Clinical Trials Logo

Left Bundle-Branch Block clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Left Bundle-Branch Block.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT06324682 Recruiting - Atrial Fibrillation Clinical Trials

ConTempoRary Cardiac Stimulation in Clinical practicE: lEft, BivEntriculAr, Right, and conDuction System Pacing

TREEBEARD
Start date: January 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients undergoing permanent cardiac pacing and to compare procedural efficacy and safety of different implantation approaches in the clinical practice of the participating centres. The contribution of non-fluoroscopic anatomical and electrophysiological reconstruction systems to device implantation procedures will also be evaluated. Participants [patients over 18 years old with an indication to receive a definitive pacemaker/intracardiac defibrillator implant] will receive a permanent cardiac pacing implant as requested according to European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines; the investigators will evaluate procedural efficacy and safety of different implantation approaches.

NCT ID: NCT06148883 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Left Bundle-Branch Block

Management of Patients With New Left Bundle Branch Block After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

MONITORTAVI
Start date: November 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to show that Electrocardiogram Ambulatory Monitoring-guided strategy is superior to ElectroPhysiological Study on the rate of alive patients with an appropriate Pacemaker implantation/non-implantation, at 12 months after randomization, in patients with New Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

NCT ID: NCT05903313 Enrolling by invitation - Clinical trials for Myocardial Infarction

A Study to Evaluate Accuracy and Validity of the Chang Gung ECG Abnormality Detection Software

Start date: October 6, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

"Chang Gung ECG Abnormality Detection Software" is a is an artificial intelligence medical signal analysis software that detect whether patients have abnormal ECG signals of 14 diseases by static 12-lead ECG. The 14 diseases were - Long QT syndrome - Sinus bradycardia - Sinus Tachycardia - Premature atrial complexes - Premature ventricular complexes - Atrial Flutter, Right bundle branch block - Left bundle branch block - Left Ventricular hypertrophy - Anterior wall Myocardial Infarction - Septal wall Myocardial Infarction - Lateral wall Myocardial Infarction - Inferior wall Myocardial Infarction - Posterior wall Myocardial Infarction The main purpose of this study is to verify whether "Chang Gung ECG Abnormality Detection Software" can correctly identify abnormal ECG signals among patients of 14 diseases. The interpretation standard is the consensus of 3 cardiologists. The results of the software analysis will be used to evaluate the performance of the primary and secondary evaluation indicators.

NCT ID: NCT05884359 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Left Bundle-Branch Block

Left Bundle Branch Area Mapping for Conduction System Pacing

Start date: June 1, 2023
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study will utilize 3D mapping as a tool to explore electro-anatomical and electrocardiographic characteristics of the Left Bundle Branch Area. We plan on prospectively reviewing the data found from 3D mapping the left bundle branch implantation cases and using the data to improve understanding of electro-anatomical characteristics of this area for a better definition of the implantation target and depth.

NCT ID: NCT05814263 Not yet recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

HIS Alternative II - UK Site

Start date: April 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study will investigate the feasibility of using direct HIS pacing or left bundle branch pacing (LBB pacing) as an alternative to biventricular pacing in patients with symptomatic heart failure and an ECG with a typical left bundle branch block pattern.

NCT ID: NCT05769036 Recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

Conventional Biventricular Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients

RECOVER-HF
Start date: October 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Heart failure (HF) is the most common nosology encountered in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization and decreased quality of life. An initial approach to the treatment of HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was implantation of cardioresynchronization device using biventricular pacing. This has resulted in long-term clinical benefits such as improved quality of life, increased functional capacity, reduced HF hospitalizations and overall mortality. However, conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in only 70% of patients. And the remaining 30% of patients are non-responders to conventional CRT. Subsequently, His bundle pacing (HBP) has been developed to achieve the same results. According to other studies HBP has showed greater improvement in hemodynamic parameters than with conventional biventricular CRT. But, nevertheless, there are significant clinical troubles with HBP. In this regard, in 2017, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was developed, which demonstrated clinical advantages compared to biventricular CRT. This method has become an alternative to HBP due to the stimulation of LBB outside the blocking site, a stable pacing threshold and a narrow QRS duration. A series of case reports and observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LBBP in patients with CRT indications. However, it is not enough data about CRT with LBBP effectiveness in LV remodeling, reducing mortality and complications. According to our hypothesis, CRT with LBBP compared with conventional biventricular CRT will significantly improve the clinical outcomes and reverse LV remodeling in patients with chronic HF with reduced LV ejection fraction and reduce the number of non-responders to conventional CRT.

