View clinical trials related to Liver Neoplasms.
Filter by:Comprehensive preoperative planning and real-time intraoperative guidance are essential prerequisites for achieving precise liver resection. In pursuit of this goal, the investigators have developed innovative 3D printed liver models utilizing a physically crosslinked self-healing elastomer created through the copolymerization of 4-acryloylmorpholine (ACMO) and methoxy poly (ethylene glycol) acrylate (mPEGA). These printed models exhibit exceptional healing capabilities, efficiently restoring their structure within minutes at room temperature, and rapidly recovering within moments after being incised. Herein, the investigators aim to assess the viability of employing these 3D printed liver models as instrumental tools in designing the optimal surgical approach through an iterative trial-and-error methodology. Concurrently, the investigators aim to determine whether the integration of these 3D printed models into conventional methods (contrast-enhanced CT or MRI) can enhance the safety, ease, and efficiency of hepatic resection procedures.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation is a commonly treatment for patients with liver cancer that cannot be surgically resected. During the procedure, patients need to keep awake and cooperate with the procedure, including deep breath and hold breath. However, intolerable pain generated during puncture and radiofrequency heating may cause body movements and interfere the procedure. Oxycodone is frequently used for analgesia but still insufficient. A recent study showed that dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination improves analgesia without increasing adverse events. After stopping infusion, the analgesic/sleep-promoting effects of dexmedetomidine-esketamine seemed to last for up to 24 hours. The investigators hypothesize that dexmedetomidine-esketamine combination as a supplement to oxycodone will improve sedation and analgesia in patients undergoing radiofrequency liver ablation of the liver.
In the recently published multi-center, prospective, single-blind study (THUNDER study), using the methylation signal in cfDNA isolated from the peripheral blood to detect the six types of cancer, the sensitivity for liver cancer detection achieved 87.8%, with a specificity of 98.9%. In this study, a multicenter, case-control study is designed to establish an early cancer detection model based on cfDNA methylation biomarkers using qPCR to detect primary liver cancer and further validate the performance of the model.
The recent global IMbrave150 study evaluated the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab versus sorafenib in 501 patients with advanced or metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). The median overall survival (OS) was notably better in the atezolizumab/bevacizumab group. However, for HCC patients with intrahepatic macrovascular invasion (MVI), the prognosis remains poor, indicating a significant unmet need in this group. External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) has shown promising results in treating HCC with MVI, especially when used in combination with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). It has been reported that radiotherapy may make tumor cells more susceptible to immune-mediated therapy, potentially enhancing the effects of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Thus, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab/bevacizumab alone versus atezolizumab/bevacizumab in combination with EBRT in HCC patients with macrovascular invasion.
Patients with liver tumors who underwent US-guided-MWA of liver tumors were enrolled. These patients were allocated into three groups based on tumor size and number: A, B, and C. Prior to the ablation procedure, Group A patients received a combination of hepatic hilar block (HHB), Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), and local anesthesia (LA). Patients in Group B were administered HHB in conjunction with LA, while those in Group C received TAPB and LA. Evaluative parameters included the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores, consumption of morphine, incidence of complications, and factors influencing perioperative pain.
Background and aim: FLLs are common findings in abdominal ultrasound and differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lesions is often challenging, especially in patients with chronic liver diseases. The diagnostic role of CEUS has already been defined by international guidelines when lesions show a typical pattern for hepatocellular carcinoma whereas in case of non-typical contrast enhanced patterns radiologic imaging or liver biopsy are still needed. However, these techniques are more invasive and expensive than ultrasound. Therefore, the aim of this study is to identify D-CEUS and SWE quantitative parameters useful for characterizing FLLs. Study design: Prospective, observational, single-center study Methods: 50 consecutive adult patients with focal liver lesions detectable with B-mode ultrasound will be enrolled in the Unit of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology of the Policlinico Gemelli. Exclusion criteria will be liver failure, hearth failure, previous locoregional or systemic treatments for FLLs (e.g. ablation, chemoembolization, alcoholization, chemotherapy), known allergy to ultrasound contrast agents. After obtaining informed consent and identifying the target lesion in B-mode ultrasound, patients will undergo CEUS and SWE and, subsequently, to computed tomography/magnetic resonance/biopsy according to international guidelines and current clinical practice. The average, maximum, minimum and standard deviation value of lesion elasticity in KPa will be calculated using SWE. Three consecutive SWE acquisitions will be performed both for the lesion and for the liver parenchyma and the average value of the three measurements will be considered. The CEUS will allow the construction of signal intensity curves as a function of time in a specific area of interest drawn manually. From these curves a series of quantitative parameters related to the flow and volume of blood will be extrapolated and in particular: peak intensity, PI (in Arbitrary Units, AU); time to peak, TP ( in seconds); area under the time curve, AUC (in AU); slope of the wash-in curve, Pw (in AU per second); average transit time, MTT (in seconds). In addition, the personal, clinical and laboratory data necessary to determine the hepatological scores of disease severity such as MELD and Child-Pugh will be collected. The study has an expected duration of one year.
This will be the first trial testing the feasibility of working simultaneously with the two fluorescent dyes ICG and SGM-101 in 10 patients with colorectal metastases.
The present study is a multi-center randomized prospective non-inferiority trial. The study's primary objective is to compare the coagulation profile upon using two different TXA administration strategies: empirical TXA administration vs. viscoelastic test-based goal-directed TXA administration in high-risk non-cardiac surgery. The secondary objectives include comparing the amount of bleeding, incidents of hyper-fibrinolysis, thromboembolic complications, and postoperative seizures. Researchers assumed that goal-directed tranexamic acid (TXA) administration using viscoelastic field tests would not be inferior to the empirical TXA administration strategy in reducing postoperative bleeding and hyper-fibrinolysis. It also would be beneficial in lowering TXA-induced thromboembolic complications and seizures.
This is a prospective, multi-center, open-label study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Eye90 microspheres® in the treatment of subjects with unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). Eye90 microspheres is a medical device containing yttrium-90 (Y-90), a radioactive material, and provides local radiation brachytherapy for the treatment of liver tumors.
Rationale: Complication rates after major liver resections remain as high as 43%. Many initiatives have been taken to reduce postoperative morbidity. As such, prehabilitation programmes are increasingly used for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Improvement of aerobic fitness has been proven to reduce complication rates, especially in high-risk patients (those with a low preoperative aerobic capacity). Different conceptual hypotheses exist of the underlying mechanism of variability in postoperative complications and prehabilitation response. One of the complementary rationales focusses on homeostasis-allostasis before and after surgery, more specifically on the preoperative aerobic capacity to meet postoperative metabolic demands. However, more insight in postoperative metabolic demands (energy expenditure) during in-hospital recovery from major abdominal surgery in relation to preoperative resting metabolic demands and maximal aerobic capacity is essential to understand the increase in metabolic demands coinciding with major surgery in relation to the body's reserve capacity. This information can be used to better understand the rationale behind exercise prehabilitation, as well as to optimize the content of preoperative treatment for unfit patients, for instance by means of personalized prehabilitation programs that might improve postoperative outcomes. Objective: This study aims to explore the difference of pre- and postoperative energy expenditure in patients undergoing major elective liver resection and relate this to their preoperative aerobic capacity. Study design: The study will be a prospective observational study with thorough pre- and postoperative measurements of energy expenditure. Energy expenditure will be measured using the doubly labelled water method, as well as by indirect calorimetry. To assess aerobic capacity, cardiopulmonary exercise testing will be performed pre- and postoperatively. Additionally, accelerometers will be used to evaluate pre- and postoperative physical activity levels. Study population: Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing major liver resection (≥3 segments) will be asked to participate. The inability to perform cardiopulmonary exercise testing, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and cirrhotic liver are reasons for exclusion. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter is the difference of energy expenditure pre- and postoperatively, as measured with doubly labelled water and indirect calorimetry. Secondary endpoints: Additionally, as secondary endpoints, aerobic fitness, physical activity level, and postoperative complications will be assessed.