasonography) will order fluid therapy on the basis of daily routine and clinical judgement. The investigators will evaluate the incidence of intraoperative hypotension (primary outcome), postoperative metabolic status and organ functions and the amount of the administered intravenous fluids in both groups.
Determination of the hemodialysis ultrafiltration volume is guided by the clinician's estimate of dry weight. A poor estimate of this dry weight may result in insufficient fluid depletion causing a state of volume overload, which may be associated with long-term left ventricular failure, high blood pressure and excess of mortality. The diagnosis of fluid overload in haemodialysis patient is routinely based on clinical examination which consists of cardiopulmonary auscultation and edema palpation of limb member. Clinical examination can be completed by paraclinical examinations, and bioimpedance is an objective tool that assess fluid overload state. This test provides an individualized hydration status and fluid overload based on normal extracellular volume considering body composition. Echocardiography allows an accurate assessment of blood volume status by simultaneous studying left ventricular filling pressures, systolic pulmonary artery pressure and the diameter of the inferior vena cava. Lung ultrasound analyses the B-lines defined as artefactual images resulting from contact between air in "alveoli" and water in "septa". It can estimate pulmonary congestion. The aim of the study is to evaluate the lung ultrasound using "8 sites" score accuracy for estimating fluid overload of patients before hemodialysis session.
Background：About 50% of subclinical heart failure (Sub-HF) patients might have residual lung ultrasound B-lines (LUS-BL). Sub-HF is insensitive to widely used imaging examinations, like x-ray or echocardiography, but lung ultrasound (LUS) can sufficiently detect pulmonary congestion in Sub-HF patients. Previous studies showed that residual LUS-BL is associated worse clinical outcome among patients with chronic heart failure. In this trial, we sought to evaluate the impact of LUS-BL guided intensive HF management post discharge in patients with residual LUS-BL on outcome up to 1 year after discharge. Aim: IMP-OUTCOME is a prospective, single-center, observational cohort study, which is designed to investigate whether LUS-BL-guided intensive HF management post discharge might improve the outcome of HF patients with residual B-lines at discharge up to 1 year after discharge. Methods and results: After receiving the standardized treatment of HF according to current guidelines, 320 HF patients with ≥ 3 B-lines (LUS-BL, assessed within 48 hours before discharge) will be divided into the conventional HF management group and the LUS-BL-guided intensive HF management group at 1:1 ratio. LUS-BL-guided intensive HF management group will receive optimized HF medication according to current guidelines and medication will be adjusted according the status of LUS-BL in addition to symptom and physical examination results during the follow-up at 2-month interval. Patient-related clinical data including sex, age, blood chemistry, imaging examination, drug utilization, and so on will be obtained and analyzed. Following discharge from the hospital, patients in the conventional HF management group will receive optimized HF medication according to current guidelines and medication will be adjusted without knowing the status of LU-BL during the follow-up at 2-month interval. LUS-BL will be assessed at 2-month interval post discharge in both groups, results will be transferred to HF nurses, who will decide to present the LUS-BL results to managing cardiologist or envelope the LUS-BL results till study end according to group assignment. Echocardiography examination will be performed at 12 months for all patients and EF, E/e', LA size and systolic pulmonary artery pressure will be assessed. The primary endpoint is the composite of re-hospitalization for worsening HF and all-cause death during follow-up. Secondary endpoints include the change in the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and NT-pro BNP, arrythmia and 6-minutes walk distance at each follow up, EF and B-lines changes at final follow up. Safety profile will be noted and analyzed. Primary results will be available by early 2024. Conclusion: This trial will clarify the impact of LUS-BL guided intensive HF management on outcome for discharged patients with residual B-lines up to 1 year after discharge in the era of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor.
1. Introduction and aims: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the gold standard for the treatment of elderly patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS). AS causes left ventricular remodeling as well as left atrial enlargement, pulmonary artery and right ventricular changes, these changes, and whether they are reversible (reverse remodeling) are major determinants of outcome after TAVR. Heart Failure (HF) is the most frequent cause of cardiac re-hospitalization after TAVR. Most HF exacerbations are related to a progressive rise in cardiac filling pressures that precipitates pulmonary congestion and symptomatic decompensation. Traditionally, pulmonary congestion has been assessed by physical examination and chest radiography but clinical signs and symptoms of congestion are poor surrogates for ventricular filling pressures and are not reliable predictors of imminent hospitalization. Recently, lung ultrasonography (LUS) has been identified as a sensitive and semi-quantitative tool for the assessment of pulmonary congestion in HF. The technique is based on the detection of vertical echogenic artifacts arising from the pleural line, named "B-lines". The number of B-lines is associated with increased risk of adverse events during hospitalization and after hospital discharge. CLUSTER-HF Trial demonstrated that the routine incorporation of LUS during clinical follow-up of patients with recent acute decompensated HF without a surgically correctable cause, was associated with a risk reduction of adverse HF events, mainly urgent HF visits. Thus, LUS could represent a promising tool to detect pulmonary congestion related to AS. To date, there are no studies on the role of LUS in the context of AS and TAVR. The study hypothesis is that in patients with higher number of B-lines before-TAVR and after TAVR, the rate of adverse events during follow-up is higher. 2. Study design: This is a single center prospective study carried out at Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Roma and involving patients with severe aortic stenosis submitted to TAVR treatment. The expected recruitment period is approximately one year For patients fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria, all data about clinical status leading to TAVR, exams and any specific documentation during hospitalization will be collected. 3. Number of patients: For the primary end-point, a sample-size of 91 is computed using the one-sample chi-square test and assuming a proportion of LUS-evaluated pulmonary congested patients before TAVR of 50% and a proportion of 35% of LUS-evaluated pulmonary congested patients after TAVR. To accommodate for possible missing investigations, sample size will be increased to 105 patients. The secondary end-point is the association between pre-TAVR and post-TAVR B-lines and long-term outcomes. Based on previous studies, the investigators know that the incidence of rehospitalization for heart failure during one-year after TAVR is 14% and that patients suffering from heart failure without LUS-evaluated pulmonary congestion are at very low risk of heart failure rehospitalization during follow-up. So, for sample size calculation of the secondary endpoint, the investigators estimated a cumulative incidence higher in the LUS- evaluated pulmonary congestion group with more than 16 B-lines on all scanning sites (30% of events during 1-year of follow-up) with a lower incidence of 8% in the remaining patients. With an HR of 5 favoring patients wit less than 15 B-Lines on all scanning, and aiming to a 2-sided alpha level of 0.05 and a power of 80% the investigators estimated 144 patients. To accommodate for possible missing investigations, sample size will be increased to 150 patients. 4. In-hospital study schedule: For each patient, the investigators will obtain from our general hospital database the following clinical data: - Demographic and clinical data documentation; - Clinical examination: before TAVR, before discharge and when adverse events occur; - Blood analysis; - TAVR procedural characteristics and complications. 5. Instrumental diagnostic exams (Echocardiography and lung ultrasound): Each patient will be evaluated before and after TAVR with a comprehensive echocardiogram and LUS for the evaluation of the pulmonary congestion. All the evaluations will be performed the day before TAVR and after TAVR. In consideration of the operator's dependence on ultrasound methods to reduce the error rate, all examinations will be performed by qualified personnel. 6. Clinical follow up assessment: Clinical follow up information will be obtained from: visits, review of the patient's hospital record, personal communication with the patient's physician and review of the patient's chart, a telephone interview with the patient conducted by trained medical personnel The following information will be recorded: clinical status assessment, adverse event assessment, record cardiac medications.
Lung ultrasonography (LUS) is also used in COVID 19 pneumonia for diagnostic and follow-up purposes.It has been demonstrated in different studies that it can be used for pathologies in pleural and lung tissue. LUS was applied by different researchers by dividing the lungs into 12 and 14 regions and the results were shared.
Lung ultrasonography has been used for diagnosis and treatment in many departments including intensive care before the pandemic. The gold standard method for the diagnosis of pneumonia is still chest tomography. Ultrasonography, which has advantages over tomography, has also been tried to be used in covid 19 pneumonia.
Covid-19 (English acronym meaning coronavirus disease 2019) is an emerging infectious disease caused by a strain of coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2. The current pandemic has resulted in a significant number of admissions in the emergency room (ER) due to suspicion of COVID-19 infection. Use of lung ultrasound is standard practice to diagnose acute respiratory failure in ER. Recently, typical lung ultrasonographic characteristics of COVID-19 disease has been described. The investigators demonstrated that the association of 4 signs in pulmonary ultrasound associated with a clinical sign (COVILUS score) could predict the occurrence of a positive RT-PCR in patients suspected of COVID-19 infection admitted to the emergency room. The investigators are going to conduct a new study to validate this COVILUS score in this type of patient. The main objective will be to validate the diagnostic performance of lung ultrasound in patients admitted to the emergency room with suspected COVID19 infection.
We aim to identify the diagnostic role of a lung ultrasonography (LUS) score to predict the severity and the need for surfactant therapy in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and to compare it with a chest X-ray score.
The QUICK study main aim is to assess the predictive value at Day 1, of a model built on lung ultrasound (LUS) and clinical data, both recorded at hospital admission of COVID-19 patients.