View clinical trials related to Lacerations.
Filter by:To compare pain scores during laceration repair with first suture placement using standardized visual analog scale (VAS) between 2 different topical local anesthetic application techniques for using LET gel. Specifically, the investigators are studying if applying LET gel 3 times, spaced 10 minutes apart (triple LET) provides superior anesthesia to one 30 minute application (single LET). Single LET is the current standard method of application.
This study is designed to assess efficacy and comfort of LET solution vs. EMLA cream and topical infiltration of lidocaine.
Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel (LET) applied three times for 10 minutes each time vs. once for 30 minutes prior to suturing simple lacerations in children aged 7-17 years.
A prospective randomized within-subject controlled study to compare the clinical performance of conventional autografting with and without the RECELL system on acute non-burn full-thickness skin defects.
The most common injury prompting an emergency department (ED) visit in children is a cut (laceration) that requires repair using stitches or skin glue. Despite anesthetic (freezing), laceration repair is often very distressful because in young children, most occur on the face. There is currently no effective drug to relieve the distress of laceration repair in children. The goal is to find a safe and effective drug to reduce distress in children undergoing laceration repair. Dexmedetomidine is a new drug that safely provides mild sedation and can be given as a painless nasal spray. Intranasal dexmedetomidine (IND) has been shown to reduce distress in children undergoing painful procedures such as dental work and intravenous insertion. However, no large study has explored IND for laceration repair. In order for research to change the way we care for children, a large study that enrolls children across many paediatric EDs needs to be performed. The first step is to conduct a smaller study to identify the safest and most effective dose. The proposed study plans to enroll 55 children age 1-10 years who require laceration repair.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between perineal body length and perineal laceration risk in primigravid patients. Primigravid women with singleton pregnancies in the first stage of labor at the 35th week of gestation were included in the study. The peineal body length of the patients was measured by the same physician.
The purpose of the study is to compare cosmetic outcomes of simple facial lacerations in children repaired with Dermabond (skin glue) compared with Dermabond (skin glue) with underlying steristrips (skin adhesive strips).
This study evaluates healing time in usage of honey and povidone-iodine over paraffin gauze as dressings in the treatment of acute laceration wounds. In Indonesia, especially in rural area, where most of the resources is limited and modern dressings are expensive and hard-to-find. The investigators tried to find an alternative which was easier to find and could act as a substitute of modern wound dressing. The hypothesis of this study is honey and povidone-iodine could be a good substitute (or equal to) to paraffin gauze on acute laceration wounds. Honey is chosen because of its versatility and already well-known to be used as a chronic wound dressing. Povidone-iodine was chosen as another alternative because it is still one of the most used substance in rural area as a wound dressing, but there is not enough study to support the usage of this substance. Paraffin gauze was chosen as a representative of modern wound dressing because it fulfilled the standard of wound dressing on acute wound, which is non-adherent and also moist.
The investigators propose a pilot study to examine the feasibility of utilizing immersive virtual reality to reduce procedural anxiety in children undergoing non-facial laceration repair in the Pediatric Emergency Department. The investigators hypothesize that virtual reality will be well-received by patients and their caregivers, and that the anxiety provoked by laceration repair will be mitigated by the immersive virtual reality experience.
Background: TAVR is a common therapy for people with heart problems. It stands for transcatheter aortic valve replacement, TAVR can be a better option than surgery. But it isn t safe for everyone. It may block the arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle by pushing heart valve tissue outward. Researchers want to study a method that may make TAVR safer. It is known as Bioprosthetic or native Aortic Scallop Intentional Laceration to prevent Iatrogenic Coronary Artery obstruction (BASILICA). Objective: To study the feasibility and safety of BASILICA in people at high risk of coronary artery obstruction that complicates TAVR. Eligibility: People at least 21 years old whose heart doctors do not think they can have TAVR safely Design: Participants will be screened by a team of heart specialists. They will have heart and blood tests. They will answer questions. Participants will have TAVR using BASILICA. They will get general anesthesia or they will be sedated. While using x-rays and echocardiography, doctors will cross and split the aortic valve leaflet using an electrified wire. A standard TAVR valve will be implanted. After the procedure, participants will have blood tests and physical exams. They will answer questions. They will have heart tests. Participants will have a scan within 1 month and after 12 months. They will have heart tests during follow-up visits in the first year. Sponsoring Institute: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute