View clinical trials related to Left Bundle-Branch Block.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing on death, worsening heart failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective therapeutic strategy in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF) patients with LVEF of ≤35% and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, approximately one-third of CRT-recipients do not improve after therapy (non-responders), despite meeting the required criteria. Previous studies have documented that the positive respons to CRT is related to the delayed electrical activation of the left ventricle in patients with LBBB. It has also been illustrated that non-ischemic CRT-candidates with LBBB demonstrate lower regional myocardial blood flow and metabolism in the septum. Additionally, it has been suggested that LBBB can lead to impaired coronary blood flow in the left anterior descending artery (LAD). This observation is based on an echocardiography-based study, that showed that the percentage of diastolic flow duration (%DD) in LAD was shorter in patients with LBBB compared to the control-group and patients with right-ventricular pacing. It has been demonstrated that CRT has positive effects on septal myocardial perfusion in patients with HF and LBBB. The dominant hypothesis explaining this phenomenon is built on improved septal myocardial work after CRT-implantation, which leads to increased myocardial energy and therefore increased myocardial perfusion. In contrast, it has been suggested that due to re-established synchronous left ventricular electrical activation, CRT reduces the septal intramyocardial pressure in early diastole, leading to a relatively longer antegrade flow duration in LAD. Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of CRT on coronary blood flow in LAD in patients with non-ischemic HF and LBBB. The investigators hypothesize that increased LV-function after CRT not only is due to resynchronized LV ejection and filling, but also improved coronary flow. The study aims to enroll 60 patients with heart failure due to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, LBBB, with or without CRT. All patients meeting the criteria will be recruited from the outpatient clinic at the Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital. Invasive flow measurements in the LAD, including fractional flow reserve (FFR), absolute coronary flow and -reserve will be conducted with the CRT on and off, respectively.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular (BiV) pacing significantly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), impaired LV function and heart failure in spite of optimal medical treatment. CRT positive effects are based on the existence of an electromechanical dyssynchrony induced by the abnormal activation sequence associated with the presence of a left bundle branch block (LBBB), which is thought to be responsible for a negative LV remodeling leading to LVEF impairment and heart failure progression. However, one third of patients undergoing CRT are considered non responders due to different reasons. Recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing modality aiming for conduction system recruitment in patients with normal or impaired atrioventricular conduction, including patients with LBBB. LBBAP achieves LBBB correction in up to 85% of the cases and thus could be a promising pacing modality for CRT candidates.
The objective of this prospective, multicenter controlled study is to assess the feasibility of a patient-tailored implantation by creating a cloud-based pre-procedural multimodality CRT-roadmap by integration of 3D images from 3D activation sequence from ECG, and coronary venous anatomy from cardiac computed tomography. This CRT-roadmap will be used to guide LV lead placement to a coronary vein in an electrically late-activated region. Study Hypothesis: At least 75% of patients undergoing a CRT implantation guided by non-invasive electrical and venous anatomy assessment (XSPLINE technology) will show a reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume of 15% or more at 6-month evaluation.
The purpose of the BIO-CONDUCT study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the BIOTRONIK Solia S pacing lead when implanted in the left bundle branch (LBB) area. Safety will be assessed by evaluating serious adverse device effects that occur through 3 months post-implant. Efficacy will be assessed by evaluating implant success rate.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BiV) is the cornerstone treatment for heart failure patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. Recently, a new concept, conduction system pacing (CSP) with permanent pacing, including His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing, has been proposed as a potential alternative to conventional BiV-CRT. The prospective, randomized trial will compare echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical effects of CSP versus conventional BiV pacing in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%), sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. Patients will be randomized to either CSP or biventricular pacing study group and followed up for at least 6 months. The study will explore whether CSP is non-inferior to BiV pacing in echocardiographic, electrocardiographic, and clinical outcomes.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) is indicated for patients with low ejection fraction and persistent symptoms of heart failure despite medical therapy and a wide QRS-complex, preferably with a left bundle branch block. Unfortunately, up to 40 % receiving CRT do not respond with subjective improvement or improved left ventricular ejection fraction from the treatment. There are few therapeutic alternatives in patients not responding to CRT with BVP, and the potential to improve cardiac function in these patients could make a large difference in terms of life quality and prognosis. His-bundle pacing (HBP) can be a suitable alternative, but is likely not possible in all patients with failed CRT. Furthermore, upgrading to HBP does require a surgical procedure and therefore exposes the patients to risk of complications (e.g. infection of the device). Therefore, early identification of the patients who are likely to benefit from an upgrade to HBP would be beneficial. This study aims to evaluate if patients with failed CRT treatment will benefit from hemodynamic improvement if they are treated with temporary HBP, without opening the device-pocket, and exposing the existing pacemaker-device to a risk of infection. A temporary pacemaker lead and pacing sheath will be used, and placed in the heart via a blood vessel on the right side of neck, using local anaesthesia. Acute effects on the pump function of the heart will be measured during rest and during supine bicycle test (the equivalent of moderate physical activity). Factors associated with a beneficial effect will be evaluated on a group basis. If the individual patient experiences an improvement of cardiac function during the test, he/she will be offered an upgrade to HBP and a replacement of the existing device.
Cardiac electrical mapping is an important tool that allows doctors to study the electrical activity of the heart in detail. Electrical mapping systems used in clinical practice are time consuming, invasive and very costly. Ultra-high frequency electrocardiography is a novel non-invasive cardiac mapping system. Ultra-high frequency electrocardiography (UHF-ECG) can be performed in 10-15 minutes without any risk or discomfort to patients. The aim of this study is to refine this mapping system, verify it against invasive mapping and develop software to bring this novel system into routine clinical use including predicting which patients will respond to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
Right ventricular pacing causes ventricular dyssynchrony and may be associated with impaired outcome. In the last decade, several approaches for more physiological pacing became available and were implemented in the latest guidelines. However, compared to conventional device implantation, cardiac resynchronization, His bundle pacing and left bundle area pacing remain demanding procedures in the individual case. Goal of the single center observational "Pace conduct" study is to evaluate implantation success, safety and outcome of pacing methods that maintain physiologic ventricular activation.
The study will investigate the feasibility of using direct HIS pacing or left bundle branch pacing (LBB pacing) as an alternative to biventricular pacing in patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ECG with a typical left bundle branch block pattern.