NCT ID: NCT05760924 Not yet recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders

RESCUE
Start date: May 1, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Heart failure (HF) is the most common nosology encountered in clinical practice. Its incidence and prevalence increase exponentially with increasing age and it is associated with the increased mortality, more frequent hospitalization and decreased quality of life. An initial approach to the treatment of HF patients with reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was implantation of device for cardiac resynchronization therapy using biventricular pacing. This has resulted in long-term clinical benefits such as improved quality of life, increased functional capacity, reduced HF hospitalizations and overall mortality. However, conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective in only 70% of patients. And the remaining 30% of patients are non-responders to conventional CRT. Cardiac conduction system pacing is currently a promising technique for these patients. Particularly, His bundle pacing (HBP) has been developed to achieve the same results. According to other studies HBP has shown greater improvement in hemodynamic parameters comparing with conventional biventricular CRT. But, nevertheless, there are significant clinical troubles with HBP, especially high pacing threshold. In this regard, in 2017, the left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) was developed, which demonstrated clinical advantages compared to conventional biventricular CRT. Also, since 2019, left bundle branch pacing-optimized CRT (LBBPO CRT) has been used in clinical practice. These methods have become an alternative to HBP due to the stimulation of LBB outside the blocking site, a stable pacing threshold and a narrow QRS complex duration on electrocardiogram. A series of case reports and observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of LBBP and LBBPO CRT in patients with CRT indications. However, it is not enough data about impact of CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing on myocardial remodeling, reducing mortality and complications. According to our hypothesis, CRT with LBBP and combined CRT with LBBP and LV pacing compared with conventional biventricular pacing will significantly improve the clinical outcomes and reverse myocardial remodeling in patients who are non-responders to biventricular CRT with HF, reduced LV ejection fraction and with indications to CRT devices with defibrillator function (CRT-D) or one of the CRT-D leads replacement.

NCT ID: NCT05652218 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Left Bundle-Branch Block

REsynchronization Comparison In LBBB and Normal or Mildly Reduced VENTricular Function With CRT (REINVENT-CRT)

REINVENT
Start date: February 26, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Primary Objective - To determine if implantation of a permanent CRT pacing device (with LB-CRT, or conventional BiV-CRT with a coronary sinus LV lead) can improve electromechanical function, HF symptoms, and natriuretic peptide levels among patients with symptomatic HF, LVEF > 35%, and LBBB.

NCT ID: NCT05643404 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Left Bundle-Branch Block

Effects of Isolated LBBB on Maximal Functional Capacity

Start date: December 22, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) has been commonly associated with adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, but the effect of an isolated LBBB on maximal functional capacity is not well characterized. The study's main objective is to evaluate the effect of LBBB on maximum functional capacity.

NCT ID: NCT05572957 Recruiting - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

LBBP as Initial Therapy in Patients With Non-ischemic Heart Failure and LBBB

LIT-HF
Start date: October 14, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The present study will recruit 50 symptomatic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35% and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB), who have not received complete guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Each patient was randomized to 2 groups, GDMT or left bundle branch pacing combined with GDMT (LBBP+GDMT) as initial therapy and was followed up for 2 phases: 0-6 months (phase I), 7-18 months (phase II). The primary objective is to compare the LVEF change , syncope and malignant ventricular arrhythmias between GDMT group and LBBP+GDMT group, and to observe which strategy will significantly reduce the percentage of recommendations for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) during phase I study. The second outcome measures including health economics, echocardiography parameters[left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV)], N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), quality of life score(QOL) and incidence of clinical adverse events.